Use of combination method (uterine sandwich technique) to control postpartum hemorrhage
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20182876Keywords:
B-Lynch, Uterine compression sutures, Uterine sandwich techniqueAbstract
Background: Uterine atony is the most common cause (75%-90%) of primary postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) and Christopher B Lynch was the first to highlight the use of Uterine Compression Sutures (UCS) for the management of atonic PPH. In combination therapy, the (UCS) is combined with intrauterine balloon tamponade, known as (uterine sandwich), for combined external as well as internal compression for more effective hemostatic control of uterine bleeding.
Methods: The uterine sandwich technique was used in a total of twelve patients managed in a tertiary care service hospital during caesarean deliveries. In four cases of uterine atony, the sandwich technique was used, for patients unresponsive to the conservative management. In eight patients the sandwich technique was used as a prophylactic measure, where according to the clinical profile of the patient there was high risk of PPH and where either blood was not available or availability was limited.
Results: In the four cases of uterine atony, the uterine sandwich technique was used therapeutically. All the patients were multigravidae. The period of gestation ranged from 34 weeks to 37 weeks. Average operating time was 50- 60 mts, average estimated blood loss was 1600 ml, average distension of Foleys catheter was 90 ml and average duration of the intrauterine Foleys catheter balloon being in situ was 12 hrs. In eight patients, the sandwich technique was used as a prophylactic measure, for varied indications. In all the cases there was successful outcome. Post-operative outcome was uneventful in all the cases.
Conclusions: The uterine sandwich technique can be used either prophylactically or therapeutically for control of PPH. It is simple, safe, easy, effective and is easier to perform than internal iliac artery ligation and should be considered prior to proceeding for hysterectomy in a hemodynamically stable patient, in whom uterine conservation or fertility preservation is essential.
Metrics
References
Hayman RG, Arulkumaran S, Steer PJ. Uterine compression sutures: surgical management of postpartum haemorrhage. Obst Gynecol. 2002;99:502.
Ghezzi F1, Cromi A, Uccella S, Raio L, Bolis P, Surbek D. The Hayman technique: a simple method to treat postpartum haemorrhage. BJOG 2007;114(3):362.
Marasinghe JP, Condous G, Seneviratne HR, Marasinghe U. Modified anchored B-Lynch uterine compression suture for post partum bleeding with uterine atony. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011; 90(3):280-3.
Yoong W, Ridout A, Memtsa M, Stavroulis A, Aref-Adib M, Ramsay-Marcelle Z, et al. Application of uterine compression suture in association with intrauterine balloon tamponade ("uterine sandwich") for postpartum hemorrhage. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(1):147-51.
WHO. Reducing the Global Burden: Postpartum Haemorrhage. Making Pregnancy Safer; 2007.
Fotopoulou C, Dudenhausen JW. Uterine compression sutures for preserving fertility in severe postpartum haemorrhage: an overview 13 years after the first description.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;30(4):339-49.
Bakri YN. Balloon device for control of obstetrical bleeding. Eur j Obstet Gynecol reprod Biol. 1999;86:S33–S101.
Joshi VM, Shrivastava M. Partial ischemic necrosis of the uterus following a uterine brace compression suture. BJOG. 2004;111:2709.
Poujade O, Grossetti A, Mougel L, Ceccaldi PF, Ducarme G, Luton D. Risk of synechiae following uterine compression sutures in the management of major postpartum haemorrhage. BJOG. 2011;118(4):433-9.
Cho Y, Rizvi C, Uppal T, Condous G. Ultrasonographic visualization of balloon placement for uterine tamponade in massive primary postpartum hemorrhage. Ultrasound obstet Gynecol. 2008;32:711-3.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
