DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20183788

High rate of caesarean section in cases of intrauterine fetal demise in a low resource setting: Why?

Shivani Kothiyal, Anjoo Agarwal, Vinita Das, Amita Pandey, Smriti Agarwal

Abstract


Background: Stillbirth as an obstetric complication is emotionally devastating for the women as well as the clinician and having a caesarean section for stillbirth is even more catastrophic. The aim of the present research was to study the indications of caesarean section in women with intrauterine fetal demise in a low resource setting.

Methods: This was an observational study for assessing the indication of caesarean section among 222/ 550 stillbirths from June 2013 to May 2014 in a tertiary care teaching hospital of North India. 7024 births occurred in the institution over a period of 1 year out of which 550 were stillbirths. Stillbirths which weighed over 500 grams were included in the study. Details of women with intrauterine fetal demise in which caesarian section was done were noted and analyzed.

Results: Out of 550 stillbirths, 222 women underwent caesarean section. Rate of caesarean section among women with stillbirth was 40.36%.  Placenta previa (23.87%), Rupture uterus (22.1%), obstructed labour (10.8%), transverse lie (9.45%), failed induction (7.20%), massive abruption (5.86%), non-progress of labour (5.40%), eclampsia/pre-eclampsia related causes (4.95%), acute fetal distress (4.95%), were leading indications of caesarean sections. Out of 222 women, 162 (73%) women had anaemia (Hb <11g%). Severe anaemia (haemoglobin less then 7gm/dl) was present in 51 cases (23%).

Conclusions: Caesarean section done for intrauterine death in present study were mostly inevitable. Reducing intrapartum stillbirths by improving essential obstetric services will ultimately result in reducing caesarean section rates in stillbirths in developing countries. Further studies are needed both in developing and developed countries to strategize the management of intrauterine dead fetus to prevent such high rate of caesarean section.


Keywords


Caesarean section, Intrauterine fetal demise, Stillbirths

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brazil. Ministry of Health. Secretary of Health? policies. Department of Strategic Policy Management. Technical area of women's health. High risk gestation - technical Manual. 3rd edition.

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 102: management of stillbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(3):748-61.

Queensland Maternity and Neonatal Clinical Guideline: Stillbirth care. Guideline No MN11.24-V4-R16May 2011. Available at http://www. health.qld.gov.au/qcg/documents/g_still5-0.pdf [link expired; now at https://www.health.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0023/143087/g-stillbirth.pdf]

Siassakos D, Fox R, Draycott T, Winter RM. - Management of late intrauterine fetal death and stillbirth. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 2010; :55–13..

Silver RM, Heuser CC. Stillbirth workup and delivery management. Clin Obstetr Gynecol. 2010 Sep 1;53(3):681-90.

World Health Organisation. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2(8452):436-7.

Manjulatha B, Sravanthi TP. Caesarean section rates in a Teaching Hospital: a ten-year review. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2015;14(8):1-5.

Gupta M, Garg V. The rate and indications of caesarean section in a teaching hospital at Jaipur, India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 6:1786-92

Sarma P, Boro RC, Acharjee PS. An analysis of indications of caesarean sections at Tezpur medical college and hospital, Tezpur (a government hospital). Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 5:1364-7.

Bhasin SK, Rajoura OP, Sharma AK, Metha M, Gupta N, Kumar S et al. A high prevalence of caesarean section rate in East Delhi. Indian J Comm Med. 2007;32(3):222-4.

Das V, Kumar N, Kumari V, Agarwal A, Pandey A, Agrawal S. Increasing rates of cesarean section, an upcoming public health problem: an audit of cesarean section in a tertiary care center of North India based on Robson classification. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 6(11):4998-5002.

O'leary CM, Bower C, Knuiman M, Stanley FJ. Changing risks of stillbirth and neonatal mortality associated with maternal age in Western Australia 1984–2003. Paediatr Perinatal Epidemiol. 2007 Nov;21(6):541-9.

Reddy UM, Ko CW, Willinger M. Maternal age and the risk of stillbirth throughout pregnancy in the United States. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2006 Sep 1;195(3):764-70.

Gordon A, Raynes-Greenow C, McGeechan K, Morris J, Jeffery H. Risk factors for antepartum stillbirth and the influence of maternal age in New South Wales Australia: a population based study. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2013 Dec;13(1):12.

Flenady V, Middleton P, Smith GC, Duke W, Erwich JJ, Khong TY, et al. Stillbirths: the way forward in high-income countries. Lancet. 2011 May 14;377(9778):1703-17.

Association between stillbirth and risk factors known at pregnancy confirmation. JAMA 2011;306(22):2469-2479.

Dulitzki M, Soriano D, Schiff E, Chetrit A, Mashiach S, Seidman DS. Effect of very advanced maternal age on pregnancy outcome and rate of cesarean delivery. Obstetr Gynecol. 1998 Dec 1;92(6):935-9.

Huang L, Sauve R, Birkett N, Fergusson D, van Walraven C. Maternal age and risk of stillbirth: a systematic review. Canad Medi Asso J. 2008 Jan 15;178(2):165-72.

