Classification of cesarean section through Robson criteria: an emerging concept to audit the increasing cesarean section rate


  • Anita Kant Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Asian Institute of Medical Sciences, Faridabad, Haryana, India
  • Shweta Mendiratta Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Asian Institute of Medical Sciences, Faridabad, Haryana, India



Cesarean section, Robson’s classification


Background: There has been an increase in rate of cesarean section over last five decades. This is a matter of international public health concern as it increases the cesarean section related maternal morbidity. The aim of the present study was to audit the increasing rate of caesarean section.

Methods: In the present study, all cases delivered by cesarean section during the period of six months were recorded and classified according to Robson's 10 group classification system. This was an attempt to see which clinically relevant groups contributed most to the cesarean deliveries.

Results: There was a trend of increased percentage of cesarean section in group 5 and 2 respectively in present study. Increasingly sedentary lifestyle and poor tolerance to pain are adding to cesarean delivery on maternal request.

Conclusions: We should judiciously make use of vaginal birth after cesarean section but not at the cost of maternal or fetal health. Standardization of indication of cesarean deliveries, regular audits and definite protocols in                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 hospital will aid in curbing the rate of cesarean deliveries in hospitals.


WHO Statement on Cesarean Section Rates; WHO/RHR/15.02. Available at th/cs-statement/en/.

Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gulmezoglu AM, Souza JP, Taneepanichskul S, Ruyan P, et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08. Lancet.2010;375(9713):490-9.

Marshall NE, Fu R, Guise JM. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(3):262.e1-8.

Souza JP, Gülmezoglu AM, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Carroli G, Fawole B, et al. Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004–2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal Perinatal Health. BMC Med. 2010;8(1):71.

FIGO Working Group on Challenges in Care of Mothers and Infants during Labour and Delivery,”Best practise advice on the 10-Group Classification System for caesarean deliveries,” Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2016;135(2);232-3.

Robson M, Murphy M, Byrne F, Quality Assurance, The 10 group classification system (Robson Classification), induction of labour and Caesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(S1):S23-7.

Uniceforg.1.UNICEF DATA.[Online]. Available at

MacDorman MF, Menacker F, Declercq E. Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes. ClinPerinatol 2008;35(2):293-307.

Vogel JP, Betrán AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, et al., Use of the robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. The Lancet Globel Health, 2015;3(5):e260-70.

Stavrou EP, Ford JB, Shand AW, et al. Epidemiology and trends for caesarean section births in New South Wales, Australia: a population- based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011;11(1):8.






Original Research Articles