DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20184505

Comparative study between sequential use of Foley catheter with vaginal misoprostol versus sequential use of oral mifepristone with vaginal misoprostol for second trimester medical abortion

Michelle N. Fonseca, Vernica Sah

Abstract


Background: Abortions are one of the most commonly performed procedures in gynaecological departments worldwide. They are still a major problem in developing countries contributing to a significant percentage of maternal morbidity and mortality. The main objective of this study is to compare the efficacy, side effects and acceptability of intracervical Foley and oral Mifepristone both followed with sequential administration of vaginal misoprostol for second trimester medical abortion.

Methods: This was a prospective randomized trial of 36 healthy women opting for termination of pregnancy with ultrasound confirmed intrauterine gestation between 12 to 20 completed weeks. Intracervical Foley catheter with administration of misoprostol (200µg) vaginally was done for Group A. Mifepristone 200mg was administered on day one followed by misoprostol (200µg) vaginally, 48 hours later, to Group B. Both groups received misoprostol (200µg) vaginally at 4 hourly intervals. Completeness of abortion was assessed, and surgical evacuation was performed, if abortion was found to be incomplete.

Results: The two groups were comparable with respect to age, parity and gestational age. 83-89% of the women in both the groups had complete abortion. The mean induction abortion interval was 20.11 hours in Group A and 54.77 hours in Group B, which was statistically significant. Side effect profile was comparable in both groups however the intensity and the duration of persistence of pain was greater among patients from Group A.

Conclusions: Authors conclude that medical abortions with both methods were found to be safe, effective, inexpensive and acceptable methods. Whereas a shorter induction abortion interval was observed in the Foley induction group, induction with mifepristone was the preferred regimen in second trimester abortion because of its high efficacy, low incidence of side effects, better tolerance by the patients and due to lower dose of misoprostol required following mifepristone administration.


Keywords


Foley catheter, Induction abortion interval, Mifepristone, Misoprostol, Trimester

Full Text:

PDF

References


World Health Organization scientific group. Medical methods for termination of pregnancy: report of a WHO Scientific Group. World Health Organization technical report series. 1997;871:1-110.

Yadav R. Comparative study of extra amniotic 15 methyl prostaglandin F and extra amniotic ethacridine lactate instillation for midtrimester termination of pregnancy. Inter J Gynaecol Obstet Ind. 2005;8:40-3.

Islam A, Abbasi A, Sarwar I. Use of Foley's catheter and prostaglandin F-2 alpha in second trimester termination of pregnancy. JAMC. 2006;18(3):35-9.

Liu HS, Yu MH, Chang YK, Chu TY. Second and early third trimester pregnancy termination by extra amniotic balloon and intra cervical PGE2. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998;60:29-34.

Hamilton J. Historical Review of British Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Edinburgh and London: E and S Livingston Ltd. 1954;950.

Embrey MP, Mollison BG. The unfavourable cervix and induction of labour using a cervical balloon. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1967;74:44-8.

Hackett GA, Reginald P, Paintin DB. Comparison of the Foley catheter and dinoprostone for cervical preparation before second trimester abortion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989:96:1432-4.

Mark A. Fritz, Leon Speroff. Family Planning, Sterilization and Abortion. In: Clinical Gynaecologic Endocrinology and Infertility South Asian edition, 8th ed. 940-943.

Bhathena RK, Sheriar NK, Walvekar VR, Guillebaud J. Second trimester pregnancy termination using extraamniotic ethacridine lactate. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97:1026-9.

Allahbadia G. Comparative study of mid trimester termination of pregnancy using hypertonic saline, Ethacridine lactate, prostaglandin analogue and iodine- saline. J Indian Med Assoc. 1992;90(9):237-9.

Bebbington MW, Kent N, Lim K, Gagnon A, Delisle MF, Tessier F, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing two protocols for use of misoprostol in midtrimester pregnancy termination. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;187(4):853-7.

Elsheikh A, Antsaklisv A. Use of Misoprostol for termination of second trimester pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2001;265(4):204-6.

Bugalho, Bique C, Bergstrom S. Pregnancy interruption by vaginal Misoprostol. Obstet Gynaec Invest. 1993;36:226-9.

Jain JK, Mishell DR. A comparison of intravaginal Misoprostol with prostaglandin E2 for termination of second trimester pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(5):290-3.

Herabutya Y, Chanrachakul B, Punyavachira P. Vaginal Misoprostol in termination of second trimester pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2000;26(2):121-5.

Prachasilpchai N, Russameecharoen K, Borriboonhirunsarn D. Success rate of Second Trimester Termination of pregnancy. J Med Assoc Thai. 2006;89(8):115-9.

Agarwal S, Chaturvedi B. An experience with misoprostol in second trimester MTP. J Obstet Gynae India. 2002;52(5):52-4.

Dicknson JE, Evans SF. The optimization of intravaginal Misoprostol dosing schedules in second trimester pregnancy termination. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(3):470-4.

Patel U, Chauhan K, Singhi S, Kanani M. Second trimester abortion- mifepristone and misoprostol or misoprostol alone. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2013;2(3):315-9.