DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20183760

Prospective study of large uterine fibroids encountered during laparotomy and hysterectomy and their management

Y. Lakshmi Nalini, A. Sarath Chandra, M. Akshitha

Abstract


Background: Study of large fibroids is necessary to throw light on complications associated with them. This helps the surgeon to safeguard patients from anticipated complications during surgery. The objective is to study the clinical features, complications and outcome of large uterine fibroids.

Methods: A hospital based prospective study was carried out among 32 eligible patients undergoing laparotomy hysterectomy at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology from October 2015 to June 2018. Age groups, clinical features, complications and outcome of surgery were recorded. Data was analyzed using proportions.

Results: Majority of the study subjects were in the age group of 25-35 years. The most common presenting symptom of large size fibroid uterus was abnormal uterine bleeding followed by pain abdomen in 18.8% of the cases. Majority of the women had fibroid size of 16-20 weeks in 62.5% of the cases followed by size of the 20-26 weeks in 31.3% of the cases. Only two women had very large size of 26-28 weeks in 6.3% of the cases. Only three patients had intra operative complications (9.4%). Among them two (6.3%) had injury to the urinary bladder and only one had injury to the ureters. 90.6% of the cases had no intra operative complications. All cases had complete symptomatic relief. Thus the successful outcome was seen in 100% of the cases.

Conclusions: Large uterine fibroids can end up with urological complications more than smaller fibroids. Among these bladder and ureteric complications are important. Malignant degeneration is rare. Other complications include infection and wound dehiscence.


Keywords


Hysterectomy, Laparotomy, Management, Uterine fibroids

Full Text:

PDF

References


Steiner FC. Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990-1997. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:299-34.

Aronson MP, Bose TM. Urinary tract injury in pelvic surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2002;45:428-38.

Thompson JD. Operative injuries to the ureter; prevention, recognition and management. In: Rock JA, Thompson JD, eds. TeLinde’s Operative Gynecology, 8th ed. Philadelphia; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1997:1135-1174.

Hills S, Marchbanks P, Peterson H. Uterine size and risk of complications among women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy for leiomyomas. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87:539-43.

Iverson R, Chelmow D, Strohbehn K, Waldman L, Evantash E. Relative morbidity of abdominal hysterectomy and myomectomy for management of uterine leiomyomas. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:415-9.

Sawin S, Pilvesky N, BNerlin J, Barnbart K. Comparability of peri-operative morbidity between abdominal myomectomy and hysterectomy for women with uterine leiomyomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;1448-55.

Parket W, Fu Y, Berek J. Uterine sarcoma in patients operated on for presumed leiomyomas and rapidly growing leiomyomas. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83:414-8.

Ostrezenski A, Radolinskin B, Ostezenska KM. A review of laparoscopic Ureteral injury in pelvic surgery. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2003;58(12):794-9.

Likic-Ladevic I, Kadija S, Ladevic N, Stefanovic A, Argirovic R, Petkovic S, et al. Urological complications after radical hysterectomy: incidence rates and predisposing factors. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2007;64(6):381-4.

Borboroglu PG, Amling CL, Schenkman NS, Monga M, Ward JF, Piper NY, et al. Ureteral stenting after ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi; a multi-institutional prospective randomized controlled study assessing pain, outcomes and complications. J Urol. 2001;166(5):1651-7.