DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20210711

A comparative study on the outcome of mattress sutures and subcuticular sutures in caesarean and hysterectomy in obese patients

Padmavathi Narahari, Anilasre Atluri

Abstract


Background: Selection of method of suturing is very important for a surgeon as it should be cosmetic, less painful, cost-effective and with less post -operative complications. Wound complications are comparatively more in obese than in non-obese patients. This has led to an increase in hospital stay and health cost for the patient. Hence selection of proper suture technique which would result in most favourable outcomes with least complications is of utmost importance. This study aimed to compare the outcome of subcuticular and mattress suture in obese patients.

Methods: This was a retrospective study on 50 obese patients who underwent primary caesarean or hysterectomy with no previous surgeries in the past. Purposive sampling method was used for selection of patients. The wound was assessed by induration, wound discharge, infection, gaping, need for resuturing. All the patients underwent standard post-operative care. Statistical analysis was done by descriptive and inferential statistics.

Results: Among the patients with subcuticular sutures, 15(60%) had wound induration with severe pain, 10 (40%) developed wound discharge, 6 (24%) had wound gaping and 6 (24%) required resuturing. Among the group with mattress sutures, 7 (28%) had wound induration, 3 (12%) developed wound discharge, 1 (4%) had wound gaping and required resuturing.

Conclusions: Not only was wound induration and pain higher among the patients with subcuticular skin sutures but these patients had a significant increase in wound gaping and resuturing also when compared to the patients who had undergone closure with mattress skin sutures.


Keywords


Caesarean, Hysterectomy, Mattress sutures, Obesity, Subcuticular sutures

Full Text:

PDF

References


Coutinho W. Latin America consensus on obesity. Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinol Metabol. 1999;43:21-67.

Pitanguy I, de Amorim NFG, Radwanski HN. Contour surgery in the patient with great weight loss. Aesth Plast Surg. 2000;24(6):406-11.

Rosen JC, Orosan P, Reiter J. Cognitive behavior therapy for negative body image in obese women. Behav Therap. 1995;26(1):25-42.

Thorpe KE, Florence CS, Howard DH, Joski P. The impact of obesity on rising medical spending. Health Affairs. 2004;(Web Exclusives):480-6.

Encinosa WE, Bernard DM, Chen CC, Steiner CA. Healthcare utilization and outcomes after bariatric surgery. Med Care. 2006;44(8):706-12.

Pitanguy I, de Amorim NFG, Radwanski HN. Contour surgery in the patient with great weight loss. Aesth Plast Surg. 2000;24(6):406-11.

Montz FJ, Creasman WT, Eddy G, DiSaia PJ. Running mass closure of abdominal wounds using absorbable looped suture. J Gynecol Surg. 1991;7:107-10.

Ramsey PS, White AM, Guinn DA, Lu GC, Ramin SM, Davies JK, et al. Subcutaneous tissue reapproximation, alone or in combination with drain, in obese women undergoing caesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:967-73.

Wang H, Hong S, Teng H, Qiao L, Yin H. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. J Matern Fet Neonat Med. 2016;4:1-32.

Shwetha BR, Nair RV, Pillai JT, Prashant VS. Comparison between interrupted vertical mattress versus subcuticular suture for skin closure in caesarean section at SMIMS. IJRR. 2016;3:33-6.