DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20175823

Povidone-iodine versus normal saline solution in preoperative vaginal cleansing before office hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled trial

Ahmed M. Abbas, Asmaa S. Shaltout, Shymaa S. Ali, Armia Michael, Ahmed Altraigey, Laila E. Abdelfatah

Abstract


Background: Hysteroscopy is well-thought-out the gold standard for assessing the uterine cavity, and now can be done as an office process due to enhanced endoscopic advances with no need to in-patient admission. Objective of the present study was to compare the difference in the rate of postoperative vaginal irritation symptoms and postoperative infections after using povidone iodine (PI) and normal saline (NS) solution in vaginal cleaning before outpatient office hysteroscopy (OH).

Methods: Women attended to the hospital for diagnostic OH were included for present study. Eligible women were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to two groups. Group I "PI group" women exposed to PI for vaginal cleansing before hysteroscopy, and group II "NS group” women exposed to the NS solution for vaginal cleansing. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the difference in the rate of postoperative vaginal irritation symptoms and postoperative infections in both groups.

Results: The mean age of the study participants was 34.26±4.14 years for NS group compared to 35.22±4.01 years for PI group (p=0.652). The PI group reported higher rate of vaginal irritation than NS group with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.179). Both groups were similar in postoperative fever, urinary tract infection and vaginitis (p>0.05).

Conclusions: This study concluded that preoperative vaginal disinfection at the time of OH with a NS solution is less frequently causing postoperative vaginal irritation symptoms. Additionally, it is as effective as the usual agent (PI) in preventing postoperative infections.


Keywords


Disinfection, Hysteroscopy, Povidone iodine, Saline

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brown SE, Coddington CC, Schnorr J, Toner JP, Gibbons W, Oehninger S. Evaluation of outpatient hysteroscopy, saline infusion hysterosonography and hysterosalpingography in infertile women: a prospective, randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2000;74:1029-34.

Shushan A, Rojansky N. Should hysteroscopy be a part of the basic infertility workup? Hum Reprod. 1999;14 (8):1923-4.

Gordts S, Campo R, Puttemans P. Investigation of the infertile couple. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(7):1684-7.

Prevedourakis C, Loutradis D, Kalianidis C, Makris N, Aravantinos D. Hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy in female infertility. Hum Reprod. 1994;9(12):2353-5.

Wang CW, Lee CL, Lai YM, Tsai CC, Chang MY, Soong YK. Comparison of hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy in female infertility. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1996;3(4):581-4.

Abdel Badee AY, Ali MK, Abbas AM, Shazly SA. Evaluation of povidone Iodine 10% versus 7.5% hand scrub in cesarean section wound infections: A prospective trial. IJOG. 2014;2(3):45-51.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Solutions for surgical preparation of the vagina. Committee Opinion No. 571. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:718-20.

Najafian A, Fallahi S, Khorgoei T, Ghahiri A, Alavi A, Rajaei M et al. Role of soap and water in the treatment of wound dehiscence compared to normal saline plus povidone-iodine: A randomized clinical trial. J Educ Health Promot. 2015;4:86.

Salami, AA, Imosemi IO, Owoeye OO. A comparison of the effect of chlorhexidine, tap water and normal saline on healing wounds. Int J Morphol. 2006;24(4):673-6.

Amstey MS, Jones AP. Preparation of the vagina for surgery. A comparison of povidone-iodine and saline solution. JAMA. 1981;245:839-41.

Kjølhede, Halili S, Löfgren M. Vaginal cleansing and postoperative infectious morbidity in vaginal hysterectomy. A register study from the Swedish National Register for Gynecological Surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90(1):63-71.

Ali MK, Abbas AM, Abdalmageed OS, Abdelmagied AM, Abdel-Ghany MF, Khodry MM. Comparison between povidone-iodine versus normal saline solution in preoperative vaginal cleansing before short duration gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized clinical trial. World J Laparoscop Surg. 2017 (Article in press).

Culligan PJ, Kubik K, Murphy M, Blackwell L, Snyder J. A randomized trial that compared povidone iodine and chlorhexidine as antiseptics for vaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:4225.

Haas DM, Morgan S, Contreras K. Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution before cesarean section forpreventing postoperative infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;12:CD007892.

Nagasawa M, Hayashi H, Nakayoshi T. In vitro evaluation of skinsensitivity of povidone-iodine and other antiseptics using a three dimensional human skin model. Dermatology. 2002;204(Suppl 1):109-13.

Niedner R. Cytotoxicity and sensitization of povidone-iodine and other frequently used anti-infective agents. Dermatology. 1997;195(suppl 2):89-92.

Vorherr H, Vorherr UF, Mehta P, Ulrich JA, Messer RH. Vaginal absorption of povidone-iodine. JAMA. 1980;244:2628-9.

Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:250-78,279-80.

VanOs HC, Roozenburg BJ, Janssen-CaspersHA, Leerentveld RA, Scholtes MC, Zeilmaker GH, et al. Vaginal disinfection with povidone-iodine and the outcome of invitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:349-50.

Lewis LA, Lathi RB, Crochet P, Nezhat C. Preoperative vaginal preparation with baby shampoo compared with povidone-iodine before gynecologic procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:736-9.