Comparative evaluation of laparoscopic hysterectomy and non-descent vaginal hysterectomy in women with benign gynaecological disease


  • Amita Gupta Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India
  • Sagrika Braroo Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India
  • Gagan Singh Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India
  • Aakriti Gupta Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India



Intraoperative complications, LH, NDVH, Postoperative complications


Background: Hysterectomy is one of the most frequently performed gynaecological operative procedure all over world, second most to caesarean section in United States. The aim of study was to compare the intraoperative and postoperative complications in patients undergoing non-descent vaginal hysterectomy (NDVH) and Laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) for benign gynaecological disease.

Methods: The prospective one-year study was conducted on 156 patients who required hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 75 patients assigned to Group A (NDVH) and 75 to Group B (LH) and both groups were compared.

Results: On comparing the two groups there was statistically significant decrease in the duration of surgery (p<0.01, t = 11.65), pain score (p<0.01, t = 2.75) and blood transfusion requirement (p = 0.03, χ2 = 4.80) in group A, while blood loss (p = 0.73, t = 0.33), uterine volume (p = 0.15, t = 1.43), time taken to ambulate (p = 0.06 , t = 0.21), duration of hospital stay (p = 0.07, t = 1.80), conversion to laparotomy (p = 0.13, χ2 = 2.56), febrile morbidity (p = 0.27, χ2 = 1.34), infection (p = 0.42, χ2 = 1.11) and visceral injury was found statistically insignificant.

Conclusions: Vaginal hysterectomy is an easier technique with shorter duration of surgery and with minimal infrastructure required and for fixed uterus or huge adnexal mass laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) should be preferred.


Singh A, Arora AK. Why hysterectomy rate are lower in India? Indian J Comm Med. 2008; 33(3): 196-7.

Gurin AL, Kostiahin AE, Kuchuk DO. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: advantages and disadvantages. Arch Perinatal Med. 2012;18(2):110-2.

Hudson CN, Setchell ME. Shaw’s Operative Gynaecology. 7th Edition. Elsevier India. 2013;9:145-76.

Hoffman B, Schorge J, Schaffer J, Halvorson L, Bradshaw K, Cunningham F. William’s Textbook of gynaecology. 2nd Edition. McGraw Hill; 2012;30:781-4.

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444. Choosing route of hysterectomy for benign disease. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:1156-8.

Darai E, Soriano D, Kimata P, Laplace C, Lecuru F. Vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri, with or without laparoscopic assistance: randomized study. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:712-6.

Domingo S, Pellicer A. Disclosures. Expert Rev of Obstet Gynecol. 2009;4(6):673-85.

Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;19(2):CD003677.

Kovac SR. Decision-directed hysterectomy: a possible approach to improve medical and economical outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;71(2):159-69.

Roy KK, Goyal M, Singla S, Sharma JB, Malhotra N, Kumar S. A prospective randomized study of total laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and non-descent vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of benign disease of the uterus. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284(4):907-12.

Bhandari S, Agrawal P, Singh A. Research article body mass index and its role in total laparoscopic hysterectomy. International Scholarly Research Notice. 2014:787604.

Bhadra B, Chowdhary AP, Tolassaria A, Nupur N. NDVH: personal experience in 158 cases. Al Ameen J Med Sci. 2011;4(1):23-7.

Summitt RL, Stovall TG, Lipscomb GH, Ling FW. Randomized comparison of laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy with standard vaginal hysterectomy in an out patients setting. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80:895-901.

Soriano D, Goldstein A, Lecuru F, Darai E. Recovery from vaginal hysterectomy compared with laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicentric study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:337-41.

Oksuzoglu A, Seckin B, Turkcapar FA, Ozcan S, Gungor T. Comparison of tissue trauma after abdominal, vaginal and total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Ginekol Pol. 2015;86:268-73.

Jahan S, Das TR, Mahmud N, Mondol SK, Habib SH, Saha S, et al. A comparative study among laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy: experience in a tertiary care hospital in Bangladesh. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31(3):254-7.

Makinen J, Johnson J, Tomas C, Tomas E, Heinonen PK, Laatikainen T, et al. Morbidity of 10,110 hysterectomies by type of approach. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(7):1473-8.






Original Research Articles