DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20180019

Sperm recovery and IVF outcome after surgical sperm retrieval in azoospermia: our experience

Seema Rai, P. S. Rao, Prajwal S.

Abstract


Background: In the last decade, male factor infertility has been recognized as a significant global problem, which is on an increase. Till date, very few options are available for ameliorating male factor infertility. Development of intracytoplasmic sperm injection has revolutionized the treatment of males with very low sperm counts or with poor quality sperm. However, patients with a diagnosis of azoospermia had no option but to resort to adoption or use of donor sperm. The clinical management of men with azoospermia seeking fertility has been a challenge for andrologists, urologists, and reproductive medicine specialists alike. The older approaches denied such couple the possibility of having own genetic children. Surgical sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection have successfully transformed the treatment of male infertility so that now most of the men can father their own children. The aim of this study is to present the outcome of IVF with surgically retrieved sperm from azoospermic men.

Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of 100 cycles using surgically retrieved sperm. Outcome measures were fertilization rate (FR) and implantation rate (IR) per transfer.

Results: Sperm retrieval rate in our study was 76% when Per cutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA) and Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) are combined. Our data demonstrated similar outcome between the use of epididymal or testicular sperm in men with azoospermic. There was no statistical difference concerning fertilization rate, embryo quality and pregnancy rate between ICSI with surgically retrieved sperm and ejaculated sperms.

Conclusions: Surgical sperm retrieval is a feasible and successful procedure. Spermatozoa can be retrieved from the testis in up to 76% of patients, even in cases with severe disorders of spermatogenesis and deranged hormonal profile. Comprehensive genetic counseling is important for infertile couples deciding for surgical sperm retrieval, since genetic disorders, as yet undetected, may be passed on to the following generation with multiplying variety.

 


Keywords


Azoospermia, Cryptozoospermia, Percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration, Surgical sperm retrieval, Testicular sperm extraction

Full Text:

PDF

References


World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. 5th ed. 2010. Available at http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44261/1/9789241547789_eng.pdf

Aziz N. The importance of semen analysis in the context of azoospermia. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013;68(Suppl 1):35-8.

Esteves SC. Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination. Int Braz J Urol. 2014;40:443-53.

Esteves SC, Miyaoka R, Agarwal A. An update on the clinical assessment of the infertile male. Clinics. 2011;66(4):691-700.

Samplaski MK, Lo K, Grober E, Jarvi K. Finasteride use in the male infertility population: Effects on semen and hormone parameters. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:1542-6.

Baker K, Sabanegh E. Obstructive azoospermia: reconstructive techniques and results. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013;68(Suppl 1):61-73.

Esteves SC, Lee W, Benjamin DJ, Seol B, Verza A, Jr. Reproductive potential including neonatal outcomes of men with obstructive azoospermia undergoing percutaneous sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection according to the cause of obstruction. J Urol. 2013;189:232-7.

Miyaoka R, Esteves SC. Predictive factors for sperm retrieval and sperm injection outcomes in obstructive azoospermia: do etiology, retrieval techniques and gamete source play a role? Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013;68(Suppl 1):111-9.

Esteves SC, Agarwai A. The azoospermic male: current knowledge and future perspectives. Clinics. (Sao Paulo) 2013;68(Suppl 1):1-4.

Hung AJ, King P, Schlegel PN. Uniform testicular maturation arrest: a unique subset of men with nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol. 2007;178:608-12.

Sokol RZ, Swerdloff RS. Endocrine evaluation. In: Lipshultz LI, Howards SS, editors. Infertility in the Male. 3rd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1997:210–8.

Gudeloglu A, Parekattil SJ. Update in the evaluation of the azoospermic male. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013;68(Suppl 1):27-34.

Esteves SC, Hamada A, Kondray V, Pitchika A, Agarwal A. What every gynecologist should know about male infertility: an update. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286:217-29.

Lee R, Li PS, Goldstein M, Tanrikut C, Schattman G, Schlegel PN. A decision analysis of treatments for obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(9):2043-9.

Lee R, Li PS, Schlegel PN, Goldstein M. Reassessing reconstruction in the management of obstructive azoospermia: reconstruction or sperm acquisition? Urol Clin North Am. 2008; 35(2): 289-301.

Ozkavukcu S, Ibis E, Kizil S, Isbacar S, Aydos K. A laboratory modification to testicular sperm preparation technique improves spermatogenic cell yield. Asian J Androl. 2014;16:852–7.

van Peperstraten A, Proctor ML, Johnson NP, Philipson G. Techniques for surgical retrieval of sperm prior to intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for azoospermia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008.

Esteves SC, Miyaoka R, Orosz JE, Agarwal A. An update on sperm retrieval techniques for azoospermic males. Clinics [Sao Paulo]. 2013:68 Suppl 1:99-110

Esteves SC, Miyaoka R, Agarwal A. Sperm retrieval techniques for assisted reproduction. Int Braz J Urol. 2011;37:570-83.

Verheyen Greta Outcomes, safety and effectiveness for cryopreservation of ejaculated, testicular and epididymal sperm. Centre for Reproductive Medicine UZ Brussel, Belgium. ALPHA Conference Budapest 30th April - 2nd. May 2010. Available at http://www.brusselsivf.be/dissertations.

Naredi N, Agrawal. A Testicular sperm extraction: can we combat both obstructive and non obstructive azoospermia?. Endocrinol Metab Syndr. 2016;5:218.

Esteves SC, Lee W, Benjamin DJ, Seol B, Verza S Jr, Agarwal A. Reproductive potential of men with obstructive azoospermia undergoing percutaneous sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection according to the cause of obstruction. J Urol. 2013;189(1):232-7.

Fahmy I, Mansour R, Aboulghar M, Serour G, Kamal A, Tawab NA et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection using surgically retrieved epididymal and testicular spermatozoa in cases of obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia. Int J Androl. 1997;20:37-44.

Palermo GD, Sclegel PN, Hariprashad JJ, Ergun B, Mienik A, Zaninovic N et al. Fertilisation and pregnancy outcome with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for azoospermic men. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:741-8.

Nicopoullos JDM, Gilling-Smith C, Almeida PA, Ramsay JWA. The results of 154 ICSI cycles using surgically retrieved sperm from azoospermic men. HumReprod. 2004;19(3):579-85.

Kamal A, Fahmy I, Mansour R, Serour G, Aboulghar M, Ramos L, et al. Does the outcome of ICSI in cases of obstructive azoospermia depend on the origin of the retrieved spermatozoa or the cause of obstruction? A comparative analysis. Fertil Steril. 2010;94 (6):2135-40.

Abdel-Meguid TA. Predictors of sperm recovery and azoospermia relapse in men with nonobstructive azoospermia after varicocele repair. J Urol. 2012;187(1):222-6.

Ran R, Kohn TP, Ramasamy R. Innovation in surgical management of non obstructive azoospermia. Indian J Urol. 2016;32(1):15-20.

Kumar M, Kumar K, Jain S, Hassan T, Dada R. Novel insights into the genetic and epigenetic paternal contribution to the human embryo. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013;68(Suppl 1):5-14.