DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20163406

Knowledge on risk factors of uterine prolapse among reproductive age group women of Bajrabarahi Municipality of Lalitpur, Nepal

Devendra Raj Singh, Sandhya Lama, Santosh Maharjan

Abstract


Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a most common gynecological health problem contributing to maternal morbidity and mortality among women of reproductive age in developing countries. In Nepal prevalence of uterus prolapse among reproductive age women is around 17-27%. Still large numbers of rural Nepalese women are deprived of access to early diagnosis and quality treatment services related uterus prolapse. The present study was conducted with the aims to assess knowledge on risk factors on uterine prolapse among the reproductive age group of women who have at least one child below five years of age and residing at Bajrabarahi municipality of Lalitpur district.

Methods: This is a cross sectional descriptive study. Total 185 individuals were randomly selected from the list of safe motherhood register book of Bajrabarahi municipality for the interview. Semi-structured questionnaire was used as tools to collect data from study participants. Data collected was entered in Epi-data and data analysis was done using SPSS 16.0 version. Bivariate analysis was done using Chi-Square test to find the association between the selected variables of the study.

Results: The study results shows that out of total 46.5% of respondents have adequate knowledge and 53.5% of respondents have inadequate knowledge regarding risk factors of uterus prolapse. The study results explicitly reflects the knowledge on risk factors of uterus prolapse is significantly associated with the age of respondent (p=0.021), age at marriage of respondents (p=0.011), education status of respondents (p=0.001) and age at first child birth of respondent (p=0.001).

Conclusions: Though majority of respondents have heard about uterus prolapse, very few participants have in-depth or adequate knowledge about risk factors of uterus prolapse. Still extensive efforts of government and non-government organizations are essential to improve maternal health status of rural Nepalese women.


Keywords


Uterus prolapse, Knowledge, Risk factors, Reproductive age women, Nepal

Full Text:

PDF

References


Walker GJA, Gunasekera P. Pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence in developing countries: review of prevalence and risk factors. Int Urogynecology J. 2011;22(2):127-35.

Gunasekera P, Sazaki J, Walker G. Pelvic organ prolapse: don't forget developing countries. Lancet. 2007;369(9575):1789-90.

Kuncharapu I, Majeroni BA, Johnson DW. Pelvic organ prolapse. American family physician. 2010;81(9):1111-7.

Barber MD, Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecology J. 2013;24(11):1783-90.

Gurung G, Rana AA, Bista A, Joshi DK, Jamuna AB. Pelvic organ prolapse in rural Nepalese women of reproductive age groups: what makes it so common? Nepal J Obst Gynae. 2007;2(2):35-41.

Shrestha B, Devkota B, Khadka BB. Knowledge on uterine prolapse among married women of reproductive age in Nepal. Int J Women Health. 2014;6:771-9.

Unnecessary burden: gender discrimination and uterine prolapse in Nepal. Available at file:/// C:/Users/india/Downloads /asa310012014en.pdf. Accessed on 12 February 2016.

Clinical Protocol for Management of Pelvic organ Prolapse: Clinical Protocol. Kathamndu. Family Health Division, Government of Nepal. 2012.

Institute of Medicine. Reproductive morbidity report on clinic based survey: status of reproductive morbidities in Nepal. Kathamndu. 2006.

Shrestha ADL, Sharma B, Jyoti. Prevalence of uterine prolapse amongst gynecology OPD patients in Tribhuvan University teaching hospital in Nepal and its socio‐ cultural determinants. Kathmandu, Nepal. 2012.

NAPOPM-Nepal. National alliance for pelvic organ prolapse management-Nepal: Nepal joint- submission to the United Nations committee on economic, social and cultural rights. Kathamndu. 2014.

Gyhagen M, Bullarbo M, Nielsen TF, Milsom I. Prevalence and risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery. BJOG. Int J Obst Gynae. 2013;120(2):152-60.

Adler BB, Shrivastava C, Bodner K. Risk factors for uterine prolapse in Nepal. Int Urogyne J Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. 2007;18(11):1343-6.

Nepal demographic and health survey 2011. Available at http:// dhsprogram.com /pubs/pdf /FR257/FR257%5B13April2012%5D.pdf. Accessed on 12 February 2016.

UNFPA. Health related quality of life of women suffering from pelvic organ prolapse: before and 9 to 11 months after surgical interventions. Lalitpur, Nepal. Available at http:// nepal.unfpa.org /sites /asiapacific/files/pub-pdf/UNFPA-QualityBook-Final-ALL.pdf.2013. Accessed on 12 February 2016.

Radl CMR, Aro R. Uterine prolapse prevention in Eastern Nepal: the perspectives of women and health care professionals. International J Womens Health. 2012;4:373-82.

Ministry of Health and Population (MOHP). ICF International Inc. Nepal Demogrpahic Health Survey 2011. Calverton, Maryland. 2012.

Sita KA, Neraula. Awareness regarding uterovaginal prolapse among newar parous women. Int J Nursing Research Practice. 2014;1(1):15-9.

Ragini KS, Chauhan. Socio-cultural aspects of reproductive morbidities among rural women in districts of Maharastha, India. Journal Family Welfare. 2009;55(2):27-33.

Shrestha BO, Choulagai B, Shrestha KB, Petzold M, Krettek A. Knowledge, prevalence and treatment practices of uterine prolapse among women of reproductive age in the Jhaukhel- Duwakot health demographic surveillance site, Bhaktapur, Nepal. J Kathamndu Med College. 2014;3(4):136-43.

Baruwal AS, Pradhan R, Samita. Knowledge, attitude and preventive measures amongst married women of reproductive age towards uterine prolapse in the eight villages of surkhet district of Nepal. J Health Res. 2011;25(3):129-34.

Lyatoshinskaya P, Gumina D, Popov A, Koch M, Hagmann M, Umek W. Knowledge of pelvic organ prolapse in patients and their information-seeking preferences: comparing Vienna and Moscow. Int Urogyne J. 2016:1-8.