DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20160378

Comparative study of abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomies with special reference to immediate sequel, late sequel and complications

Pujitha Devi Suraneni, Sradhanjali Maharana

Abstract


Background: Hysterectomy can be performed by abdominal, vaginal or laparoscopic assisted procedure. Each procedure has its own indications, contraindications, complications, advantages and disadvantages. The objective was to compare abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomies, with special reference to immediate and late sequel and complications.

Methods: Hospital based cross sectional study was carried out for a period of two years among selected 60 women who underwent hysterectomy. Detailed history, complete clinical, obstetric examination, and all necessary investigations were carried out. Comparison in relation to complications, duration of surgery etc for the three types of hysterectomy was done.

Results: The vaginal hysterectomy was found to be more advantageous in cases with uterus less than 12 weeks size and without gross adnexal pathology and laparoscopic hysterectomy is advantageous for the cases with large fibroid, ovarian pathology, endometriosis, adenomyosis or adhesions.

Conclusions: Preference for laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy or vaginal hysterectomy depends on expertise of doctor and selections of patients.


Keywords


Vaginal hysterectomy, Complications, Sequel

Full Text:

PDF

References


Rock JA, Jones HW, editors. Te Linde’s Text Book of Operative Gynecology 10th edition. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 2011:727.

Farquar CM, Steiner CA. Hysterectomy rates in the united states 1990-1997.Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;99:229.

Hysterectomy. National Women‘s Health information center.2006-07-01, retrived. 2007-06-07.

Washington (state) protection and advocacy system The Asley treatment -Washington DC: National disabilities right New York. Retrieved. 2011;03:10.

Campbell ES, Xiao H, Smith MK. Types of hysterectomy: comparison of characteristics, hospital costs, utilization and outcomes. J Reprod Med. 2003;48(12):943-9.

Silva –Filho AL, Werneck RA, de magal haes RS, Belo AV, Triginelli. Abdominal Vs Vaginal hysterectomy: a comparative study of the post operative quality of life and satisfaction. Arch gynecol obstet. 2006;274:21-4.

Isthikhar R. Vaginal hysterectomy is superior than abdominal hysterectomy J.Surg pak. 2008;13:55-8.

Summit RL, Stovall TG, Steege JF, Lipscomb GH. A multicentre randomized comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;92:321-6.

Ottosen C, Lingman G, Ottosen L. Three methods for hysterectomy a randomized prospective study of short term outcome British J Obstet Gyneco. 2000;107:1380-5.

Hwang JL, Seow KM, Jsai VL, Hwang LW, Hsiech BC, Lee C. Comparative study of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy for uterine myoma larger than 6cm in diameter or uterus weighing at least 450g;a propective randomized study Acta Obstretrician ET Gynecol Scand. 2002;81:1132-8.

Garry R, fountain J, Mason S, Napp V, Brown J, Harve. The evaluate study: two parallel randomized trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopy with vaginal hysterectomy. British medical Journal. 2004;328(7432):129-33.

Aniulene R, Varzgaliene L, Varzgalis M. A comparative analysis of hysterectomies. Medicina (Kaunas). 2007;43(2):118-124.

Ribiero SC, Ribiero RM, Santos NC, pinotti JA. A randomized study of total abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2003;83:37-43.

Meikle SF, Nugent EW, Orleans M. Complications recovery from LAVH compared with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:3.

Rosita A, Laima V, Manvydas VA. A comparative analysis of hysterectomies. Medicina (Kaunas) 2007;43(2):118-124.

Ferrari MM, Berlanda N, Mezzopane R, Ragusa G, Cavallo M, Pardi G. Identifying the indications for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomised comparison with abdominal hysterectomy in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids. British J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;107:620-5.

Schutz K, Possover M, Merker A, Michels A, Schneider A. Prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) with abdominal hysterectomy (AH) for the treatment of the uterus weighing >200g. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:121-5.

Muzii L, Basile S, Zupi E, Marconi D, Zullo MA, Manci N, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus minilaparotomy hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14(5):610-5.

Kluivers KB, Johnson NP, Chien P, Vierhout ME, Bongers M, Mol BW. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy in terms of quality of life: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;136(1):3-8.

Amirikia H, Evans TN. Ten-year review of hysterectomies: trends, indications, and risks. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979;134(4):431-7.