DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20175860

A prospective comparative study of oral and vaginal misoprostol after pre-treatment with single dose of mifepristone for second trimester abortion

Aastha Bhaskar, Richa Kaushik, Ashwani Kumar

Abstract


Background: Misoprostol is a synthetic PGE1 analogue which induces cervical ripening as well as strong uterine contractions and leads to expulsion of pregnancy. Misoprostol has been shown to have several advantages over other prostaglandins; it is cheap, stable at room temperature and can be given by various routes. Administration of mifepristone 24 to 48 hours before misoprostol decreases mean induction time which varies with route of administration of misoprostol.

Methods: 50 women with single intrauterine pregnancy with gestational age 13-20 weeks, admitted in labour room of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak for termination of pregnancy (on account of missed abortion, absent liquor or gross congenital malformation)  were given 200 mg of mifepristone orally after taking written informed consent and excluding scarred uterus, placenta praevia, bronchial asthma, any cardiovascular disease, clotting disorder, long term use of glucocorticoids and history of glaucoma. Then they were randomized into two groups of 25 women each. Group I included 25 women who received oral misoprostol and group II included 25 women who received vaginal misoprostol. Complete abortion was defined as successful expulsion of both foetus and placenta without any intervention. Failure was defined as cases with incomplete expulsion or incomplete dilatation or no dilatation.

Results: The mean number of doses of misoprostol used in groups I and group II were 2.80±1.19 and 2.20±0.86 respectively and the difference was statistically significant (p value 0.04). Out of 25 patients included in each group, 64% (n=16) in group I and 80% (n=20) in group II patients had complete expulsion with misoprostol and remaining 36% (n=9) in group I and 20% (n=5) in group II either needed syntocinon or post expulsion evacuation for retained product of conceptions and who did not respond to the given doses of misoprostol at all required mechanical dilatation and evacuation. But this difference was not statistically significant. The mean induction abortion interval in cases of complete expulsion observed in group I was 10.74±4.12 hours and 8.67±3.23 hours in group II which was statistically significant (p value 0.05).

Conclusions: Vaginal route is better than oral route for second trimester termination of pregnancy as it requires less number of Misoprostol doses and shorter induction abortion interval.


Keywords


Abortion, Mifepristone, Misoprostol, Oral, Vaginal

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Sponge CY, Dash JS, Casey BM et al. Abortion. In: Textbook of Williams Obstetrics, 24th ed. New York, McGraw Hill Co.;2005:350-76.

World Health Organization. Unsafe abortion global and regional estimates of the incidence of unsafe abortion and association mortality in 2000. 4thed. 2004:82.

Drey EA, Foster DG, Jackson RA, Lee SJ, Cardenas LH, Darney PD. Risk factors associated with presenting for abortion in the second trimester. Obstetrics Gynecol 2006;107:128-35.

Grimes DA. The continuing need for late abortions. JAMA. 1998;280:747-50.

Bujalkova M. Birth control in antiquity. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2007;108:163-6.

Urquhart DR, Empleton AA. Mifepristone (RU 486) and second-trimester termination. Lancet 1987;2:1405.

Silvestre L, Dubois C, Renault M. Voluntary interruption of pregnancy with mifepristone (RU 486) and a prostaglandin analogue. A large-scale French experience. N Eng J Med. 1990;322:645-8.

Gottlieb C, Bygdeman M. The use of antiprogestin (RU 486) for termination of second trimester pregnancy. Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 1991;70:199-203.

Bygdeman M, Swahn ML. Progesterone receptor blockage. Effect on uterine contractility and early pregnancy. Contraception. 1985;32:45-51.

Swahn ML, Bygdeman M. The effect of the antiprogestin RU 486 on uterine contractility and sensitivity to prostaglandin and oxytocin. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;95:126-34.

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Induced Abortion Guidelines No. 11. London7 RCOG, 1997.

Bartlett LA, Berg CJ, Shulman HB. Risk factors for legal induced abortion-related mortality in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:729-37.

Elam-Evans LD, Strauss LT, Herndon J. Abortion surveillance - United States, 2000. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Surveillance Summaries 2003;52:1-32.

Boyd PA, Tondi F, Hicks NR. Autopsy after termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2004;328:137.

Safe Abortion: Technical and Policy Guidelines for Health Systems. Geneva 7 World Health Organization, 2003.

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion. Guidelines No.7. London, 2004.

Grimes DA, Schulz KF, Cates W Jr. Mid-trimester abortion by dilatation and evacuation: a safe and practical alternative. N Eng J Med. 1977;296:1141-5.

Autry AM, Hayes EC, Jacobson GF. A comparison of medical induction and dilation and evacuation for second trimester abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:393-7.

Report of Confidential Enquires into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom (1994-1996) Why Mothers Die. Department of Health. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office. 1997.

Lalitkumar S, Bygdeman M, Gemzell DK. Mid-trimester induced abortion: a review. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13:37-52.

World Health Organization. Unsafe Abortion: Global Estimates of the Incidence of Unsafe Abortion and Associated Mortality in 2000. 4th ed. Geneva7 WHO, 2004.

Johannisson E, Oberholzer M, Swahn ML. Vascular changes in the human endometrium following the administration of the progesterone antagonist RU 486. Contraception. 1989;39:103-7.

Norman JE, Thong KJ, Baird DT. Uterine contractility and induction of abortion in early pregnancy by misoprostol and mifepristone. Lancet. 1991;338:1233-6.

Radestad A, Christensen NJ, Stromberg L. Induced cervical ripening with Mifepristone in first trimester abortion. A double blind randomized biomechanical study. Contraception. 1988;38:301-12.

Mitchell MD. Regulation of eicasanoid biosynthesis during pregnancy and parturition. In: Hiller K, editor. Eicsanoids and Reproduction. Lancaster 7 MTP Press, 1987:108-27.

Ngoc NT, Shochet T, Raghavan S. Mifepristone and misoprostol compared with misoprostol alone for second-trimester abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:601-8.

Ulmann A, Teutsch G, Philibert D. RU486. Sci Am 1990;262:42-8.

Bartley J, Brown A, Elton R, Baird DT. Double-blind randomized trial of mifepristone in combination with vaginal gemeprost or misoprostol for induction of abortion up to 63 days gestation. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2098-2102.

Knudsen UB. First trimester abortion with mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol. Contraception 2001;63:247-50.

Heikinheimo O, Lahteenmaki PL, Koivunen E, Shoupe D, Croxatto H, Luukkainen T, et al. Metaboloism and serum binding of RU486 in women after various single doses. Hum Reprod. 1987;2:379-85.

Creinin MD. Medical management of abortion. ACOG Practice Bulletin. 2001;26:1-3.

Carbonell JLL, Varela L, Velazco A, Fernandez C. The use of misoprostol for termination of early pregnancy. Contraception. 1997;55:165-8.

Roudsari FV, Ayati S, Saghafy N, Shaker M. Misoprostol alone or in combination with methotrexate for termination of pregnancy at first trimester. 2010;9:89-94.

Hoekstra M, Haagsma C, Neef C. Bioavailability of higher dose methotrexate comparing oral and subcutaneous administration in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2000;31:645-8.