DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20190898

Vaginal hysterectomy a safe option in non-descent uterus as compared to abdominal hysterectomy

Sona Singh, Vishal Gajbhiye

Abstract


Background: The objective of present study was to compare the advantage of vaginal hysterectomy over abdominal hysterectomy in non-descent uterus.

Methods: A non-randomized controlled trial was carried out in the Bundelkhand Medical College, Sagar and associated hospital from October 2015 to September 2017. A total of 150 cases were included in the study. Out on 150, 75 underwent vaginal hysterectomy for non-descent uterus and other 75 underwent abdominal hysterectomy for similar indications.

Results: Among total 150 cases, 75 were underwent non-descent vaginal hysterectomy and similar number of cases underwent abdominal hysterectomy. Common age group was 35-54 years. Commonest indication was DUB (48.7%). Postoperatively, complications were more common in those who underwent abdominal hysterectomy such as ambulation (18 hours), incidence of nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, bladder injury and wound infection were less in vaginal hysterectomy compared to abdominal hysterectomy. It was also observed that blood transfusion requirement, operative timing and hospital stay (3 days) were less in vaginal hysterectomy group.

Conclusions: Vaginal hysterectomy for benign gynecological disorders is a safe, effective, least invasive and is associated with lesser complications as compare to abdominal hysterectomy. Today in the era where patient is more cosmetically concern, vaginal hysterectomy for non-descent uterine disorder needs to be considered as good and safe option.


Keywords


Nausea, Non-descent uterus and abdominal hysterectomy, Vaginal hysterectomy, Vomiting

Full Text:

PDF

References


Meikle SF, Nugent SW, Oleans M. Complications and recovery from laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:304-11.

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444: Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynaecol 2009;114(5):1156-8.

Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;110(5):1091-5.

Under JB. Vaginal hysterectomy for the woman with moderately enlarged uterus weighing 200 to 700 grams. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:1337-44.

McCracken G, Hunter D, Morgan D, Price JH. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy. Ulster Med J. 2006;75(1):54-8.

Sheth SS. Vaginal hysterectomy. In; Puri R, Malhotra N, eds. Operative Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1st ed. New Delhi. Jaypee Brother’s Medical Publishers. 2009: 499-510.

Thomas GS. Hysterectomy. Eds. Berek and Novak’s Gynecology. 14th Edition. 2007;22(c):805.

Dewan R, Agarwal S, Minocha B, Sen SK. Non-descent vaginal hysterectomy: an experience. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2004;54(4):376-8.

Bharatnur S. Comparative study of abdominal versus vaginal hysterectomy in non-descent cases. Internet J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;15(2):1528-39.

Bhadra B, Choudary AP, Tolassaria A, Nupur N. Non-descent vaginal hysterectomy (NDVH): personal experiences in 158 cases. AL Ameen J Med Sci. 2011;4(1):23-7.

Mehla S, Chutani N, Gupta M. Non-decent vaginal hysterectomy: personal experience of 105 cases. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4(1):61-5.

Purohit RK, Tripathy PN, Patnaik AK. Vaginal hysterectomy using electrocautery and Purohit approach to uterine artery. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2003;53:475-8.

Dorsey JA, Steinberg EP, Holtz PM. Clinical indications for hysterectomy route; patient characteristics or physician preference? Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;173:1452-60.

Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S, Napp V, Brown J, Hawe J, et al. The evaluate study: two parallel randomized trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy and the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ. 2004;328:129-33.

Chen B, Ren DP, Li JX, Li CD. Comparison of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective non-randomized trial. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;30(4):875-9.

Aniuliene R, Varzgaliene L, Varzgalis M. A comparative analysis of hysterectomies. Medicina (Kaunas). 2007;43:118-24

Goswami V, Singh DR. Impact of mobile phone addiction on adolescent’s life: A literature review. Int J Home Sci.2016;2(1):69-74.

Joshi SA. Comparative study of vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in non-descent uterus. Indian J Obstetr Gynecol Res. 2016;3(4):379-82.