DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20184535

The relevance of antral follicle count (AFC) as a marker of ovarian reserve in normal and infertile women in a tertiary care centre in Central India

Prasanta K. Nayak, Chandrima Mukherjee, Subarna Mitra

Abstract


Background: The objective of the present study was to establish the role of AFC as a marker of ovarian reserve in fertility-proven and in sub-fertile Indian women, and to establish the baseline cut-off AFC values for Indian women.

Methods: This is an Observational Case-Control type of study. Test subjects (n=30, age range 20-35 years) were selected randomly from all the women coming to our Out-Patient Department with Primary Infertility. Healthy female volunteers (n=30, age range 20-35years) were recruited from the local population. Statistics: Student t test was applied to compare the mean Antral Follicle count between the case and control group. Pearson correlation test was applied to assess the correlation between age and AFC for case and control group.

Results: The results of the study show that there is a significant difference between the number of antral follicles between fertile and infertile women (p < 0.001). The baseline cut-off for successful pregnancy was established as an AFC of 12. There exists negative correlation (r = -0.249) between age and AFC case group indicating as the age increases AFC decreases.

Conclusions: The findings from this study help in strengthening the idea that AFC serves as a marker for ovarian reserve. Our observation indicates that the number of antral follicles is lower in the subfertile patients as compared to the fertile group (in all age groups), in view of the significantly lower median AFC in women of the former group (P < 0.001).


Keywords


Antral follicle count, Infertility, Ovarian reserve

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chachamovich JR, Chachamovich E, Ezer H, Fleck MP, Knauth D, Passos EP. Investigating quality of life and health-related quality of life in infertility: a systematic review. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2010.31(2):101-10.

Inhorn MC. Global infertility and the globalization of new reproductive technologies: Illustrations from Egypt. Soc Sci Ed. 2003;56(9):1837-51.

Wood JW. Fecundity and natural fertility in humans. Oxf Rev Reprod Biol 1989;11:61-109.

Aubuchon M, Burney RO, Schust DJ, Yao MW. Infertility and assisted reproductive technology. In: Berek JS, Berek DL, editors. Berek and Novak's Gynecology. 15th ed. New Delhi: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt Ltd; 2012. pp. 1133-88.

Agarwal A, Verma A, Agarwal S, Shukla RC, Jain M, Srivastava A. Antral follicle count in normal (fertility-proven) and infertile Indian women. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2014;24(3):297-302.

Block E. Quantitative morphological investigations of the follicular system in women; variations at different ages. Acta Anat (Basel) 1952;14(12):108–23.

Faddy MJ, Gosden RG, Gougeon A, Richardson SJ, Nelson JF. Accelerated disappearance of ovarian follicles in mid-life: implications for forecasting menopause. Hum Reprod 1992;7(10):1342–6.

Lass A, Skull J, McVeigh E, Margara R, Winston RM. Measurement of ovarian volume by transivaginal sonography before ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotrophin for in-vitro fertilization can predict poor response. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(2):294-7.

Tomas C, Nuojua-Huttunen S, Martikainen H. Pretreatment transivaginal ultrasound examination predicts ovarian responsiveness to gonadotropins in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(2):220-3.

Ng EH, Yeung WS, Fong DY, Ho PC. Effects of age on hormonal and ultrasound markers of ovarian reserve in Chinese women with proven fertility. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(10):2169-74.

Bancsi LF, Broekmans FJ, Eijkemans MJ, de Jong FH, Habbema JD, te Velde ER. Predictors of poor ovarian response in in vitro fertilization: A prospective study comparing basal markers of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(2):328-36.

Scheffer GJ, Broekmans FJM, Dorland M, Habbema JDF, Looman CWN, te Velde ER. Antral follicle counts by transvaginal ultrasonography are related to age in women with proven natural fertility. FertilSteril 1999;72(5):845-51.

Chang MY, Chiang CH, Hsieh TT, Soong YK, Hsu KH. Use of the antral follicle count to predict the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril 1998;69(3):505-10.

Broekmans FJ, Faddy MJ, Scheffer G, te Velde ER. Antral follicle counts are related to age at natural fertility loss and age at menopause. Menopause 2004;11(6):607-1. 4

World Health Statistics. World Health Organization 2013. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data. Geneva: WHO Press; 2013.

Scheffer GJ, Broekmans FJ, Looman CW, Blankenstein M, Fauser BC, de Jong FH, et al. The number of antral follicles in normal women with proven fertility is the best reflection of reproductive age. Hum Reprod 2003;18(4):700-6.

Muttukrishna S, McGarrigle H, Wakim R, Khadum I, Ranieri DM, Serhal P. Antral follicle count, anti-Müllerian hormone and inhibin B: Predictors of ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology? BJOG 2005;112(10):1384-90.

Hsu A, Arny M, Knee AB, Bell C, Cook E, Novak AL. Antral follicle count in clinical practice: Analyzing clinical relevance. Fertil Steril 2011;95(2):474-9.