DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20184144

Non-acceptance of permanent methods of contraception-a threat to small family norm: a cross-sectional study from the Northern state of India

Rajesh Kumar Singh, Amandeep Kaur

Abstract


Background: India is second most populous country of the world after China and is expected to surpass China by 2024. In order to balance the population growth, replacement-level fertility – total fertility rate of 2.1 – needs to be achieved and sustained even at sub-national level. Acceptance of permanent family planning methods by young couples can be an effective way of eliminating risk of future pregnancies. The objective of the present study was to assess acceptance and determinants of acceptance of permanent methods of contraception among couples with two or more living children.

Methods: A community based cross-sectional study was conducted during September 2017-April 2018 in Haldwani block of Nainital District of Uttarakhand, India. The study participants were selected by multi-stage sampling and were interviewed using semi-structured and pretested questionnaire. The statistical analysis was done using the software R. Chi-square test was used to test association between variables.

Results: Among 221 interviewed study subjects, only 34.39% were using permanent method of contraception and out of these, 96.05% were acceptors of tubectomy while only 3.95% preferred vasectomy. One in four couples were not using any contraceptive method and rest chose temporary contraceptive techniques. Non-acceptors were especially high in case of couples with women belonging to lower age-group, living in joint families, having only one or no male child and with formal schooling.

Conclusions: Non-acceptance of permanent method of contraception for limiting the family after two children was very high in the community and desire for male child being its important determinant.


Keywords


Determinants, Family Planning, Fertility Rate, Tubectomy, Vasectomy

Full Text:

PDF

References


CensusInfo India 2011 Final Population Totals - India - Population size [Internet]. [cited 2018 May 7]. Available from: http://www.devinfo.org/indiacensuspopulationtotals2011/libraries/aspx/Home.

United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables [Internet]. 2017 p. 5. Report No.: Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP/248. Available from: https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/publications/Files/WPP2017_KeyFindings.pdf

India and Family Planning: An overview [Internet]. [cited 2018 May 7]. Available from: http://www.searo.who.int/entity/maternal_reproductive_health/documents/india-fp.pdf?ua=1

Annual Report of Department of Health and Family Welfare 2016-17 | Ministry of Health and Family Welfare | GOI [Internet]. [cited 2018 May 7]. Available from: https://mohfw.gov.in/annual-report-department-health-and-family-welfare--2016-17

World Health Organization, Total Fertility Rate [Internet]. SEARO. Available from: http://www.searo.who.int/health_situation_trends/data/chi/TFR/en/

Mason KO, Hartmann B. Reproductive Rights and Wrongs: The Global Politics of Population Control. Popul Dev Rev. 1995;21(4):885.

Total Fertility Rate (TFR) (Birth/ woman) | NITI Aayog, (National Institution for Transforming India), Government of India [Internet]. [cited 2018 Jun 1]. Available from: http://niti.gov.in/content/total-fertility-rate-tfr-birth-woman#

National Health Policy 2017: Ministry of Health & Family Welfare [Internet]. Available from: http://164.100.158.44/index1.php?lang=1&level=1&sublinkid=6471&lid=4270

Family Welfare. Human and Social Development. 9th Five Year Plan (Vol-2). [Internet]. [cited 2018 May 17]. Available from: http://planningcommission.nic.in/plans/planrel/fiveyr/9th/vol2/v2c3-5.htm

Reference Manual for Female Sterilization. [Internet]. Family Planning Division. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. Government of India; 2014. Available from: https://www.ukhfws.org/uploads/documents/doc_3768_ref-manual-for-female-sterilization.pdf

India Factsheet. National family health survey (NFHS-4) 2015–16 [Internet]. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS); 2017. [cited 2018 May 7]. Available from: http://rchiips.org/NFHS/pdf/NFHS4/India.pdf

State Factsheet Uttarakhand. National family health survey (NFHS-4) 2015–16 [Internet]. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS); 2017. [cited 2018 May 7]. Available from: http://rchiips.org/NFHS/pdf/NFHS4/UT_FactSheet.pdf

R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [Internet]. [cited 2018 May 17]. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/

Banerjee B. Socioeconomic and cultural determinants on acceptance of permanent methods of contraception. J Fam Welf. 2004;50(1):7.

Gadre S, Gadre A. Preferences of eligible women from an Indian medical college hospital for adapting contraceptives. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5(1):35-40.

Mota K, Reddy S, Getachew B. Unmet need of long-acting and permanent family planning methods among women in the reproductive age group in Shashemene town, Oromia region, Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15(1):51.

Girdhar S, Chaudhary A, Gill PJS, Soni RK, Sachar RK. Contraceptive Practices And Related Factors Among Married Women In A Rural Area Of Ludhiana. Internet J Health [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2018 May 8];12(1). Available from: http://ispub.com/IJH/12/1/5428#

Bharadwaj MK, Patrikar S, Singh S. Determinant factors affecting the trends of permanent sterilization: a decadal analysis in a tertiary care institute. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(12):5348-53.

Kumar A, Bhardwaj P, Srivastava JP, Gupta P. A study on family planning practices and methods among women of urban slums of Lucknow city. Indian J Community Health. 2011;23(2):75-7.

Pathak V, Chandra M, Bisani VR. Challenges in utilisation of small family norm. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(1):276-9.