DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20180896

Instrumental delivery: a comparative study in a tertiary care hospital

Bhanu B. T., Anitha G. S.

Abstract


Background: To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes of vacuum versus forceps application in assisted vaginal delivery.

Methods: Women in labor with vertex presentation were delivered by indicated/propylactic vacuum or forceps. A total of 500 cases were included in this retrospective study. Maternal and neonatal morbidity were compared in terms of perineal lacerations, episiotomy extension, post-partum hemorrhage, Apgar score, neonatal jaundice, perinatal mortality, NICU admissions etc. Chi square test was used to analyze the data.

Results: Maternal morbidity was significant in the forceps group. With regards to neonatal morbidity, in NICU admissions, statistically significant difference was noted.

Conclusions: Vacuum and forceps should remain appropriate tools in the modern obstetrics. However, ventouse may be chosen first (if there is no fetal distress) as it is significantly less likely to injure the mother and decrease NICU admissions.


Keywords


Instrumental deliveries, Forceps, Ventouse

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anonymous. Vacuum versus forceps. (Editorial). Lancet. 1984;1:144.

Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ. Births: final data for 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;64: 1-65.

Johanson RB, Rice C, Doyle M, Arthur J, Anyanwu L, Ibrahim J, et al. A randomised prospective study comparing the new vacuum extractor policy with forceps delivery. Intern J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;100(6):524-30.

Caughey AB, Sandberg PL, Zlatnik MG, Thiet MP, Parer JT, Laros RK. Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(3):740.

Wu Wen S, Shiliang L, Kramer SM. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes between vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153:103-7.

Johanson RB, Menon BK. Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD000224.

O’Mahony F, Hofmeyr GJ, Menon V. Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010:11. Art No: CD005455.DOI10.1002/14651858.CD005455.pub2. (meta-analysis)

Demissie K, Rhoads GG, Smulian JC, Balasubramanian BA, Gandhi K, Joseph KS, et al. Operative vaginal delivery and neonatal and infant adverse outcomes: population based retrospective analysis. BMJ. 2004;329(7456):24.

Gardella C, Taylor M, Benedetti T, Hitti J, Critchlow C. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(4):896-902.

Lamba A, Kaur R, Muzafar Z. An observational study to evaluate the maternal and neonatal outcome of forceps delivery in a tertiary care government hospital of a cosmopolitan city of India. Res Obstet Gynecol. 2016;20(17):24.

Prameela RC, Prajwal S. Assisted vaginal delivery, Forceps, Ventouse. Outcome of instrumental vaginal deliveries in referred cases. JEMDS. 2015;4(19):3275-80.