Successful laparoscopic assisted myomectomy of a gigantic 9.4 kg uterine parasitic myoma: a case report and review of literature

Authors

  • B. B. Dash Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Max Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
  • Anuradha Kapur Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Max Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
  • Anupama Bahadur Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Max Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20180935

Keywords:

Giant uterine myoma, Laparoscopy, Morcellation, Myomectomy

Abstract

Uterine leiomyomas are the most common benign tumours of the female pelvis affecting around 25-30% women of reproductive age. A case of successful laparoscopic assisted myomectomy in a giant uterine parasitic myoma is presented. A 42-year nulliparous morbidly obese lady presented with an Ultrasound diagnosis of a large uterine mass, detected during routine health check-up. MRI revealed a giant uterine pedunculated myoma of size 35 × 28 × 18 cm arising from the fundus and a 6 × 7 cm posterior wall myoma. After counselling the patient regarding surgical and anaesthesia risk, need of hysterectomy and laparotomy, laparoscopic myomectomy was planned. Laparoscopic findings revealed an exceptionally large parasitic fundal myoma filling the whole abdominal cavity and another 7 × 6 cm subserous myoma. main technical challenge was to tackle the big feeding vessels from the omentum providing massive blood supply to the gigantic tumor. Laparoscopic myomectomy was completed successfully using harmonic ace for coagulating the giant feeding vessels from the omentum. As the size of myoma was too big to put in the morcellation bag, so specimen retrieval was done through small incision and manual morcellation. The weight of the specimen was 9.4 Kg. This case emphasizes that size does not pose a limit to removing these gigantic myomas laparoscopically when surgical expertise and good anaesthesia facility is available. This is the case of largest myoma managed laparoscopically.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Zimmermann A, Bernuit D, Gerlinger C, Schaefers M, Geppert K. Prevalence, symptoms and management of uterine fibroids: an international internet- based survey of 21,746 women. BMC Womens Health. 2012;12:6

Chittawar BP, Franik S, Pouwer AW, Farquhar C. Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;10:CD004638.

Aksoy H, Aydin T, Özdamar Ö, Karadag ÖI, Aksoy U. Successful use of laparoscopic myomectomy to remove a giant uterine myoma: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2015;9:286.

Sinha R, Hegde A, Warty N, Patil N. Laparoscopic excision of very large myomas. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003;10(4):461-8.

Yoon HJ, Kyung MS, Jung US, Choi JS. Laparoscopic myomectomy for large myomas. J Korean Med Sci. 2007;22(4):706-12.

Okolo S. Incidence, aetiology and epidemiology of uterine fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;22(4):571-88.

He Y, Zeng Q, Li X, Liu B, Wang P. The association between subclinical atherosclerosis and uterine fibroids. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57089-e57089.

He Y, Zeng Q, Dong S, Qin L, Li G, Wang P. Associations between uterine fibroids and lifestyles including diet, physical activity and stress: a case control study in China. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2013;22(1):109-117

McKenna JB, Kanade T, Choi S, Tsai BP, Rosen DM, Cario GM, et al. The Sydney contained in bag morcellation technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(6):984-5.

Kavallaris A, Zygouris D, Chalvatzas N, Terzakis E. Laparoscopic myomectomy of a giant myoma. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2013;40(1):178-80.

Ovalı S, Zorlu CG. Laparoscopic Myomectomy of A Giant Myoma. Zeynep Kamil Med Bull. 2014;45:175-7.

Downloads

Published

2018-02-27

How to Cite

Dash, B. B., Kapur, A., & Bahadur, A. (2018). Successful laparoscopic assisted myomectomy of a gigantic 9.4 kg uterine parasitic myoma: a case report and review of literature. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 7(3), 1265–1268. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20180935

Issue

Section

Case Reports