DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20175091

Comparison of single versus double intra uterine insemination

B. Pathak

Abstract


Background: Intrauterine insemination (IUI) is the best studied and most widely practised artificial insemination technique. The aim and objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of single and double intrauterine insemination.

Methods: This prospective randomized study was carried out in 197 infertile couples. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation was carried out by standard ovulation induction protocols. Single intrauterine insemination was applied 36 hours after human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) injection to 101 patients in the first group. Double intrauterine inseminations were carried out in 96 patients to whom the first insemination was done after 24 hours and the repeat insemination was done after 48 hours of hCG injection.

Results: In the single IUI group 14 patients conceived with pregnancy rate of 13.86%. In the double IUI group 18 patients conceived with pregnancy rate of 18.75%. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups as the p is more than 0.05.

Conclusions: As double intrauterine insemination does not give better result and it involves more cost and stress to the couple, single intrauterine insemination should be preferable. However, further larger sample size studies are required for confirmation if any significant difference can be achieved between the two approaches.


Keywords


Double, Insemination, Intrauterine, Pregnancy rate, Single

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ragni G, Maggioni P, Guermandi E, Testa A, Baroni E, Colombo M, et al. Efficacy of double intrauterine insemination in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles. Fertility and Sterility. 1999;72(4):619-22.

Silverberg KM, Johnson JV, Olive DL, Burns WN, Schenken RS. A prospective, randomized trial comparing two different intrauterine insemination regimens in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles. Fertility and Sterility. 1992;579(2):357-61.

Cohlen BJ, Vandekerckhove P, te Velde ER, Habbema JD. Timed intercourse versus intra-uterine insemination with or without ovarian hyperstimulation for subfertility in men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000360.

Goverde AJ, McDonnell J, Vermeiden JP, Schats R, Rutten FF, Schoemaker J. Intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: a randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet. 2000;355:13-8.

Philips Z, Barraza-Llorens M, Posnett J. Evaluation of the relative cost-effectiveness of treatments for infertility in the UK. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:95-106.

Society for Assisted Reproductive technology and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1998 American Society for reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive technology registry. Fertility and Sterility. 2002;77:18-31.

Mathieu C, Ecochard R, Bied V, Lornage J, Czyba JC. Cumulative conception rate following intrauterine artificial insemination with husband’s spermatozoa; influence of husband’s age. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1090-7.

van Noord-Zaadstra BM, Looman CW, Alsbach H, Habbema JD, te Velde ER, Karbaat J. Delaying childbearing: Effect of age on fecundity and outcome of pregnancy. Br Med J. 1991;302:1361-5.

Devroey P, Godoy H, Smitz J, Camus M, Tournaye H, Derde MP, et al. Female age predicts embryonic implantation after ICSI: a case controlled study. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1324-7.

Hughes EG. The effectiveness of ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of persistent infertility: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 1997:12:1865-72.

Navot D, Goldstein N, MorJoset S, Simon A, Relou A, Birkenfeld A. Multiple pregnancies: risk factors and prognostic variables during induction of ovulation with human menopausal gonadotropins. Hum Reprod. 1995;6:1152-5.

Cano F, Simon C, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Effect of aging on the female reproductive system: evidence for a role of uterine senescence in the decline in female fecundity. Fertility and Sterility. 1995;64:584.

Tomlimson MJ, Arthur AJB, Thompson KA, Kasraie JL, Bentick B. Prognostic indicators for intrauterine insemination (IUI): Statistical model for IUI success. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(9):1892-6.

Randall GW, Gantt PA. Double versus single intrauterine insemination per cycle: use in gonadotropin cycles and in diagnostic categories of ovulatory dysfunction and male factor infertility. J Reprod Med. 2008;53(3):196-202.

Osuna C, Matorras R, Pijoan JI, Rodriguez-Escudero FJ. One versus two inseminations per cycle in intrauterine insemination with sperm from patient’s husband: a systematic review of the literature. Fertility and Sterility. 2004:82(1):17-24.

Jameel T. Sperm swim-up: a simple and effective technique of semen processing for IUI. J Pak Med Assoc. 2008;58(2):71.