DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20182903

A study of congenital anomalies in a tertiary care hospital in North East region, India

Kangjam Radhesana Devi, R. K. Praneshwari Devi, Jyoti Priya, Ahanthembi Sanaton, Leimapokpam Roshan Singh, Lalhlimpuii Murray

Abstract


Background: Congenital anomalies are important cause of morbidity and mortality in newborns and are defined as structural and functional abnormalities including metabolic disorders present at birth. These defects are of prenatal origin resulting from defective embryogenesis or intrinsic abnormalities in the process of development and are associated with various risk factors.

Methods: Our study is a cross-sectional study done at Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal over period of one and half years from May 2016 to October 2017. Aim of study was to find out incidence of congenital anomalies and proportions of different types of congenital anomalies. Outcome was studied in relation to maternal age, religion, parity, gestational age, sex of baby, outcome and birth weight of baby.

Results: Total numbers of congenital anomalies were 91 out of 13658 births. Incidence of congenital anomalies was 0.66%. Most common congenital anomaly was cleft lip (17.6%) followed by CTEV (13.2%) and was more common among male term babies. These were most common in 18-24 years of maternal age group (34.1%) followed by 30-34 years (26.4%) and among women of parity P0-P2.

Conclusions: Congenital malformations are a major cause of still births and infant mortality. A level II targeted scan should be done at 18-20 weeks to find out anomalies and reduce the prevalence. There should be widespread education in the community regarding the common congenital malformations, their outcomes and possible available modes of treatment.

 


Keywords


Anomalies, Newborn, Targeted scan

Full Text:

PDF

References


Rosano A. Infant mortality and congenital anomalies from 1950 to 1994: an international perspective. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000;54:660-6.

Bhat BV, Ravikumara M. Perinatal mortality in India-Need for introspection. Indian J Matern Child Health. 1996;7:31-3.

Congenital anomalies. Available at www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets. Accessed on December 8, 2017.

Birch MR, Grayson N, Sullivan EA. AIHW Cat. NO. PER 23. Birth Anomalies Series No.1. Sydney: AIHW National Perinatal Statistics Unit; 2004.

Pabbati J, Subramanian P, Sudharshan RC, Sadhana N, Rao R. Study on incidence of congenital anomalies in a rural teaching hospital, Telangana, India. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2016;3(3):887-90.

Rani Sandhya M, Lakshmi AA. Study of congenital malformations in a tertiary hospital, government general hospital, Guntur. J Dent Med Science. 2015;14(4):16-20.

Chowdhary P, Devi RKP, Singh LS, Thakare AS, Tamang ZD, Debroy S, et al. Clinical study on congenital malformations at birth in a tertiary level hospital in North-East India. J Dent Med Sci. 2017;16(1):24-27.

Kokate P, Bang R. Study of congenital malformation in tertiary care centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016:6(1):89-93.

Suguna Bai NS, Mascarene M, Syamalan K, Nair PM. An etiological study of congenital malformation in the newborn. Indian Pediatr. 1982;19:1003-7.

Grag A, Canolly C, Hollier LM. Maternal age and malformations in singleton births. J Obstet Gynecol. 2000:96:701-6.