Obstetric and neonatal outcome among women presenting with reduced fetal movements in third trimester


  • Vidyashree G. Poojari Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka, India
  • Sahan S. Kumar Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka, India
  • Akhila Vasudeva Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka, India




Biophysical profile, Reduced fetal movements, Stillbirth, Steroid prophylaxis


Background: Reduced maternal perception of fetal movements allows early identification, timely evaluation and intervention for fetuses at risk of adverse outcome. The primary objective of this study was to assess the pregnancy characteristics and outcomes of pregnant women presenting to hospital with reduced fetal movements (RFM).

Methods: Prospective observational study, recruiting all women with singleton pregnancy at or beyond 28 weeks of gestation presenting with a subjective perception of RFM from April 2015 to December 2016. Maternal characteristics, antenatal risk factors, management pathways and perinatal outcome studied.

Results: 47% belonged to high risk pregnancy. Among high risk women, although only 39% showed poor BPP at the first presentation, 58% were delivered irrespective of their gestational age, out of which 32.75% had poor neonatal outcome. Among low risk who had >2 episodes of RFM, 50% had poor neonatal outcome. 7% among high risk pregnancies and 18% among low risk, presented with RFM within 48 hours following steroid prophylaxis.24% of high risk women showed liquor volume abnormalities as compared to low risk (6.3%).

Conclusions: Significant proportion of those with RFM belonged to high risk pregnancy. Among high risk group, there were high rates of stillbirth and poor BPP at the time of admission when compared to low risk group. Due to early approach to the hospital and timely intervention, significant women with abnormal BPP had good perinatal outcome. All those fetuses who were delivered on first episode of RFM in low risk group did not show evidence of compromise at birth, probably indicating unnecessary delivery. More than 2 episodes of RFM even among low risk group seems significant as good number of fetuses were compromised at birth. Steroids prophylaxis for the fetal lung maturity causes transient changes in BPP, hence unnecessary delivery should be avoided especially those among low risk pregnancy.


O’Sullivan O, Stephen G, Martindale E, Heazell AEP. Predicting poor perinatal outcome in women who present with decreased fetal movements. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;29(8):705-710.

Sergent F, Lefevre A. Verspyck E, Marpeau L. Decreased fetal movements in the third trimester: what to do? Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2005;33(11):861-9

Efkarpidis S, Alexopoulos E, Kean L. Liu D, Fay T. Case–control study of factors associated with intrauterine fetal deaths. Medscape General Med. 2004;6(2):53.

Saastad E, Vangen S, Froen JF. Suboptimal care in stillbirths - a retrospective audit study”. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(4):444-50.

Winje BA, Saastad E, Gunnes N, Tveit JV, Stray‑Pedersen B, Flenady V, et al. Analysis of ‘count‑to‑ten’ fetal movement charts: A prospective cohort study. BJOG. 2011;118:1229‑38.

Saastad E, Winje BA, Stray Pedersen B, Froen JF. Fetal movement counting improved identification of fetal growth restriction and perinatal outcomes‑‑a multi‑center, randomized, controlled trial. PLoS One. 2011;6:e28482.

Mangesi L, Hofmeyr GJ, Smith V, Smyth RM. Cochrane Collaboration. Fetal movement counting for assessment of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;10: CD004909.

Sheikh M, Hantoushzadeh S, Shariat M. Maternal perception of decreased fetal movements from maternal and fetal perspectives, a cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:286.

Olagbuji BN, Igbarumah S, Akintayo AA, Olofinbiyi BA, Aduloju PO, Alao OO. Maternal understanding of fetal movement in third trimester: A means for fetal monitoring and reducing stillbirth. Nigerian J Clinic Pract. 2014;17(4):489-494.

Claire M, Meaney S, O’Donoghue K. Perinatal outcomes of reduced fetal movements: a cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:169.

Andrea MP, Tomasina S, Robin C and Lesley M. E. M. Maternal knowledge of fetal movements in late pregnancy. Australian New Zealand J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;52(5):445-9.

Anne ML, Colleen M. Lynne M. Fetal movement monitoring: how are we doing as educators? J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013;35(1):22-28.

Simone L, Kees B, Hans W, Sander K, Jeanette KV, Eduard JH. Short-Term (0–48 H) Effects of Maternal Betamethasone Administration on Fetal Heart Rate and its Variability. Pediatric Res. 2005;57(4):545-9.

Elizabeth GV, Susan T, Deborah AW. Low amniotic fluid index as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome. J Perinatol. 2002;22:282-5.

Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (RCOG) Reduced Fetal Movements. Green-top guideline No 57. 2011. Available at https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg57/






Original Research Articles