Placental biometry for prediction of small for gestational age fetuses in low resource setting

Authors

  • Megha Jindal Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University College of Medical Sciences and Associated Hospital, Delhi, India
  • Sangeeta Gupta Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Hospitals, Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20175069

Keywords:

Placental biometry, Small for gestational age fetuses

Abstract

Background: Small for gestational age refers to foetuses with birth weight less than tenth centile for gestational age. Such foetuses are at increased risk of intrauterine fatal demise in comparison to others. Placenta plays a central role in supporting foetal growth. Researchers have emphasized on three dimensional sonographic placental volumetry as a predictor of SGA. This study focussed on role of two dimensional Ultrasonographic placental measurement in predicting SGA foetuses.

Methods: Prospective study was conducted at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maulana Azad Medical College from November 2013 to February 2015. In singleton pregnancies at 18-22 weeks of gestation, placental biometry (in two dimensions) was performed. Maximal Placental Diameter (MaxPD) and Maximal Placental Thickness (MaxPT) in two orthogonal planes was recorded. Mean Placental Diameter (MPD) and Mean Placental Thickness (MPT) were calculated. At the time of delivery, as per the birth weight the neonate was classified into appropriate for gestational age (AGA)/ SGA/ large for gestational age (LGA). MPD and MPT were analyzed as predictors of SGA.

Results: Both the MaxPDs and MPD were significantly smaller in SGA pregnancies (all with p ≤ 0.001). Similarly, both the MaxPTs (p = 0.006 and p = 0.001) and MPT (p = 0.000) were significantly smaller in SGA pregnancies. The ROC curve for combined placental biometry had the maximum area under the curve (0.805).

Conclusions: Placental measurements taken in mid-gestation are a valuable predictor of SGA. Measurement of placental diameter and thickness is quick and simple. This approach should be explored in future to develop a predictive model for growth restricted foetuses.

References

WHO. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1995;854:1-452.

Lee AC, Katz J, Blencowe H, Cousens S, Kozuki N, Vogel JP, et al. National and regional estimates of term and preterm babies born small for gestational age in 138 low-income and middle-income countries in 2010. Lancet Glob Health. 20131(1):e26-36.

Pilliod RA, Cheng YW, Snowden JM, Doss AE, Caughey AB. The risk of intrauterine fetal death in the small-for-gestational-age fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(4):318.e1-6.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Practice bulletin no. 134: fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(5):1122-33.

Schwartz N, Coletta J, Pessel C, Feng R, Timor-Tritsch IE, Parry S, et al. Novel 3-dimensional placental measurements in early pregnancy as predictors of adverse pregnancy outcomes. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29(8):1203-12.

Campbell S. Is placental size a good predictor of obstetric complications?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;34(3):247-8.

Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements--a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151(3):333-7.

Schwartz N, Wang E, Parry S. Two-dimensional sonographic placental measurements in the prediction of small-for-gestational-age infants. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;40(6):674-9.

Singh M. Pediatric clinical methods. Examination of a newborn baby. 3rd ed. New Delhi: Sagar Publications; 2009;14:242.

Albu AR, Anca AF, Horhoianu VV, Horhoianu IA. Predictive factors for intrauterine growth restriction. J Med Life. 2014;7(2):165-71.

Roberge S, Nicolaides KH, Demers S, Villa P, Bujold E. Prevention of perinatal death and adverse perinatal outcome using low-dose aspirin: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(5):491-9.

Whittle W, Chaddha V, Wyatt P, Huppertz B, Kingdom J. Ultrasound detection of placental insufficiency in women with unexplained abnormal maternal serum screening results. Clin Genet. 2006;69:97-104.

Graafmans WC, Richardus JH, Borsboom GJ, Bakketeig L, Langhoff-Roos J, BergsjøP, et al. Birth weight and perinatal mortality: a comparison of optimal birth weight in seven Western European countries. Epidemiol. 2002;13(5):569-74.

Misra DP, Salafia CM, Miller RK, Charles AK. Non-linear and gender-specific relationships among placental growth measures and the fetoplacental weight ratio. Placenta. 2009;30(12):1052-7.

Proctor LK, Toal M, Keating S, Chitayat D, Okun N, Windrim RC, et al. Placental size and the prediction of severe early-onset intrauterine growth restriction in women with low pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34(3):274-82.

Toal M, Chaddha V, Windrim R, Kingdom J. Ultrasound detection of placental insufficiency in women with elevated second trimester serum alpha-fetoprotein or human chorionic gonadotropin. J Obstet Gynecol Can. 2008;30(3):198-206.

Costa SL, Proctor L, Dodd JM, Toal M, Okun N, Johnson JA, et al. Screening for placental insufficiency in high-risk pregnancies: is earlier better?. Placenta. 2008;29(12):1034-40.

Toal M, Chan C, Fallah S, Alkazaleh F, Chaddha V, Windrim RC, et al. Usefulness of a placental profile in high-risk pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(4):363.e1-7.

Viero S, Chaddha V, Alkazaleh F, Simchen MJ, Malik A, Kelly E, et al. Prognostic value of placental ultrasound in pregnancies complicated by absent end-diastolic flow velocity in the umbilical arteries. Placenta. 2004;25(8-9):735-41.

Downloads

Published

2017-11-23

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles