DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20175240

Determinant factors affecting the trends of permanent sterilization: a decadal analysis in a tertiary care institute

Meenakshi K. Bharadwaj, Seema Patrikar, Sanjay Singh

Abstract


Background: Permanent sterilization is a preferred method of contraception worldwide. In spite of popularization of temporary methods, it is used by 2/3rd of married women using any contraception. It has a low incidence of complications and failure rate and is cost-effective. Various socio-demographic factors play a role in acceptability of this method. It has an important role in controlling the total fertility rate.

Methods: A retrospective record based analysis was done in armed forces personnel undergoing permanent sterilization operation over 11 years between 2005-2015 in a tertiary care institute. Analysis of trends in method choices of surgery, and comparison of the variables determining these choices was done. Year wise total fertility rates was calculated and the trend over 11 years was analyzed.

Results: Permanent sterilization operations were performed in 2121 couples over the 11 years period. Of total operations, 1823 (85.95% with 95% confidence interval = 84.42, 87.38) were done in females and 298 (14.05% with 95% confidence interval = 12.62, 15.58) in males. Female sterilization acceptance ranged between 71.6% to 91.6% and male sterilization between 8.4%-28.4% with an increasing trend towards male sterilization acceptance over the years. Total fertility rate declined from 2.3 to 2.09 in 11 years.

Conclusions: Increase in literacy rate of both the partners can positively impact the male involvement in permanent sterilization and control of TFR. This would help to stabilize India’s population growth. Also, a decline in son preference can be beneficial for decline in fertility rate. 


Keywords


Contraception, Family planning, Family size at sterilization, Family welfare programmes, Sterilization operation

Full Text:

PDF

References


International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005-06: India: Volume I. Mumbai: IIPS. 2007.

Decherny H, Nathan L, Goodwin T, Laufer N. Diagnosis and Treatment Obstetrics and Gynecology. 10th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2003;48:804.

Smith GL, Taylor GP, Smith KF. Comparative risks and costs of male and female sterilization. Am J Public Health. 1985;75(4):370-4.

National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015-16: India Fact Sheet. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Available at http://rchiips.org/NFHS/pdf/NFHS4/India.pdf

UN 2009 United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Contraceptive Use 2009. Available at http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/WCU2009/Main.html

Pandit NB, Patel TA. A descriptive study on determinant factors of who accepted sterilization in rural Vadodara. Nat J Community Med. 2013;4(3):424-7.

Murthy SR, Rao MD. An analysis of Factors influencing the Acceptability of Vasectomy in Andhra Pradesh. Health and Population Perspectives and Issues. 2003;26(4):162-82.

Puwar B, Patel V, Patel M. Factors affecting sterilization operation among couples of a rural area in Ahmedabad: A record-based study. Indian J Med Sci. 2012;66:267-72.

Athavale AV, Athavale SA. Factors influencing the decision to undergo tubectomy in rural Area of Maharashtra. Regional health: forum WHO South East Asia Region. 2003;7:42-7.

Singh A, Pallikadavath S, Ram F, Ogollah R. Inequalities in advice provided by public health workers to women during antenatal sessions in rural India. PloS One. 2012;7(9):e44931.

Jejeebhoy SJ. Women's education, autonomy, and reproductive behaviour: Experience from developing countries. OUP Catalogue. 1995.

Moursund A, Kravdal O. Individual and community effects of women’s education and autonomy on contraceptive use in India. Population Studies. 2003;57(3):285-301.

Cates W Jr, Maggwa B. Family planning since ICPD how far have we progressed?. Contraception. 2014;90(6):S14-S21.

Oliveira ITD, Dias JG, Padmadas SS. Dominance of sterilization and alternative choices of contraception in India: an appraisal of the socioeconomic impact. PloS One. 2014;9(1):e86654.

Bartz D, Greenberg JA. Sterilization in the United States. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008;1(1):23-32.

Health and family welfare statistics of India 2015. Available at www.nrhm-mis.nic.in/PubFW_Statistics2015

Saha SP. Trend of socio-demographic characteristics of tubectomy acceptors in a rural area of West Bengal (Singur). Indian J Public Health. 1981;25:102-10.

Mehta DC, Shah MH, Khatri TD. Demographic characteristics of tubectomy acceptors in Kaira district. J Fam Welfare. 1975;22:32-40.

Mumbare SS, Gosavi S, Almale B, Patil A, Dhakane S, Kadu A. Trends in average living children at the time of terminal contraception: a time series analysis over 27 years using ARIMA (p, d, q) non-seasonal Model. Ind J Community Med. 2014;39(4):223-8.

Wilmoth J. The lifetime risk of maternal mortality: concept and measurement. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2009;87(4):256-62.

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). Missing. Mapping the adverse child sex ratio in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Health & Family Welfare; 2003. Available at https://www.popline.org/node/563003.