Evaluation of umbilical cord complication and its relation with foetal outcome

Authors

  • Aarti Jeenwal Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, M. G. M. Medical College and M. Y. Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Hemlata Jharbade Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, M. G. M. Medical College and M. Y. Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20184154

Keywords:

Cord knots, Cord prolapsed, Nuchal cord, Single umbilical artery

Abstract

Background: There are numerous umbilical cord abnormalities ranging from false knots, which have no clinical significance, to vasa previa, which could cause foetal loss. With availability of more sophisticated prenatal ultrasound techniques, many can be detected early in utero, however many of these are not apparent till delivery. In this study primary objective was to study correlation of umbilical cord complications and foetal outcome. Authors also outlined available courses of action to avert their morbidity and mortality.

Methods: Prospective case control study was conducted in Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of M.G.M. Medical College and M. Y. Hospitals, Indore. Antenatal women with more than 28 weeks gestation were included. 500 cases with cord abnormalities were followed till delivery and were compared to the 500 controls with normal cord findings. Data was recorded in predesigned coded case report forms and statistical analysis was performed.

Results: Of all the cord complications studied nuchal cord was the commonest i.e. 66.2% followed by abnormal cord length 12.4%. Incidence of cord prolapse was 7.2%. Single umbilical artery, cord knot and abnormal umbilical artery flow were found in 4%, 1.38% and 0.68% respectively.

Conclusions: The presence of nuchal cord per se is not found to be an indication of operative delivery. However, these cases require close intrapartum monitoring. Gross cord abnormality was associated with still birth, intra uterine growth restriction and intrapartum or immediate post-natal complication.

References

Umbilical-Search Online Etymology Dictionary. Available at: www.etymonline.com.

Miser WF. Outcome of infants born with nuchal cords. J Fam Pract. 1992;34(4):441-6.

Fetal Circulation. Available at: www.heart.org.

Thummala MR, Raju TN, Langenberg P. Isolated single umbilical artery anomaly and the risk for congenital malformations: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 1998;33(4):580-5.

Sheiner E, Abramowick JS, Levy A, Silberstein T, Mazor M, Hershkovitz. Nuchal cord is not associated with adverse perinatal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006;274(2):81-3.

Collins JH, Collins CL, Weckworth SR, Angelis L. Nuchal cords; timing of perinatal diagnosis and duration. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:768.

Clapp JF, Stepanchak W, Hashimoto K, Ehrenberg H, Lopez B. The natural history of antenatal nuchal cords. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:488-93.

Shrestha NS, Singh N. Nuchal cord and perinatal outcome. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2007;5(3):360-3.

Thummala MR, Raju TN, Langenberg P. Isolated single umbilical artery anomaly and the risk for congenital malformations: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 1998 Apr;33(4):580-5.

Battarbee AN, Palatnik A, Ernst LM, Grobman WA. Association of isolated single umbilical artery with small for gestational age and preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(4):760-4.

Fujikura T. Fused umbilical arteries near placental cord insertion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(3):765-7.

Anshul D, Neelu S, Suneeta G. Significance of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in the perinatal outcome of the growth restricted fetuses. J Obstetrics Gynecol India. 2010;60(1):38-43.

Airas U, Heinonen S. Clinical significance of true umbilical knots: a population-based analysis. Am J Perinatol. 2002;19(03):127-32.

Downloads

Published

2018-09-26

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles