Prevalence and risk factors for bacterial vaginosis in sexually active females in age group 20-45 years and comparison of Amsel's criteria with Nugent's score

Sharadini Ghattargi; Sheela N.; Mary Dias

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20183431

Authors

Sharadini Ghattargi Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vani-Vilas Hospital, BMC and RI, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Sheela N. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. John’s National Academy of Health Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Mary Dias Department of Microbiology, St. John’s National Academy of Health Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20183431

Keywords:

Amsel’s criteria, Bacterial vaginosis, Nugent score, Prevalence, Risk factors

Abstract

Background: In recent years Bacterial vaginosis has emerged as a global issue of concern due to its association with cervicitis, salphingitis, endometritis, postoperative infections, Urinary tract infections, pelvic inflammatory infections, spontaneous abortions, preterm delivery, abnormal Pap smears and increased susceptibility to HIV. Bacterial vaginosis is one of the most common lower genital tract infections among women of childbearing age and yet its diagnosis can be problematic. Gardnerella has been reported in upto 50% of women with no signs or symptoms of Bacterial vaginosis. So, it is important to know the prevalence and risk factors of Bacterial vaginosis, so that requirement of screening, early diagnosis and management can be planned.

Methods: After obtaining ethical committee approval, hundred consenting patients between 20-45 yrs of women, diagnosis by Amsel’s criteria was done in gynaecology outpatient department and diagnosis by Nugent criteria was done in microbiology laboratory.

Results: In present study authors had a prevalence of 37% and among them 48.65% were asymptomatic. Bacterial vaginosis was statistically significantly associated with multipara and the trend was more towards low socio-economic group and lower education. In our study we considered Nugent’s criteria as gold standard and found that Amsel’s criteria had positive predictive value = 88.88%, negative predictive value = 79.67%, sensitivity = 71.11% and specificity = 92.73%.

Conclusions: Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis was 37%, which is a significant proportion and therefore screening for bacterial vaginosis may be useful to detect and treat the cases, larger trials are required before any recommendation can be made.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Mc Gregor JA, French JI. Bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy. Obstetric Gynaecologic Survey. 2000;56(5):50-1.

Kaur KH, Puri KJPS, Anita M, Kiran B. Prevalence of Bacterial Vaginosis in sexually active females. J Obstet Gynecol Ind. 2003;53(2):178-80.

Sharon LH. Diagnostic microbiology of Bacterial Vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:455-9.

Nelson DB, Macones G. Bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy. Current findings and future directions. Epidemol Rev. 2002;24:102-8.

Bradshaw CS, Morton AN, Garland SM, Morris MB, Moss LM, Fairley CK. Higher-Risk behavioural practices associated with Bacterial vaginosis compared with vaginal candidiasis. Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;106(1):105-14.

Donders G. Diagnosis and management of bacterial vaginosis and other types of abnormal vaginal bacterial flora: A review. Obstetric Gynaecol Surv. 2010;65(7):462-73.

Koumans EH, Sternberg M, Bruce C, McQuillan G, Kendrick J, Sutton M et al. The prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in the United States, 2001-2004; associations with symptoms, sexual behaviors, and reproductive health. Sex Transm Dis. 2007 Nov;34(11):864-9.

Klebanoff MA, Schwebke JR, Zhang J, Nansel TR, Yu KF, Andrews WW. Vulvovaginal symptoms in women with bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Aug;104(2):267-72.

Chaijareenont K, Sirimai K, Boriboonhirunsarn D, Kiriwat O. Accuracy of Nugent's score and each Amsel's criteria in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. J Med Assoc Thai. 2004 Nov 1;87(11):1270-4.

Smart S, Singal A, Mindel A. Social and sexual risk factors for bacterial vaginosis. Sex Transm Infect. 2004;80:58-62 .

Nawani M, Sujatha R, Halasuru NS. Diagnosis and prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in a teritiary care centre at Kanpur. J Evol Med Dental Sci. 2013 Jun 3;2(22):3959-63.

Eschenbach DA, Hillier S, Critchlow C, Stevens C, DeRouen T, Holmes KK. Diagnosis and clinical manifestations of bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;158:819-28.

Bitew A, Abebaw Y, Bekele D, Mihret A. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and associated risk factors among women complaining of genital tract infection. Int J Microbiol. 2017;2017.

Mohammadzadeh F, Dolatian M, Jorjani M, Majd HA. Diagnostic value of Amsel’s clinical criteria for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. Glob J Health Sci. 2015 May;7(3):8-14.