DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20181948

Post-partum intrauterine contraceptive device: acceptability and safety

Bhawna Tomar, Vandana Saini, Mamta Gupta

Abstract


Background: Antenatal period is the ideal time for counselling regarding contraception. PPIUCD is a long term reversible method for unmet need of contraception in women of reproductive age. The objectives of this study were to determine proportion of women accepting PPIUCD insertion, their socio-demographic, obstetrics characteristics, reason for acceptance, denial, rates of expulsion, complications and continuation rate till 10 weeks after insertion.

Methods: A prospective descriptive study on 300 consented women was done in 2012-2013. A structured questionnaire and performa were used to obtain data. PPIUCD (CuT380A) was inserted in these women and were followed up till 10 weeks post insertion.

Results: Out of 300 women counselled, only 85 accepted PPIUCD giving an acceptance rate of 28.33%. Women who had short inter-conceptional period or those who had previously used interval IUCD were significantly associated with greater acceptance. Fear of pain, heavy bleeding and infertility when planning next pregnancy were the most common reasons for denial. Continuation rate was 86.89% at 10th week after insertion. No major complication was observed i.e. perforation, infection and pregnancy.

Conclusions: PPIUCD is quite safe method of contraception. Adequate counselling and clarification of myths associated with PPIUCD use can help acceptance and meet the unmet needs of contraception in post-partum period and even later in reproductive age women.


Keywords


Acceptance for PPIUCD, Complications of PPIUCD, Continuation after PPIUCD, denial for PPIUCD, PPIUCD, Safety of PPIUD

Full Text:

PDF

References


Population of the world. Available at https://www.livepopulation.com/country/india.html

National Family and Health Survvey (NFHS-4), 2015-2016. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Government of India. Available at http://rchiips.org/NFHS/NFHS-4Reports/India.pdf

Rutstein SO. Effects of preceding birth intervals on neonatal, infant and under‐five years mortality and nutritional status in developing countries: evidence from the demographic and health surveys. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2005;89(S1).

Moore Z, Pfitzer A, Gubin R, Charurat E, Elliott L, Croft T. Missed opportunities for family planning: an analysis of pregnancy risk and contraceptive method use among postpartum women in 21 low- and middle-income countries. Contracept. 2015;92(1):31-9

Maternal and Child Health Integrated Program. MCHIP India. Achievements 2009-2014. USAID. Available at https://www.mchip.net/sites/default/files/MCHIP_India%20brochure.pdf

Charurat E, Ayuyo CM, Muthoni J, Kamunya R, Archer L, Koskei N, et al. An assessment of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device services in Embu, Kenya. February 2011. Available at https://www.k4health.org/sites/default/files/Kenya%20PPIUCD%20Assessment%20Report%204Feb11_Final.pdf

Ram A. Acceptability and safety of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device among parturients at Muhimbili National Hospital, Tanzania, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences. 2012.

Agarwal N, Gupta M, Sharma A, Arora R. Antenatal counselling as a tool to increase acceptability of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device insertion in a tertiary care hospital. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4(4):1137-41.

Mohamed SA, Kamel MA, Shaaban OM, Salem HT. Acceptability for the use of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices. Assuit Experience Medical Principles and Practice. 2003;12:170-5.

Thomas D, Maluccio J. Fertility, contraceptive choice, and public policy in Zimbabwe. The World Bank economic review. 1996;10(1):189-222.

Sharma A, Gupta V. A study of awareness and factors affecting acceptance of PPIUCD in South-East Rajasthan. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2017;4(8):2706-10.

Sanskriti P, Tuteja A, Mittal P, Diwan R, Suri J, Kumar A. Exploring reasons behind low acceptance for PPIUCD in postnatal women. New Indian J Surg. 2011;2(4):246.

Celen S, Möröy P, Sucak A, Aktulay A, Danisman N. Clinical outcomes of early postplacental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Contracept. 2004;69(4):279-82.

Rosales BF, Zamudio AME, Montero CMde L, Ortiz HME, Ruiz LMA. Factors for expulsion of intrauterine device Tcu380A applied immediately postpartum and after a delayed period. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2005;43(1):5-10.

Mishra S. Evaluation of safety, efficacy, and expulsion of post-placental and intra-cesarean insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices (PPIUCD). J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014;64(5):337-43.

United nations population information network. IUD insertion timing vital in postpartum use. Family Health International. 1996;16(2). Available at http://www.un.org/popin/popis/journals/network/network162/time162.html

Mishra S. Tale of the tails, the missing postpartum IUCD strings. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2017;67(3):202-7.

Barala S, Maheshwari S, Sharma P. Analysis of awareness, acceptance, safety and continuation rate of post-placental and intra-caesarean insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;5(6):1974-80.

Morrison C, Waszak C, Katz K, Diabaté F, Mate EM. Clinical outcomes of two early postpartum IUD insertion programs in Africa. Contracept. 1996;53(1):17-21.