Bianco A, Stone J, Lynch L, Lapinski R, Berkowitz G, Berkowitz RL. Pregnancy outcome at age 40 and older. Obstetr Gynecol. 1996 Jun 1;87(6):917-22.

Yaniv SS, Levy A, Wiznitzer A, Holcberg G, Mazor M, Sheiner E. A significant linear association exists between advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Apr 1;283(4):755-9.

Delbaere I, Verstraelen H, Goetgeluk S, Martens G, De Backer G, Temmerman M. Pregnancy outcome in primiparae of advanced maternal age. Eur J Obstetr Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Nov 1;135(1):41-6.

Willinger M, Ko CW, Reddy UM. Racial disparities in stillbirth risk across gestation in the United States. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 2009 Nov;201(5):469-e1.

Akpala CO. Perinatal mortality in a northern Nigerian rural community. J Royal Soc Health. 1993 Jun;113(3):124-7.

Aisien AO, Lawson JO, Okolo A. Two years prospective study of perinatal mortality in Jos, Nigeria. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;71:171-3.

Wu Z, Viisainen K, Wang Y, Hemminki E. Perinatal mortality in rural China: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2003 Dec 4;327(7427):1319.

Abebe FE, Gebeyehu AW, Kidane AN, Eyassu GA. Factors leading to cesarean section delivery at Felegehiwot referral hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: a retrospective record review. Reprod Health. 2015 Dec;13(1):6.

Al-Mulhim A. Factors affecting the rate and the indications of primary caesarean section. Bahrain Med Bul. 2001;23(4):160-2.

Mukherj J, Kamilya G, Bhattacharyya SK. Caesarean section for the dead baby -an unhappy reality. J Indian Med Asso. 2007 Jun;105(6):316-8.

Eden RD, Parker RT, Gall SA. Rupture of the pregnant uterus: a 53-year review. Obstetr Gynecol. 1986 Nov;68(5):671-4.

Yap OW1, Kim ES, Laros RK Jr. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after uterine rupture in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jun;184(7):1576-81.

Arora M, Jindal S, Gupta S. Retrospective study of cases of rupture uterus. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6:1900-4.

Aggarwal N, Singla R, Dhaliwal L, Suri V. Audit of emergency obstetric referrals-a pilot study from tertiary care centre of North India. Bangladesh J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2016;30(1):25-9.

Gupta U, Chitra R. Destructive operations still have a place in developing countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1994 Jan;44(1):15-9.

Hemminki E. Long term maternal health effects of caesarean section. J Epidemiol Comm Health. 1991 Mar 1;45(1):24-8.

Hemminki E. Impact of Caesarean section on future pregnancy‐a review of cohort studies. Paediat Perinatal Epidemiol. 1996 Oct;10(4):366-79.

Hemminki E, Meriläinenb J. Long-term effects of cesarean sections: ectopic pregnancies and placental problems. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 1996 May 1;174(5):1569-74.

Armstrong CA, Harding S, Matthews T, Dickinson JE. Is placenta accreta catching up with us?. Aus NZ J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2004 Jun;44(3):210-3.

Sentilhes L, Kayem G, Ambroselli C, Provansal M, Fernandez H, Perrotin F, et al. Fertility and pregnancy outcomes following conservative treatment for placenta accreta. Hum Reprod. 2010 Sep 10;25(11):2803-10.

O’Brien D, Babiker E, O'Sullivan O, Conroy R, McAuliffe F, Geary M, et al. Prediction of peripartum hysterectomy and end organ dysfunction in major obstetric haemorrhage. Eur J Obstetr Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Dec 1;153(2):165-9.

Souza JP, Cecatti JG, Faundes A, Morais SS, Villar J, Carroli G, et al. Maternal near miss and maternal death in the World Health Organization's 2005 global survey on maternal and perinatal health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2010;88:113-9.

Zwart JJ, Richters JM, Öry F, De Vries JI, Bloemenkamp KW, Van Roosmalen J. Severe maternal morbidity during pregnancy, delivery and puerperium in the Netherlands: a nationwide population‐based study of 371000 pregnancies. BJOG: Int J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2008 Jun 1;115(7):842-50.

Justus Hofmeyr G, Say L, Metin Gülmezoglu A. Systematic review: WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: the prevalence of uterine rupture. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Sep;112(9):1221-8.

Heinonen S, Kirkinen P. Pregnancy outcome after previous stillbirth resulting from causes other than maternal conditions and fetal abnormalities. Birth. 2000 Mar 1;27(1):33-7.

Robson S, Chan A, Keane RJ, Luke CG. Subsequent birth outcomes after an unexplained stillbirth: preliminary population‐based retrospective cohort study. Aus NZ J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2001 Feb 1;41(1):29-35.

Lurie S, Eldar I, Glezerman M, Sadan O. Pregnancy outcome after stillbirth. J Reprod Med. 2007 Apr;52(4):289-92.

Black M, Shetty A, Bhattacharya S. Obstetric outcomes subsequent to intrauterine death in the first pregnancy. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Jan 1;115(2):269-74.