DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20180905

Effect of cardiac surgery on maternal and perinatal outcome in rheumatic heart disease with pregnancy: a comparative study

Vikas Yadav, J. B. Sharma, Garima Kachhawa, Alka Kriplani, Reeta Mahey, Venus Dalal, Isha Kriplani

Abstract


Background: Rheumatic heart disease remains the commonest heart disease in India with mitral stenosis being the most common lesion and is associated with significant maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. The objective of this study was to compare maternal and perinatal outcome in women with rheumatic heart valvular disease who had no surgery or had percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty (PBMV) or had valvular replacement surgery.

Methods: It was a retrospective study in 113 women with rheumatic heart disease with various valvular lesion admitted in the hospital in previous 10 years. There were 58 (51.35%) patients without cardiac surgery (Group 1), 24 (21.23%) with PTMC (Group 2) and 31 (27.43%) with valve replacement surgery (Group 3). Maternal and perinatal outcome were compared in three groups.

Results: The baseline characteristics were similar in the three group. In cardiac complications New York Heart Association (NYHA) deterioration was significantly higher (24.1%) in non-operated group (Group 1) as compared to Group 2 (12.3%) and Group 3 (16.1%). There was no difference in Group 2 and Group 3. Need of cardiac medication (digoxin) was also highest (67.2%) in Group 1 as compared to Group 2 (24.6%) (p = 0.002) and Group 3 (38.7%) (p = 0.001) but no difference in Group 2 and Group 3. Anticoagulant were given to significantly higher number (54.8% of cases in Group 3 (valve replacement) as compared to Group 1 (3.4%) and Group 2 (12.5%). There was no significant difference in obstetric events and mode of delivery in the three groups. Similarly, there was no difference in fetal outcome in the three groups as regard to mean birth weight, APGAR score, fetal growth restriction, fetal or neonatal death or congenital anomalies in the three groups.

Conclusions: Cardiac surgery before or during pregnancy did not significantly improve maternal or perinatal outcome. Only cardiac events and need of medication was reduced with surgery. Hence surgery should be performed judiciously in selected cases.


Keywords


PBMV, Rheumatic heart disease, Valvular replacement surgery

Full Text:

PDF

References


Malhotra M, Sharma JB, Arora P. Mitral valve surgery and maternal and fetal outcome in valvular heart disease. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2003;81:151-6.

Gupta A, Yash Y. Balloon mitral valvotomy in pregnancy: maternal and fetal outcomes. J Am Col Surg. 1998;187:409-15.

Warnes CA. Pregnancy and heart disease.: Braunwald’s Heart Disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine. 9th ed. Elsevier; 2011:1770-1782.

McAnulty JH. Heart disease and pregnancy. In: Hurst the Heart. 13th ed. 2011:2146-2158.

Desai DK, Lawo AM, Naidoo DP. Mitral stenosis in pregnancy: a five-year experience at King Edward. BJOG. 2000;107:953-7.

Deans CL, Uebing A, Stear P. Cardiac disease in pregnancy. In Studd J, Tan SL, Chervenak FA. cedss Progress in Obstetrics and Gynaecology Elsevier, Edinburgh; 2006;17:164-182

Malhotra M, Sharma J B, Tripathi R, Arora P. Mitral valve surgery and maternal and fetal outcome in valvular heart disease. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2004;84:11-16

Sawhney H, Aggarwal N, Suri V. Maternal and perinatal outcome in rheumatic heart disease. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2003;80:9.

Jose AM, de Souza, Eulogio E. Percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty in comparison with pen mitral valve commissurotomy for mitral stenosis during pregnancy. J Am Col Card. 2001;37:900.

A´ vila WS, Grinberg M, De´court LV, Bellotti G, Pileggi F. Evolution of mitral stenosis carriers in the pregnancy-puerperal cycle. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1992;58:359-64.

Nercolini DC, Bueno RRL, Guerios E, Tarastchuck JC, Kubrusly LF. Percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty in pregnant women with mitral stenosis. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent. 2002;57:318-22.

Goon MS, Raman S, Sinnathuray TA. Closed mitral valvotomy in pregnancy: a Malayasian experience. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987;27:173-7.

Inoue K, Owaki T, Nakamura T, Kitamura F, Miyamoto N. Clinical application of transvenous mitral commissurotomy by a new balloon catheter. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1984;87:394-402.

Vinayakumar D, Vinod GV, Madhavan S, Krishnan MN. Maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women undergoing balloon mitral valvotomy for rheumatic mitral stenosis. Indian Heart J. 2016;68(6):780-2.

Mishra S, Narang R, Sharma M. Percutaneous transseptal mitral commissurotomy in pregnant women with critical mitral stenosis. Indian Heart J. 2001; 53:192-6.

Singh Y, Manjunath C, Nanjappa. Immediate and intermediate-term out-comes of percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy during pregnancy: our experience with accura balloon at a high-volume center. Indian Heart J. 2013;65:S33-93.

Gulzare A, Kurdi W, Niaz FA. Mitral balloon valvuloplasty during pregnancy: the long term up to 17 years obstetric outcome and childhood development. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;30:86-90.

Wasim T, Amer W, Majrroh A. Fetomaternal outcome of pregnancy with cardiac disease. J Pak Med Assoc. 2008;58:175-8.

Mihaljevic T, Paul S, Leacche M, Rawn JD, Cohn LH, Byrne JG. Valve replacement in women of childbearing age: influences on mother, fetus and neonate. J Heart Valve Dis. 2005;14(2):151-7.

Bhatla N, Lal S, Behera G, Kriplani A, Mittal S, et al. Cardiac disease in pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2003;82:153-9.