DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20181926

Observational study of HSG with laparoscopic correlation in infertility patients

Avinash Dubbewar, Saumen Kanti Nath

Abstract


Background: Uterine abnormalities contribute to 10% of infertility cases and 50% of women with recurrent early pregnancy loss whereas fallopian tube abnormalities contribute to 20% of such cases.

Methods: Total 61 patients of infertility and subfertility undergoing evaluation and treatment at our centre were selected for HSG. Total 25 patients from this group have undergone diagnostic laparoscopy, their findings were correlated with HSG findings retrospectively.

Results: All the patients in the study group were either primary or secondary infertility patients. Of the 61 patients of infertility, 49 were in primary infertility group and 12 were in secondary infertility group. The age of patients was between 23 and 35 years. The average duration of primary infertility was 5 years and secondary infertility was 3.5years. Total 61 patients underwent HSG, 42(68.8%) patients had normal findings and 19(31.14%) patients had abnormal findings. In abnormal findings 4(6.55%) were Mullerian abnormalities and 15(24.59%) were either unilateral or bilateral tubal block. Total 25 patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy out of 61 patients. The sensitivity of HSG was 90% and specificity was 60 % with positive predictive value of 60% and negative predictive value of 90% as compared to diagnostic laparoscopy. Tubal block was defined as any form of tubal occlusion detected at HSG and finally confirmed on laparoscopy.  In our laparoscopy findings, peri-adnexal adhesions were found in 5 (20%) of the blocked tubes on laparoscopy. Endometriosis was detected in 1 (4%) of the blocked tubes and suspected intra-tubal block in 2 (8%).Pelvic inflammatory disease was found to contribute in 3 (12%).

Conclusions: HSG demonstrates high sensitivity in our study. So, it should be used as the initial investigation for identifying uterine abnormality and tubal patency. As the specificity is less, we suggest that laparoscopy is necessary to recognize those cases of tubal block, which were unrecognized or wrongly recognized on HSG. In addition, the patients who were found to have tubal block on HSG, laparoscopy helps in finding the cause of infertility like existence of peritubal adhesions and endometriosis that can guide appropriate therapy.

 


Keywords


Bicornuate uterus, Hysterosalpingography, Laparoscopy, Tubal occlusion unicornuate uterus

Full Text:

PDF

References


Serafini P, Batzofin J. Diagnosis of female infertility. A comprehensive approach. J Reprod Med. 1989;34:29-40.

World Health Organization: Women and sexually transmitted infections. 2007. Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs110/en./Accessed August 21, 2010

Aliyu MH, Aliyu SH, Salihu HM. Female genital tuberculosis: a global review. Int J Fertility and Women's Medi. 2004;49:123-36.

Nezar M, Goda H, El-Negery M, El-Saied M, Wahab AA, Badawy AM. Genital tract tuberculosis among infertile women: an old problem revisited. Archives of Gynecol and Obstet. 2009;280:787-91.

American Society for Reproductive Medicine: Myomas and reproductive unction. Fertil Steril 90 (Suppl 3):S125, 2008b

Makker A, Goel MM: Uterine leiomyomas: e ects on architectural, cellular, and molecular determinants of endometrial receptivity. Reprod Sci. 2013; 20(6):631.

Metwally M, Cheong YC, Horne AW: Surgical removal of fibroids does not improve fertility outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11:CD003857.

Pritts EA. Fibroids and infertility: a systematic review of the evidence. Obstet and Gynecol survey. 2001;56:483-91.

Samejima T, Koga K, Nakae H, Wada-Hiraike O, Fujimoto A, Fujii T, Osuga Y. Identifying patients who can improve fertility with myomectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 185C:28,2014

Balasch J. Investigation of infertile couple: investigation of infertile couple in the era of assisted reproductive technology. A time for reappraisal Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2251-57.

Simon A, Laufer N. Unexplained infertility: a reappraisal. Ass Reprod Rev. 1993;3:26-36.

Brown SE, Coddington CC, Schnorr J, Toner JP, Gibbons W,Oehninger S. Evaluation of outpatient hysteroscopy, saline infusion hysterosonography in infertile women: a prospective, randomised study. Fertil Steril. 2000;74:1029-34.

Brunham RC, Maclean IW,Binnis B,Peeling RW. Chlamydia trachomatis:its role in tubal infertility. J Infect Dis. 1985.152:1275-82

Lindequist S, Justesen P, Larsen C, Rasmussen F. Diagnostic quality and complications of HSG: oil-versus water soluble contrast media-a randomised prospective study. Radiol. 1991.179:69-74.

Karande VC, Pratt DE, Balin MS, Levrant SG, Morris RS, Gleicher N. What is the radiation exposure to patients during a gynaecological procedure? Fertile steril. 1997;67(2):401-3.

Sciarra J. Infertility: an international health problem. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1994;46:155-63.

Population Council. Infertility. Looking back, looking forward: a profile of sexual and reproductive health in India. New Delhi, Population Council; 2004;67-72.

Jonathan S Berek. Bereks and Novaks Gynaecology-15th ed. 32;1157.

Marc A. Fritz Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility-8th ed: 27;1156.

Sharma R, Sharma V. The infertile woman: a study of 120 cases. J Indian Med Assoc. 1991;89:31-2.

Swart P, Mol BW, van der Veen F, van Beurden ,Redekop WK, Bossuyt PM. The accuracy of hysterosalpingography in diagnosis of tubal pathology: a metaanalysis. Fertil Steril. 1995; 64:486-91.

Gokhan G, Gamze Y, Oznur G, Isin K, Lale W, Birolt D. Hysterosalpingography, Laparoscopy or both in the diagnosis of tubal disease in infertility. World J Laparos Surg. 2008;1:23-26.

Rizvi SM, Ajaz S, Gulshan, Nikita, Anjum S, Inara. Comparison of Hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in diagnosis of tubal occlusion. Ann Int Med Den Res. 2016;2:165-8.