Histomorphometry of umbilical vessels of intrauterine growth restricted neonates

Authors

  • Sangeeta S. Kotrannavar Department of Anatomy, J N Medical College, KLE University, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
  • Veereshkumar S. Shirol Department of Anatomy, J N Medical College, KLE University, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
  • Hema A. Dhumale Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, J N Medical College, KLE University, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
  • Rajendra S. Humbarwadi Department of Anatomy, USM- KLE International Medical Programme, Belagavi, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20151612

Keywords:

Cross sectional areas, Histomorphometry, IUGR, Umbilical vessels, Umbilical vein

Abstract

Background: A complex and coordinated interaction between maternal, placental and fetal factors influences the normal fetal growth. Any disruption in this complex system can lead to intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR).The main objective of the study is to evaluate histomorphometric differences in umbilical vessels of appropriate for gestational age (AGA) and intrauterine growth restricted (IUGR) neonates and to observe histomorphometric differences existing in umbilical vessels between male and female sex.

Methods: A prospective observational study included 110 umbilical cords (UC) procured from KLES Dr. Prabhakar Kore Charitable Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Belagavi, India. Formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tissues were processed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and Masson’s trichrome stain. Histomorphometric measurements of cross sectional areas (CSA) of umbilical vessels like total vessel area (mm2), lumen area (mm2) and vessel wall area (mm2) were taken with 40X magnification with the help of Olympus microscope having digital image analyzer attachment. The relevant personal data of mother and neonate were recorded. Independent t test was used to compare means and chi-square test for categorical variables.

Results: Umbilical vessels of IUGR neonates had significantly reduced total vessel area, vessel wall area and lumen area compared to AGA neonates (except lumen area of umbilical arteries). Ratios of total vessel area to lumen area and vessel wall area to lumen area were significantly increased in human umbilical vein (HUV) of IUGR neonates. No significant difference in CSAs of umbilical vessels was observed between male and female sex in both groups.

Conclusions: IUGR is associated with significant structural changes in umbilical vessels of full term neonates. These changes are more obvious in HUV than human umbilical artery (HUA). It can be detected prenatally and used as an indicator of impending IUGR.

References

Sankaran S, Kyle PM. Aetiology and pathogenesis of IUGR. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstet & Gynaecol. 2009;23(6):765-77.

Koech A, Ndungu B, Gichangi P. Structural changes in umbilical vessels in pregnancy induced hypertension. Placenta. 2008;29(2):210-4.

Baergen RN. Umbilical cord pathology. Surgical Pathol Clin. 2013;6(1):61-85.

Tantbirojn P, Saleemuddin A, Sirois K, Crum C, Boyd T, Tworoger S et al. Gross abnormalities of the umbilical cord: related placental histology and clinical significance. Placenta. 2009;30(12):1083-8.

Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, Duwe DG, Cromi A, Schneider H. Umbilical Cord Morphologic Characteristics and Umbilical Artery Doppler Parameters in Intrauterine Growth–Restricted Fetuses. J of Ultrasound in Med. 2003;22(12):1341-7.

Bruch JF, Sibony O, Benali K, Challier JC, Blot P, Nessmann C. Computerized microscope morphometry of umbilical vessels from pregnancies with intrauterine growth retardation and abnormal umbilical artery Doppler. Hum Pathol. 1997;28(10):1139-45.

Martyn C, Barker D, Jespersen S, Greenwald S, Osmond C, Berry C. Growth in utero, adult blood pressure, and arterial compliance. British heart J. 1995;73(2):116-21.

Barker DJ. In utero programming of chronic disease.Clinical science. 1998;95(2):115-28.

Mandruzzato G, Antsaklis A, Botet F, Chervenak FA, Figueras F, Grunebaum A, et al. Intrauterine restriction (IUGR). Journal of perinatal medicine. 2008;36(4):277-81.

Burkhardt T, Matter C, Lohmann C, Cai H, Lüscher T, Zisch A, et al. Decreased umbilical artery compliance and IGF-I plasma levels in infants with intrauterine growth restriction–implications for fetal programming of hypertension. Placenta. 2009;30(2):136-41.

Kinare A. Fetal environment. The Indian J of Radiology & Imaging. 2008;18(4):32-44.

Schoenwolf GC, Bleyl SB, Brauer PR, Francis-West PH. Larsen's Human Embryology. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Elsevier Churchill Livingstone. 2009; 64-7.

Shore V, Wang T-H, Wang C-L, Torry R, Caudle M, Torry D. Vascular endothelial growth factor, placenta growth factor and their receptors in isolated human trophoblast. Placenta. 1997;18(8):657-65.

Ahmed A, Dunk C, Ahmad S, Khaliq A. Regulation of placental vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and placenta growth factor (PlGF) and soluble Flt-1 by oxygen - a review. Placenta. 2000;21:S16-S24.

Abuzzahab MJ, Schneider A, Goddard A, Grigorescu F, Lautier C, Keller E, et al. IGF-I receptor mutations resulting in intrauterine and postnatal growth retardation. New England J of Med. 2003;349(23):2211-22.

Boito S, Struijk P, Ursem N, Stijnen T, Wladimiroff J. Umbilical venous volume flow in the normally developing and growth‐restricted human fetus. Ultrasound in Obstet & Gynecol. 2002;19(4):344-9.

Peyter AC, Delhaes F, Baud D, Vial Y, Diaceri G, Menétrey S et al. Intrauterine growth restriction is associated with structural alterations in human umbilical cord and decreased nitric oxide-induced relaxation of umbilical vein. Placenta. 2014;35(11):891-9.

Khaliq A, Dunk C, Jiang J, Shams M, Li XF, Acevedo C et al. Hypoxia down-regulates placenta growth factor, whereas fetal growth restriction up-regulates placenta growth factor expression: molecular evidence for" placental hyperoxia" in intrauterine growth restriction. Lab Invest. 1999;79:151-70.

Li W-C, Zhang H-M, Wang P-J, Xi G-M, Wang H-Q, Chen Y et al. Quantitative analysis of the microstructure of human umbilical vein for assessing feasibility as vessel substitute. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2008;22(3):417-24.

Macara L, Kingdom J, Kaufmann P, Kohnen G, Hair J, More I, et al. Structural analysis of placental terminal villi from growth-restricted pregnancies with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler waveforms. Placenta. 1996;17(1):37-48.

Asmussen I, Kjeldsen K. Intimal ultrastructure of human umbilical arteries. Observations on arteries from newborn children of smoking and nonsmoking mothers. Circulation Research. 1975;36(5):579-89.

Li WC, Ruan XZ, Zhang HM, Zeng YJ. Biomechanical properties of different segments of human umbilical cord vein and its value for clinical application. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2006;76(1):93-7.

Sepulveda W. Time for a more detailed prenatal examination of the umbilical cord? Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology. 1999;13(3):157-60.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-16

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles