Assessment of perimenopausal bleeding

Authors

  • Mimansa Baghel Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sri Aurobindo institute of Medical sciences, Indore, India
  • N. Chandwaskar Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sri Aurobindo institute of Medical sciences, Indore, India
  • Sweta Agrawal Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sri Aurobindo institute of Medical sciences, Indore, India
  • Shikha Sonker Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sri Aurobindo institute of Medical sciences, Indore, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20160396

Keywords:

Menorrhagia, Polymenorrhagia, Perimenopausal bleeding, Abnormal uterine bleeding, Metorrhagia, Metropathica haemorrhagica

Abstract

Background: Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is one of the most common presenting complaints encountered in a Gynecologist's office and accounts for almost 10% consultations in any busy out-patient clinic. Perimenopause is defined as the time around menopause during which menstrual cycle and endocrine changes are occurring but 12 months of amenorrhea has not yet occurred. Patients usually present first to their family physicians, who can do most of the diagnostic workup and management.

Methods: 200 women of perimenopausal age group with AUB presenting to gynecology OPD and wards of Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SAMC & PGI, Indore. The study was conducted from May 2013 to April 2014.

Results: In our present study majority (57%) of the women in our study were in the age group 40-45 years and rest were having age more than 46 years. In our present study 52% of the women presented with menorrhagia, 16.5% presented with polymenorrhagia, 11.5% presented with metropathia haemorrhagica, 9% presented with polymenorrhoea, 4.5% presented with metrorrhagia.

Conclusions: There are various menstrual irregularities during perimenopausal period, some due to variation in hormones which are physiological some due to pathological changes. Every case of perimenopausal bleeding needs evaluation. Base line investigations should be offered to all the patients. Public awareness programme in the community and yearly physical checkup should be advised to all the patients.

References

Kotdawala P, Kotdawala S, Nagar N. Evaluation of endometrium in perimenopausal abnormal uterine bleeding. J Midlife Health. 2013;4(1):16-21.

Hunter DC, McClure N. Abnormal uterine bleeding: an evaluation endometrial biopsy, vaginal ultrasound and outpatient hysteroscopy. Ulster Med J. 2001;70(1):25-30.

Vilos GA, Lefebvre G, Graves GR. Guidelines for the management of abnormal uterine bleeding. J Obstet Gynecol Can. 2001;23(8):704-9.

Subhankar D, Chakraborty B, Karim R, Aich RK, Mitra PK, Ghosh TK. Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in perimenopausal Age: diagnostic options and accuracy. J Obst Gynecol India. 2011;61(2):189-94.

Soules MR, Sherman S, Parrott E, Rebar R, Santoro N, Utian W et al. Executive summary: stages of reproductive aging workshop (STRAW) Park City, Utah, July 2001. Menopause. 2001;8:402-7.

Nelson HD, Haney E, Humphrey L, Miller J, Nedrow A, Nicolaidis C et al. 120 management of menopause‐related symptoms: summary; current as of March 2005.

Telner DE, Jakubovicz D. Approach to diagnosis and management of abnormal uterine bleeding. Can Fam Physician. 2007;53(1):58-64.

Roy PK, Singh P, Singh VK, Mahadik K, Jain R National J Integr Res Med. 2013;4(2):144-8.

Tariq S, Humaira T. Histopathological findings in menorrhagia: a study of hysterectomy specimens. Pal J Pathol. 2005;16(3):83-5.

Joshi SK, Deshpande DH. Clinico-pathological study in 274 cases of dysfunctional uterine haemorrhage. J Obstet Gyencol India. 1964,14(2):360-71.

Goldstein SR, Zeltser I, Horan CK, Snyder JR, Schwartz LB. Ultrasonography-based triage for perimenopausal patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(1):102-8.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-17

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles