DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20183812

Successful term pregnancy after uterine artery embolization for caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a case report

Angeline Job, Spandana S.

Abstract


The incidence of caesarean scar pregnancy range from 1 in 1800 to 1 in 2500 of all pregnancies. It has been estimated that 6.1% of pregnancies in women with at least one previous Caesarean section and a diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy will be Caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). There is no consensus on the management of CSP. An invasive intervention such as excision of scar ectopic can reduce recurrence but affects patient’s fertility. Conservative management like administration of methotrexate and uterine artery embolization (UAE) is specially important for young women who want to keep their fertility. This is a case report of a 29-year-old woman who presented with persistent heavy bleeding following failed MTP at 12 weeks of gestation. Ultrasonogarphy was suggestive of Caesarean scar pregnancy and MRI of chronic left adnexal ectopic. Laparotomy also was suggestive of Caesarean scar ectopic. She was managed conservatively with UAE followed by Methotrexate. The procedure was performed successfully, and the patient’s fertility was preserved. Follow up consisted of serial bhCG monitoring which gradually returned to normal levels. She conceived four years after UAE and had an uneventful antenatal period and underwent Elective Cesaraen section at 38 weeks. For those patients with CSP who desire future pregnancy, the comprehensive treatment including UAE can be considered in management.


Keywords


Cesarean scar pregnancy, Magnetic resonance imaging, Methotrexate, Ultrasound, Uterine artery embolization

Full Text:

PDF

References


Larsen JV, Solomon MH. Pregnancy in a uterine scar sacculus: an unusual cause of postabortal haemorrhage. S Afr Med J. 1978;53:142-3.

Patel MA. Scar ectopic pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2015;65(6):372-5.

Elson CJ, Salim R, Potdar N, Chetty M, Ross JA, Kirk EJ. Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. BJOG. 2016;123:15-55.

Maymon R, Halperin R, Mendlovic S, Schneider D, Vaknin Z, Herman A, et al. Ectopic pregnancies in Caesarean section scars: the 8 year experience of one medical centre. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:278-84.

Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:1373-81.

Sugawara J, Senoo M, Chisaka H, Yaegashi N, Okamura K. Successful conservative treatment of a cesarean scar pregnancy with uterine artery embolization. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2005;206:261-5.

Ash A, Smith A, Maxwell D. Caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG. 2007;114:253-63.

Shufaro Y, Nadjari M. Implantation of a gestational sac in a cesarean section scar. Fertil Steril. 2001;75:1217.

Chua GC, Wilsher M, Young MP, Manyonda I, Morgan R, Belli AM. Comparison of particle penetration with nonspherical polyvinyl alcohol versus trisacryl gelatin microspheres in women undergoing premyomectomy uterine artery embolization. Clin Radiol. 2005;60:116-22.

Chou MM, Hwang JI, Tseng JJ, Huang YF, Ho ES. Cesarean scar pregnancy: quantitative assessment of uterineneovascularization with 3-dimensional color power Doppler imaging and successful treatment with uterine artery embolization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:866-8.

Singh SS, Bordman R, Leyland N. Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization for fibroids. Canadian Fam Physic. 2007 Feb;53(2):293-5.