DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20182341

Feto-maternal outcomes following caesarean section: a prospective comparative study at tertiary care centre in North-Western Rajasthan

Neha Kuntal, Madhu Patni Bhat, Amit Nimawat, Munmun Yadav, Mahendra Kumar Verma

Abstract


Background: Caesarean section (CS) is employed when vaginal delivery is not feasible or hazardous to the mother and/or her baby. The procedure, however, is not without risk. We determined the fetomaternal outcomes of CS conducted at P.B.M Tertiary hospital situated in the North-Western region of Rajasthan.

Methods: This is a Hospital based prospective comparative study of all CSs performed for various indications at the Dept. of Gynaecology and Obst., S.P. Medical College and P.B.M Hospital, Bikaner, India, from August 01, 2016, to July 31, 2017. All patients who had CS at any time within the 24 h period were noted and followed up until discharge. The sociodemographic data, types of CS, indications, and feto-maternal outcomes were documented in a proforma. Statistical analysis was carried out using the SPSS version 24.

Results: There were 16386 deliveries out of which 4456 (27.1%) were by LSCS. The age range of the group A was 21-25 years while in group B it was 26-30 years. The mean age group A was 22.4, and group B it was 27.9 years. Total 6572 primigravida patients delivered and 32.1% had LSCS. Total 9814 multigravida patients delivered and 12.6% had primary LSCS. In group A, 119(79.3%) LSCS were elective as compared to group B where only 19(12.7%) were elective and this difference was found statistically highly significant (p<0.001). Indication of LSCS is different in both the groups. Fetal distress was most common indication in group A (53.3%) while in group B most common indication was APH (35.9%). Perinatal mortality/morbidity was significantly higher in group B (7.3%) as compared to group A (2.7%).

Conclusions: The CS rate in this study was 27.1%. Although primary caesarean section in multipara constitutes only a small percentage of total deliveries and caesarean, they are associated with high maternal and perinatal morbidity. The reason for these complications is many. Beside obstetrical causes, factors like lack of antenatal care, low socioeconomic status, anaemia, malnutrition and illiteracy also play a major role obstructed labor and previous CS among Maternal and perinatal complications were more frequent with emergency CS and in the referred cases.


Keywords


Caesarean section, Fetomaternal-outcome, Parity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Nkwo OP, Onah HE. Feasibility of reducing caesarean section rate of the university of Nigeria teaching hospital, Enugu‑Nigeria. TropJ Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;19:86-9.

Basket TF, Calder AA, Arulkumaran S, editors. In: Munro Kerr’s Operative Obstetrics, Centenary ed. Edinburgh: Saunders Elsevier Ltd. (Pub); 2007: 151‑166.

Ikechebelu JI, Mbamara SU, Afuba AN. Vaginal birth after one caesarean section: A review of the practice at Nnewi, Southeast Nigeria. J Med Med Sci. 2010;1:309-13

Suresh YA, Suresh YV. A prospective comparative study of caesarean section in multiparous and primiparous women. Int J Pharma Bio Sci. 2017;8(3):890-5.

Das A. Caesarean delivery on maternal request. Saudi J Health Sci. 2013;2:141‑5.

Bhasin SK, Rajoura OP, Sharma AK, Metha M, Gupta N, Kumar S, et al. A high prevalence of caesarean section rate in East Delhi. Indian J Community Med. 2007;32:222‑4.

Okeke TC, Onah N, Ikeako LC, Ezenyeaku CC, Nwogu‑Ikojo C. Maternal and fetal outcome of elective caesarean section at 37‑38 completed weeks of gestation in Enugu, Southeast Nigeria. Am J Clin Med Res. 2013;1:32‑4.

Penna L. Management of the scarred uterus in subsequent pregnancies. Curr Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;13:173‑8.

Desai E, Leuva H, Leuva B, Kanani M. A study of primary caesarean section in multi gravida. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2013;2(3):320-4.

Rajput N, Singh P, Verma YS. Study of primary caesarean section in multigravida patients. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(1):185-91.

Saluja P, Roy K. Study of primary caesarean section in multiparous women. Natl J Integr Res Med. 2014;5(2):27-9.

Himabindu P, Tripura M. Primary Caesarean Section in Multipara. IOSR-JDMS. 2015;14(5):22-25.

Rao JH, Rampure N. Study of Primary Caesarean Section in Multiparous Women. J Evolu Med Dental Sci. 2013;2(24):4414-8.

Desai E, Leuva H, Leuva B, Kanani M. A study of primary caesarean section in multi gravida. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2013;2(3):320-4.