DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20184926

Maternal and fetal outcome in emergency versus elective caesarean section

Sonal Agrawal, Vimal K. Agarwal

Abstract


Background: Caesarean section preferred as an emergency or elective procedure are entirely different entities according to measures taken, facilities and skilled staff available and preparation done. It has been shown that risk of surgical complications is greater with emergency compared with elective caesarean section.

Methods: Present study is a retrospective study, designed to evaluate maternal and fetal outcomes in elective versus emergency caesarean section performed at our hospital from January 2016 to December 2016.

Results: Out of 2156 caesarean, 1628 were emergency and 528 were elective caesarean section.  In our study overall intra operative complications were 11.08% which was mainly contributed to emergency group.

Conclusions: The elective caesarean section shows less maternal and perinatal complications as compared to emergency caesarean sections. Increasing incidence of emergency caesarean section can be reduced by encouraging all pregnant females to visit antenatal clinics.


Keywords


Caesarean section, Fetal outcome, Maternal outcome

Full Text:

PDF

References


Notzon FC, Cnattingius S, Bergsjø P, Cole S, Taffel S, Irgens L, et al. Cesarean section delivery in the 1980's: International comparison by indication. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170(2):495-504.

Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW et al. Maternal and perinatal outcome associated with trial of labour after prior caesarean delivery. N Eng J. Med, 2005;352(25):1718-20.

Gabert HA, Bey M. History and development of cesarean operation. Obstet Gynecol Clinic North Am. 1988;15(4):591-605.

Amirikia H, Zarewych B, Evans TN. Cesarean section: A 15-year review of changing incidence, indications, and risks. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;140(1):81-90.

Chamberlain G. What is the correct caesarean section rate? BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;100(5):403-4.

Adashek JA, Peaceman AM, Lopez-Zeno JA, Minogue JP, Socol ML. Factors contributing to the increased cesarean birth rate in older parturient women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169(4):936-40.

McCARTHY FP, Rigg L, Cady L, Cullinane F. A new way of looking at Caesarean section births. Aus NZ J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;47(4):316-20.

Ali M, Hafeez R, Ahmad M. Maternal and fetal outcome; comparison between emergency caesarean section versus elective caesarean section. Profes 2005;12(1):32-9.

Nelson KB, Dambrosia JM, Ting TY, Grether JK. Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy. New Eng J Med. 1996;334(10):613-9.

Mulhim AA, Ali MHA, Abu-Heija TA, Bahnasy A. Factors affecting the rate and the indications of primary caesarean section. Bahrain Medical Bulletin 2001;23(4):160-62.

Onankpa B, Ekele B. Fetal outcome following caesarean section in a university teaching hospital. J Natl Med assoc.2009;101(6):578-81.

Gasparovic EV, Pulanic KT, Peter B. Maternal and fetal outcome in elective versus emergency section in a developing country. Coll Antropol.2006;30(1):113-18.

Gaym A. Perinatal mortality audit at Jimma hospital, south western Ethiopia. Ethiop. J Health Dev. 2001;14(3):335-43.