Evaluation of Reid’s Combined Colposcopic Index as a predictor of cervical intraepithelial lesion


  • Indu Verma Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India
  • Pratibha Pundhir Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India
  • Tejinder Kaur Department of Oncology and Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MDOH, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
  • Veena Jain Department of Oncology and Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MDOH, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
  • Dinesh Sood Department of Anaesthesiology, DMC and H, Ludhiana, Punjab, India




Carcinoma cervix, Cervical intraepithelial lesion (CIN), Reid’s Combined Colposcopic Index (RCI)


Background: Carcinoma cervix is the commonest cancer among women worldwide and in India it accounts for 80% of all genital cancers. Screening methods include cervical cytology, human papilloma virus testing and colposcopy. Objective of present study was to evaluate suspicious cervix colposcopically using Reids Colposcopic Index (RCI) and to correlate RCI with histopathological findings.

Methods: This was a prospective cross sectional study done on 125 women with clinical diagnosis of suspicious cervix. Colposcopy was performed and grading of the disease was done according to RCI. Positive cases were subjected to cervical biopsy and endocervical curettage was performed in unsatisfactory colposcopy.

Results: Colposcopy was done on 125 women with suspicious cervix. Out of 125, sixty two showed abnormal colposcopic findings which were graded according to RCI into Low grade disease predicting histological diagnosis of CIN1 in 47, Intermediate grade disease predicting histological diagnosis of CIN1/2 in 11 and High grade disease predicting histological diagnosis of CIN2/3 in 4 women. Colposcopy of one women suggested invasive carcinoma and was confirmed on histopathology to be microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma. Six women with unsatisfactory colposcopy showed benign histopathology. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and false negative rate of colposcopy for invasive disease was 50%, 100%, 100% and 1.60% respectively with 98.40% diagnostic accuracy. Colposcopic diagnosis of invasive disease and histopathology report showed 100% correlation.

Conclusions: Correlation between RCI and histopathology was good. Predictive accuracy of colposcopy increased with increasing severity of disease.


Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69-90.

Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Perkin DM. GLOBOCAN 2008, Cancer Incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC cancer base No. 10 [internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2010. Available at http//globocan.aarc.fr.

Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. The Challenge Ahead: Progress in Breast and Cervical Cancer. Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation. 2011. Available at http://www.healthmetricsandevaluation.org/publications/policyreport/challenge-ahead-progress-and-setbacksbreastand-cervical-cancer.

Miller AB. Cervical cancer screening programmes, managerial guidelines. WHO Geneva. 1992;6-14:44-8.

Dexeus S, Cararach M, Dexeus D. Role of colposcopy in modern gynaecology. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2002;23(4):269-77.

Reid R, Stanhope CR, Herschman BR, Crum CP, Agronow SJ. Genital warts and cervical cancer. IV.A colposcopic index for differentiating subclinical papillomaviral infection from cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;149(8):815-23.

Olstad P, Stafl A. Atlas of colposcopy. Oslo:Universities Forlaget;1972.

Burke L, Antonioli DA, Ducatman BS. Colposcopy text and atlas Norwalk; Appleton & Lange;1991:7-27.

Walker P, De Palo G, Campion M, Barrasso R, Campion M, Girardi F, Jakob C, et al. International terminology of colposcopy: An update report from the International Fedration for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101(1):175-7.

Mitchell DG. Reid,s Colposcopic Index in Colposcopic Assessment System. In: Barbara SA, Gregory L ed. Colposcopy principles and practice. An integrated text book and atlas. WB Saunders Co;2002:213-24.

Arora R, Vijaya K, Habeebullah S, Asha O. Colposcopic evaluation of unhealthy cervix. J Obstet Gynecol Ind. 2000;50:102-3.

Navya BN, Rashmi B, Ravikanth Go, Sathyavathi R Alva. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of colposcopic findings using modified reid colposcopic index with histopathology in cervical lesions. JDMS. 2016;15:129-33.

Dexeus S Jr, Carrera JM, Coupez F. Colposcopy. W B Saunders Company, Philadelphia;1977;10:131-57.

Handa PR, Dhall GI. Colposcopy as diagnostic aid in cases of suspicious cervix. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;41(6):785-92.

Massad LS, Collins YC. Strength of correlations between colposcopic impression and biopsy histology. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;89:424-8.

Daron FG, Litaker MS. Prediction of cervical histologic results using an abbreviated Reid Colposcopic Index during ALTS. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;194(3):704-10.

Stafl A, Mattingly R. Angiogenesis of cervical neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975;121(6):845-52

Edbiri AA. The relative significance of colposcopic descriptive appearences in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1990;33(1):23-9.






Original Research Articles