DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20180865

Evaluation of causes of still birth in a tertiary care teaching hospital

Shivani Kothiyal, Anjoo Agarwal, Vinita Das, Amita Pandey, Smriti Agarwal

Abstract


Background: Whenever pregnancy occurs there is an expectation that every pregnancy will end with the birth of a healthy baby, yet in a developing country like India 22 in every 1000 births are stillborn. The objective of this study was to evaluate the rate and causes of still birth in a tertiary care teaching hospital, Queen Mary, King George Medical college and university, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Methods: Present study was an observational study in a tertiary care hospital. 7024 births occurred in the institution over a period of 1 year out of which 550 were stillbirths. Stillbirths which weighed over 500 grams were included in the study. After informed consent, details of history about epidemiological factors, obstetric history and medical history were obtained. Antenatal investigations including imaging, delivery details and stillborn morphological characteristics were analyzed to identify the cause of stillbirth

Results: Out of 7024 deliveries, stillbirth rate was 78.30/1000 total births. Cause of intrapartum stillbirth showed statistically significant correlation with patient’s place of residence (rural>urban), distance of health centre from her house, time taken to reach first point of contact and her parity. The major obstetrical causes of stillbirth identified were APH 22.36%, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy 19.27%, IUGR 15.27%, unexplained causes 11.09%, mal-presentations 9.64%, rupture uterus 9.09% and obstructed labour 6.36%. Severe anemia was found in 24.91% as an associated obstetrical cause of stillbirth.

Conclusions: The rate of stillbirth is higher as compared to the Indian data (22/1000 total births). Antepartum obstetric complications (APH, hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, IUGR) were the most common. 15.45% cases showed intrapartum causes of stillbirth (obstructed labour and rupture uterus) which was significantly higher than developed countries where such cases are negligible. The higher number of intrapartum deaths indicate that better healthcare services can drastically reduce stillbirth rates in developing countries.


Keywords


Rate of stillbirth, Stillbirth, Stillbirth causes

Full Text:

PDF

References


WHO. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems: tenth revision, volume 2: instruction manual. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1993.

Bhutta Z, Nundy S, Abbasi K. Is there hope for South Asia? BMJ. 2004;328:777-8.

Bang AT, Bang RA, Baitule SB, Reddy MH, Deshmukh MD. Effect of home-based neonatal care and management of sepsis on neonatal mortality: field trial in rural India. Lancet. 1999;354:1955-61.

Cousens S, Blencowe H, Stanton C, Chou D, Ahmed S, Steinhardt L, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2009 with trends since 1995: a systematic analysis. The Lancet. 2011;377(9774):1319-30.

Wang H, Yuan X, Yan S. Monitoring and intervention of infant mortality rate and fetal and infant mortality rate in Beijing, 1992-2000. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2001;81:1424-6.

Lawn J, Shibuya K, Stein C. No cry at birth: global estimates of intrapartum stillbirths and intrapartum-related neonatal deaths. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83:409-17.

Maternal and Child Health Research Consortium. Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy (CESDI). 7th annual report. London: Maternal and Child Health Research Consortium; 1999.

Pattinson R, Kerber K, Buchmann E, Friberg IK, Belizan M, Lansky S, et al. Stillbirths: how can health systems deliver for mothers and babies?. The Lancet. 2011;377(9777):1610-23.

Willinger M, Chia-Wen K, Reddy UM. Racial disparities in stillbirth across gestation in united states. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009:469:1-8.

Akpala CO. Perinatal mortality in a northern Nigerian rural community. J R Soc Health. 1993;113:124-7.

Aisien AO, Lawson JO, Okolo A. Two years prospective study of perinatal mortality in Jos, Nigeria. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;71:171-3.

Wu Z, Viisainen K, Wang Y, Hemminki E. Perinatal mortality in rural China: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2003;327:1319.

Hossain N, Khan NH, Khan N. Obstetric causes of stillbirth at low socioeconomic settings. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80(3):235-44.

Fretts RC. Etiology and prevention of stillbirth. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;193:1923-35.

Luo ZC, Wilkins R, Kramer MS. Effect of neighborhood income and maternal education on birth outcomes: a population-based study. CMAJ. 2006;174:1415-20.

Winbo I, Serenius F, Dahlquist G, Källén B. Maternal risk factors for cause-specific stillbirth and neonatal death.al, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80(3):235-44.

Gordon A, Raynes-Greenow C, McGeechan K, Morris J, Jeffery H. Risk factors for antepartum stillbirth and the influence of maternal age in new South Wales Australia: a population-based study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2013;13(1):12.

Flenady V, Middleton P, Smith GC, Duke W, Erwich JJ, Yee Kong T, et al. Stillbirth: a way forward in high income countries. Lancet 2011;377:1703-17.

Saade, Bukowski, Carpenter, Conway, Dudley, Goldenberg, et al. Association between stillbirth and risk factors known at pregnancy confirmation. JAMA. 2011;306:2469-79.

Copper RL, Goldenberg RL, DuBard MB. Risk factors for cause-specific stillbirth and neonatal death. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001;80:235-44

Gardosi J, Madurasinghe V, Williams M, Malik A, Francis A. Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population-based study. BMJ. 2013;346:f108.

Gardosi J, Kady SM, Mc Geown P, Francis A, Tonks A. Classification of stillbirth by relevant condition at death (ReCoDe); population-based cohort study. BMJ. 2005;331;1113-7.

Froen JF, Gardosi JO, Thurmann A, Francis A, Stray-Pedersen B. Restricted fetal growth in sudden intrauterine unexplained deaths. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83(9):801-7.

Froen JF, Arnestad M, Frey K. Risk factors for sudden unexplained death: epidemiological charecteristics in singleton cases in Oslo Norway, 1986-1995. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:694-702.

Ogunyemi D, Jackson U, Buyske S. Clinical and pathologic correlates of stillbirths in a single institution. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998;77:722-8.

Huang DY, Usher RH, Kramer MS. Determinants of unexplained antepartum fetal deaths. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:215-21.

Little RE, Weinberg CR. Risk factors for antepartum and intrapartum stillbirth. Am J Epidemiol 1993;137:1177-89.

Conde-Agudelo A, Belizan JM, Diaz-Rossello JL. Epidemiology of fetal death in Latin America. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79:371-8.

Myers SA, Ferguson D, Ferguson R. A population study of the relationship between fetal death and altered fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;74:325-31.

Gardosi J, Mul T, Mongelli M. Analysis of birthweight and gestational age in antepartum stillbirths. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105:524-30.

Smith GCS. Sex, birth weight, and the risk of stillbirth in Scotland, 1980-1996. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:614-9.

Gruenberger W, Gerstner GJ. The causes of antepartum fetal death: a clinico-pathological study. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 1980;7(4):210-4.

Copper RL, Goldenberg RL, DuBard MB, Davis RO. Risk factors for fetal death in white, black, and Hispanic women. Collaborative Group on Preterm Birth Prevention. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84(4):490-5.

Maleckiene L, Nadisauskiene R, Stankeviciene I. A case-referent study on fetal bacteremia and late fetal death of unknown etiology in Lithuania. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79:1069-74.

Raymond EG, Cnattingius S, Kiely JL. Effects of maternal age, parity, and smoking on the risk of stillbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101:301-6.

Cnattingius S, Bergstrom R, Lipworth L. Prepregnancy weight and risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:147-52.

Ahlenius I, Thomassen P. The changing panorama of late fetal death in Sweden between 1984 and 1991. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999;78:408-14.

Kiely JL, Paneth N, Susser M. Fetal death during labor: an epidemiologic indicator of level of obstetric care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;153:721-7.