DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20175822

M-health for maternal health- bridging the gaps!!

Sheeba Marwah, Pratima Mittal

Abstract


This article reviews significance, potential and principles to consider when setting up a telemedicine (TM) program to provide care to women in the field of obstetrics and gynecology, essentially deploying mobile technology. There are various benefits of such TM clinical applications. The consensus among patients and health care providers is that this technology is convenient to provide needed subspecialty medical care, even when it is not available locally. Such innovations are clinically successful, but economic and cost-effectiveness data are lacking.


Keywords


Gynecology, Mobile health, Obstetrics, Telemedicine, Telehealth

Full Text:

PDF

References


Public Health. Focus on mHealth: WHO mHealth Technical Advisory Group for evidence in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health. K4 Health Newsletter Special Supplement. 2013;1(2).

Fraser H, Bailey C, Sinha C, Mehl G, Labrique AB. Call to action on global eHealth evaluation: consensus statement of the WHO Global eHealth Evaluation Meeting, Bellagio;September 2011.

World Health Organization (WHO). The world health report 2000 – health systems: improving performance. Geneva: WHO; 2000. Available at: http://www.who.int/whr/2000/en/

Travis P, Bennett S, Haines A, Pang T, Butta Z, Hyder AA et al. Overcoming health-systems constraints to achieve the Millennium Development Goals. Lancet. 2004; 364(9437):900-6.

Center for Innovation and Technology in Public Health, Public Health Institute; mHealth Alliance. Leveraging mobile technologies to promote maternal and newborn health: the current landscape and opportunities for advancements in low-resource settings. Washington, DC: mHealth Alliance; [2012]. Available at: http://www.healthunbound.org/sites/default/files/ uploads/leveraging_mobile_technologies_to_promote_maternal_newborn_health.pdf

Field MJ. Telemedicine: a guide to assessing telecommunications for health care. Washing-ton, DC: National Academy Press;1996.

Greiner AL. Telemedicine Applications in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;60(4):853-66.

Bashshur R, Shannon G, Krupinski E, Grigsby J. The taxonomy of telemedicine. Telemed J E Health. 2011;17(6):484-94.

Asch DA. The hidden economics of telemedicine. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163:801-2.

Earth Institute, Columbia University. Barriers and gaps affecting mHealth in low and middle-income countries: a policy white paper. Washington, DC: mHealth Alliance; 2010. Available at http://cghed.ei.columbia.edu/sitefiles/file/ m Health Barriers White PaperFINAL.pdf

MCTS (Mother and Child Tracking System) [Internet]. India: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Department of Health and Family Welfare, National Rural Health Mission (NRHM); [cited 2013 Mar 13]. Available at http://nrhm-mcts.nic.in/MCH/2

Tamrat T, Kachnowski S. Special delivery: an analysis of mHealth in maternal and newborn health programs and their outcomes around the world. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16(5):1092-1101.

MAMA: Mobile Alliance for Maternal Action [Internet].Washington, DC: United Nations Foundation; c2013 [cited 2013 Mar 13]. Available at: http://mobilemamaalliance.org/

Labrique AB, Vasudevan L, Kochi E, Fabricant R, Mehl G. mHealth innovations as health system strengthening tools: 12 common applications and a visual framework. Global Health: Sci Pract. 2013;1(2):160-71

Derenzi B, Borriello G, Jackson J, Kumar VS, Parikh TS, Virk P, et al. Mobile phone tools for field-based health care workers in low-income countries. Mt Sinai J Med. 2011;78(3):406-18.

Butler Tobah YS. OB nest: a novel approach to prenatal care. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127:7S-8S.

Beatty Y. Current telemedicine landscape in Tennessee. Tennessee Med. 2015;108:23-27.

Okoroh EM, Kroelinger CD, Smith AM, Goodman DA, Barfield WD. US and territory telemedicine policies: identifying gaps in perinatal care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:e1-772.e6.