DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20183871

Pharmaceutical versus mechanical induction of labor

Malak Alsaif, Nayel Helmy, Fatimah Almuallem, Shahad Almagboul, Hilyil Almtrafi, Bashaer Matouq, Nawfal Alsufayan, Ruba Saleh, Sultan Aldalbahi, Afnan Alshahrani

Abstract


Labor induction is one of the most common obstetric interventions carried out in obstetric institutions. More than one fifth of labors needs induction. To date, many methods are available for labor induction with the pharmaceutical and mechanical methods being the commonest. The most common pharmaceutical agents used are prostaglandins, oxytocin, synthetic progesterone antagonists, and nitric oxide. Mechanical induction is carried out through using balloon catheters, hygroscopic dilators, artificial membrane rupture, or membrane stripping. Though pharmaceutical methods had largely replaced mechanical induction of labor, no consensus guidelines recommend their use. Studies from literature are still conflicting. However, it is generally agreed that the use of a combined approach with both pharmaceutical and mechanical methods of induction yields the best outcome. This article will review the different methods for labor induction, their effectiveness, and adverse events.


Keywords


Labor induction, Mechanical induction, Pharmaceutical induction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Levine LD, Downes KL, Elovitz MA, Parry S, Sammel MD, Srinivas SK. Mechanical and Pharmacologic Methods of Labor Induction: A Randomized Controlled Trial. In: Obstetrics and Gynecology. Vol 128. ; 2016:1357-1364.

Bonsack CF, Lathrop A, Blackburn M. Induction of Labor: Update and Review. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014;59(6):606-615.

Induction L. ACOG Committee Opinion no. 597: Committee on Obstetric Practice: Labor induction or augmentation and autism. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(5):1140-1142.

L. S. Induction of labor. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd. 2014;162(1):75-84.

Gilstrop M, Sciscione A. Induction of labor-Pharmacology methods. Semin Perinatol. 2015;39(6):463-465.

Alfirevic Z, Kelly AJ, Dowswell T. Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(4).

Budden A, Henry A, Heatley E. Oxytocin infusion regimens for induction of labour. In: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Vol 122. ; 2012:163.

Løkkegaard E, Lundstrøm M, Kjær MM, Christensen IJ, Pedersen HB, Nyholm H. Prospective multi-centre randomised trial comparing induction of labour with a double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone. J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore). 2015;35(8):797-802.

Chyu JK, Strassner HT. Prostaglandin E2for cervical ripening: A randomized comparison of Cervidil versus Prepidil. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(3):606-611.

Ferguson JE, Head BH, Frank FH, et al. Misoprostol versus low-dose oxytocin for cervical ripening: A prospective, randomized, double-masked trial. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Vol 187. ; 2002:273-280.

Hapangama D, Neilson JP. Mifepristone for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(3).

Prairie BA, Lauria MR, Kapp N, MacKenzie T, Baker ER, George KE. Mifepristone versus laminaria: a randomized controlled trial of cervical ripening in midtrimester termination. Contraception. 2007;76(5):383-388.

Ghosh A, Lattey KR, Kelly AJ. Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016(12).

Bullarbo M, Orrskog ME, Andersch B, Granström L, Norström A, Ekerhovd E. Outpatient vaginal administration of the nitric oxide donor isosorbide mononitrate for cervical ripening and labor induction postterm: a randomized controlled study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(1).

Kelly Anthony J, Munson C, Minden L. Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(6).

Jozwiak M, Bloemenkamp KWM, Kelly AJ, Mol BWJ, Irion O, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2012;(3):CD001233.

McCarthy FP, Kenny LC. Induction of labour. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2014;24(1):9-15.

Maroto Martín MT, Revelles Paniza L, Ruiz Durán S, Copado Salido S, Barranco Armenteros M, Puertas Prieto A. Mechanical methods for labour induction. J Perinat Med. 2015;43.

Ballarat Health Services. Induction of labour: Transcervical Catheter. Induction labour transcervical Catheter. 2011;7(3):481-509.

Arshad AH, Zainuddin AA, Ghani NAA, Ali A. The efficiency of laminaria as an adjunct to induction of labour with prostin: A randomised controlled trial. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;123:156.

Emarah M. Stripping of Membranes in Induction of Labour. Int J Recent Adv Multidiscip Res. 2015;02(10):875-878.

Bricker L, Luckas M. Amniotomy alone for induction of labour. In: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2000.

Goetzl L. Methods of Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;57(2):377-390.

Henry A, Madan A, Reid R, et al. Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: A randomised trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13.

Boulvain M, Kelly AJ, Irion O. Intracervical prostaglandins for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(1).

Mozurkewich EL, Chilimigras JL, Berman DR, et al. Methods of induction of labour: A systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-11-84

Carbone JF, Tuuli MG, Fogertey PJ, Roehl KA, MacOnes GA. Combination of foley bulb and vaginal misoprostol compared with vaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening and labor induction: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(2 PART 1):247-252.

Al-Ibraheemi Z, Brustman L, Bimson BE, Porat N, Rosenn B. Misoprostol With Foley Bulb Compared With Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(1):23-29.

Chung JH, Huang WH, Rumney PJ, Garite TJ, Nageotte MP. A prospective randomized controlled trial that compared misoprostol, Foley catheter, and combination misoprostol-Foley catheter for labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(4):1031-1035.