DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20175284

Determination of frequency of specified structural congenital anomalies and the pattern of determinants affecting congenital malformations in prenatally diagnosed fetal anomaly cases before 20 weeks

Nishi Sood, Manish Thakur

Abstract


Background: Congenital anomalies accounts for 8-15% of perinatal deaths and 13-16% of neonatal deaths in India. The aim of this study was to determine frequency of specified structural congenital anomalies and the pattern of determinants affecting congenital malformations in prenatally diagnosed fetal anomaly cases before 20 weeks

Methods: The present study was conducted at Kamla Nehru State Hospital for Mother and Child, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla. During the study period, all pregnant women with prenatally diagnosed fetal anomaly before 20 weeks, reporting to the Department of OBG, were enrolled for this non-interventional prospective observational study. The observations were analysed on a statistical basis in structured data collection form.

Results: Congenital malformations were significantly more common in the age groups of 20-30 years, of low socioeconomic status, vegetarians and who were non-compliant regarding folic acid intake. The majority of women bearing malformed foetuses came from areas at altitude of 500-2000 meters. 33.33% of foetuses had amniotic fluid abnormalities. 83.33% of the foetuses had a single malformation. Central nervous system was the most common system involved (61.90%) out of which neural tube defects (76.91%) were commonest. 11.9% malformations were of the gastrointestinal tract out of which majority (60%) were omphalocele. 4.76% of the total malformations were of the musculoskeletal system. 4.76% malformations involved the genito-urinary tract and 2.38% of the total malformations were of the cardiovascular system and craniofascial anomalies.

Conclusions: Early detection of major malformation during pregnancy helps in reducing the high morbidity and mortality of neonates due to congenital malformations because of termination of pregnancy. The commonest system found to be affected was central nervous system followed by gastro-intestinal system. Food fortification with folates and vitamin B12 is the need of the hour.


Keywords


Medical termination of pregnancy, Structural malformations, Twenty weeks

Full Text:

PDF

References


Suresh S, Thangavel GU, Sujatha JA, Indrani S. Methodological issues in setting up a surveillance system for birth defects in India. Nat Med J India. 2005;18(5).

Park K. Park’s Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine, 21st ed. Jabalpur: Bhanot Publishers; 2011:531.

Bhat BV, Ravikumara M. Perinatal mortality in India-Need for introspection. Indian J Ma-tern Child Health. 1996;7:31-3.

Agarwal SS, Singh PS, Singh SS, Das V, Sharma A. Prevalence and spectrum of congenital malformations in a prospective study at a teaching hospital. Indian J Med Res. 1991;94: 413-9.

Kumar V, Singh AJ, Marwaha RK. An epidemiological study of congenital malformations in rural children. Swasth Hind. 1986;30(7):165.

WHO. Global health situations and projections-estimates, Geneva: WHO Division of Epidemiological Surveillance and Health Situation and Trend Assessment; 1992.

WHO. Birth defects report. Geneva: WHO Sixty Third World Health Assembly Journal. 2015. Avaialable at http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA63-REC1/WHA63_REC1-en.pdf

Termination of pregnancy report. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2010. Available at https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/terminationpregnancyreport18may2010.pdf

The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, India. Available at www.mohfw.nic.in/ index1.php

Mishra D, Singh HP. Kuppuswamy’s socioeconomic status scale- A revision. Indian J Pediatr. 2003;70(3):273-4.

Taksande A, Vilhekar K, Chaturvedi P, Jani M. Congenital malformations at birth in Central India: a rural medical college hospital based data. Indian J Human Genetics. 2010;16(3):159-63.

Sarkar S, Patra C, Dasgupta MK. Prevalence of congenital anomalies in neonates and associated risk factors in a tertiary care hospital in Eastern India. J Clin Neonatol. 2013;2(3):131-4

Shawky RM, Sadik DI. Congenital malformations prevalent among Egyptian children and associated risk factors. Egyptian J Med Human Genetics. 2011;12(1):69-78

Kamble V, Patil S, Bhatia T, Thaware P, Mathur P. The epidemiological study of congenital anomalies and their possible risk factors in Navi Mumbai. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4(5):1396-9.

Christianoon RE, Van Den Berg BJ, Milkovich WF, Oechsli L. Incidence of congenital anomalies among white, black live births with long-term follow-up. J Public Health. 1981;71:1333-41.

Yajnik CS, Deshpande SS, Lubree HG, Naik SS, Bhat DS, Uradey BS. Vitamin B12 deficiency and hyperhomocysteinemia in rural and urban Indians. J Assoc Pediatr India. 2006;54:775-82.

Desai NA. Congenital anomalies: a prospective study at a teaching hospital. Indian J Pediatr. 1991;94:413-9.

Perveen F, Tyaab S. Frequency and pattern of distribution of congenital anomalies in the newborn and associated maternal risk factors. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2007;17(6):340-3.

Bhalerao A, Garg R. Pattern of Congenital anomalies at birth. Int J Obstet Gynaecol Res (IJOGR). 2016;3(7):420-6.

Singh A, Sinha S. Risk factors of congenital malformations in North India: a case-control study. J Postgraduate Med Education Res.2016;50(2):59-63.

Daly LE, Kirke PN, Molloy A, Weir DG, Scott JM. Folate levels and neural tube defects implications for prevention. JAMA. 1995;274(21):1698-701.

Gabbe, Steven G. Obstetrics, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier/Saunders; 2012:986-7.

Holmes LB, Harvey EA, Coull BA. The teratogenicity of anticonvulsant drugs. New England J Med. 2001;344:1132-8.

Stoll C, Alembik Y, Roth MP, Dott B. Study of 224 cases of oligohydramnios and congenital malformations in a series of 225,669 consecutive births. Public Health Genomics. 1998;1:71-7.

Stoll C, Alembik Y, Dott B. Study of 156 Cases of polyhydramnios and congenital malformations in a series of 118,265 consecutive births. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165(3):586-90.

Martínez-Frías ML, Bermejo E, Rodríguez-Pinilla E, Frias JL. Maternal and fetal factors related to abnormal amniotic fluid. J Perinatol. 1999;19(7).

Chen CP. Congenital malformations associated with maternal diabetes. Taiwanese J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;44(1):1-7.

Grewal J, Carmichael SL, Ma C, Lammer EJ, Shaw GM. Maternal periconceptional smoking and alcohol consumption and risk for select congenital anomalies. Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology. 2008;82(7):519-26.

Francine R, Pascale S, Aline H. Congenital anomalies: prevalence and risk factors. Univ J Public Health. 2014;2(2):58-63.

Ronya R, Gupta D, Ghosh SK, Narang R, Jain KB. Spectrum of congenital surgical malformations in newborns. J India Med Assoc. 2002;100(9):565-6.

Grover N. Congenital malformations in Shimla. Indian J Pediatr. 2000;67(4):249-51.

Malla BK. One year review study of congenital anatomical malformation at birth in maternity hospital (Prasutigriha), Thapathali, Kathmandu. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2007;5(4):557-60.

Castilla E, Lopez-Camelo J, Campana H. Altitude as a risk factor for congenital anomalies. Am J Med Genet. 1999;86(1):9-14.