DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20181338

Development of antenatal psychosocial stress scale for pregnant women in Kerala, India

R. Devisree, C. Nirmala, P. S. Indu, S. Remadevi

Abstract


Background: Psychosocial stress in pregnancy, defined as, “the imbalance that a pregnant woman feels when she cannot cope with demands is expressed both behaviourally and physiologically”. The purpose of this study was to develop a culturally appropriate and locally relevant scale for measuring antenatal psychosocial stress.

Methods: Cross sectional design was used for the study. Participants were antenatal women attending outpatient department of both government and private sector. Twenty-nine item questionnaires to identify psychosocial stress among antenatal women was developed by conducting focus group discussions and in-depth interviews among socioeconomically diverse population and different parity and among uncomplicated and complicated pregnancies. By administering the questionnaire among 190 participants, Reliability and Validity were estimated. Factor analysis was done for item reduction. Poor loading, wrong loading and cross loading items were removed from the questionnaire. Convergent validity assessed with prenatal psychosocial stress scale among 55 antenatal women.

Results: The final questionnaire has 10 items. Item-total correlation was found to be greater than 0.2 for all the items. The internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach's alpha) for the 29-item questionnaire was 0.878. Test-retest reliability was 0.98 (95% CI 0.96-0.99). Further, factor analysis was done to demonstrate construct validity. The interrater reliability was 0.98 (95% CI- 0.96-0.99).

Conclusions: Based on analysis of psychometric properties, the conclusion is that the 10 items questionnaire is a reliable, simple, valid and easy to administer tool for use among antenatal women of all settings.


Keywords


Item analysis, Pregnancy, Psychosocial stress, Reliability, Validity

Full Text:

PDF

References


ACOG committee psychosocial risk factors perinatal screening and Intervention. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:469-77.

Neggers Y, Goldenberg R, Cliver S, Hauth J. The relationship between psychosocial profile, health practices, and pregnancy outcomes. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2006;85(3):277-85.

Woods SM, Melville JL, Guo Y, Fan MY, Gavin A. Psychosocial stress during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jan 1;202(1):61-e1.

Kazi Z, Fatmi J, Hatcher U. Niaz-Development of a stress scale for pregnant women in the South Asian context: the A-Z Stress scale. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/117646/1/15_2_2009_0353_0361.pdf.

Harville EW, Savitz DA, Dole N, Herring AH, Thorp JM. Stress questionnaires and stress biomarkers during pregnancy. J Women's Health. 2009;18(9):1425-33.

Zdziennicki A. Fear as a risk factor in perinatology. Wiadomosci lekarskie (Warsaw, Poland: 1960). 1994 Sep;47(17-18):698-9.

Gupton A, Heaman M, Cheung LW. Complicated and uncomplicated pregnancies: women’s perception of risk. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nursing. 2001;30(2):192-201.

Hoffman NS. Stress factors related to antenatal testing during pregnancy. J Perinatol. 1990;10(2):195-7.

Kang JH. A study on fear and anxiety of pregnancy women . Journal of Korean Academic Nursing. 1980;10(2):1-12.

Kmita G, Barańska M, Ciastoń-Przecławska E, Cerańska-Goszczyńska H, Urmańska W. Psychological aspects of high risk pregnancy in hospitalized women--toward the change of the existing model of care. Ginekologia polska. 1998;69(12):1025-31.

Rickert VI, Wiemann CM, Goodrum LA, Berenson AB. Employment and health-risk behaviors among pregnant adolescents. J Pediat Adol Gynecol. 1998;11(2):79-84.

Landisbergis. Women work and well-being. J Health Social Behavior. 1996;33(8):200-4.

Chandola T, Martikainen P, Bartley M, Lahelma E, Marmot M, Micikazu S, et al. Does conflict between home and work explain the effect of multiple roles on mental health. J Epidemiol. 2000;10(1):68-74.

Homer CJ. Work related psychosocial stress and risk of preterm baby. Am J Public Health. 1990;80(2): 173-7.

Zhu JL, Hjollund NH, Andersen AM, Olsen J. Shift work, job stress, and late fetal loss: The National Birth Cohort in Denmark. J Occup environmental Med. 2004 1;46(11):1144-9.

Wilson LM, Reid AJ, Midmer DK, Biringer A, Carroll JC, Stewart DE. Antenatal psychosocial risk factors associated with adverse postpartum family outcomes. CMAJ. 1996;154(6):785.

Goldstein KM, Martin SL. Intimate partner physical assault before and during pregnancy: how does it relate to women's psychological vulnerability?. Violence and victims. 2004 Aug 1;19(4):387.