DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20180959

Effect of male child preference on the decision making of women in choosing contraception

Varuna Pathak, Ruchika Arya

Abstract


Background: Pressures resulting from unrestrained human population growth put demands on the natural world that can overwhelm any efforts to achieve a sustainable future. If we are to halt the destruction of our environment, we must accept limits to that growth. In this hospital based study, we aim to study the factors that influence the choice of contraception. Purpose of this study is to analyze the contraceptive behavior which is a product of many determinants such as age, religion, education, parity, fertility, child care support, economic and social circumstances, motivation, communication and the perception of reliability and safety of a chosen method thereby ensuring better health for the mother and better care and upbringing of children.

Methods: The present study entitled effect of male child preference on the decision making of women in choosing contraception is a cross sectional study carried out on 700 subjects in Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sultania Zanana Hospital, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal. Study population includes women of reproductive age group who came to seek contraceptive advice from family planning OPD of the hospital.

Results: Subjects having 2 male children preferred permanent method of contraception (66%) as compared to subjects having 2 female children (7.93%), this result is statistically significant(p<0.05) showing a strong preference for male child in Indian society.

Conclusions: The results indicated that a woman's desire to limit family size with preferred sex composition of children, coupled with her autonomy and the socio cultural context, are the major determinants of contraceptive method choices.


Keywords


Contraceptive method, Contraception, Male child preference, Socio cultural context

Full Text:

PDF

References


Family Planning 2020 (FP2020) FP2020 commitment to action 2014-2015. New York: FP2020;2015. Available at http://www.familyplanning2020.org/resources/13569

Paxman J, Rizo A, Brown L, Benson J. The clandestine epidemic: the practice of unsafe abortion in Latin America. Stud Fam Plan. 1993;24:206-14.

Shukla P. A study on utilization of family planning practices and there side effect among the urban slum population. J Com Med. 2010;6(1).

Govt of India (2012). Census 2011, provisional population report, office of the registrar general and census commissioner India, Ministry of Home Affairs. 2011. Available at http://censusindia.gov.in/2011-prov-results/indiaatglance.html

National family health survey NFHS-3 India 2005-06 international institute for population sciences, Mumbai, India measure DHS+ ORS&MARCO. Available at https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FRIND3/FRIND3-Vol1AndVol2.pdf

Bose S, Trent K. Socio-demographic determinants of abortion in India: A North-South comparison. J Biosoc Sci. 2006;38:261-82.

Gentleman A. India’s lost daughters: Abortion toll in millions. The New York Times. 2006 Jan 9. Available at http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/09/world/asia/indias-lost-daughters-abortion-toll-in-millions.html

Chan CL, Yip PS, Ng EH, Ho PC, Chan CH, Au JS. Gender Selection in China: its meaning and implications. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002;19:426-30

Sudha S, Indaya RS. Female demographic disadvantage in India 1981-1991. Sex selective abortions and female infanticide. Dev Change. 1999;30:585-618.

Arnold F, Kishore S, Roy TT. Sex selective abortions. Popul Dev Rev. 2002;28:759-85.