DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20190893

Evaluation of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCD) insertion: 5 years study

Ramalingappa C. Antaratani, Vinay Raju D., Sanjana K.

Abstract


Background: The intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) primarily in the form of copper T is used by more than 150 million women around the world making it the most widely used reversible method of contraception with a remarkably low failure rate of less than 1 per 100 women in the first year of use for cu T 380 A. It is more suitable for a country like India which is in urgent need of population control methods.

Methods: A Prospective observational study was under taken where in a series of women who delivered either vaginally or through caesarean section during the period of November 2013 to October 2017 in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli counseled for PPIUCD insertion were included in the study. Mothers who were suffered from Chorioamnionitis, Puerperal sepsis, Postpartum haemmorrhage, PROM more than 18 hours, extensive genital trauma, uterine abnormalities, Multiple sexual partners and obstructed labour were excluded from the study. Since it was a time bound study, a total of 16009 cases were enrolled in the study after counseling them.

Results: A total of 16009 women were counseled to undergo PPIUCD, out which 5144 women accepted for PPIUD amounting to a total acceptance rate of 32.1%.Out of the 10865 women who did not accept device, the reason for non-acceptance preference another contraception 60%, family opposition was reason in 21% of women, while 08% of women had side effects from their previous use. 11% of women said that they were not desire to use contraception.

Conclusions: Family planning and mother and child health services are supplied to the people free of cost in India. Use of an intrauterine device is simpler , less expensive, and immediately reversible.


Keywords


Less expensive, PPIUCD, Reversible contraceptive

Full Text:

PDF

References


RutsteinS : Further Evidence of the effects of preceding Birth intervals on Neonatal, infant and under five years Mortality and Nutritional status in Developing Countries: Evidence from the Demographic and Health Surveys. DHS Working papers No.41. Macro International; 2008.

World Health Organization.Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. Geneva:World Health Organisation; 2010. Available at www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/family planning/9789241563888/en/

Cleland J, Bernstein S, Faundes A, Glasier A, Innis J. Family planning the unfinished agenda. Lancet. 2006;368(9549):1810-27.

Aisien AO, Intrauterine Contraceptive Device(IUCD): Acceptability and Effectiveness in a Territory Institution, Afr J Med Sci. 2007;36(3):193-200.

International Postpartum Family planning Program: Report on the First Year, Studies in Family Planning. Populat Council Publi. 1967; 1(22):p1-23.

Sharma M, Joshi S, Nagar O, Sharma A, Determim=nants of Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Discontinuation among Indian Woman. J Obstet Gynaecol India,2014;64(3):p208-211.

Sanskriti P, Amita T, Pratima M, Rupali D, Jyotsna S, Kumar A. Exploring reasons behind Low acceptance for PPIUCD in postnatal women, New Indian J Surg. 2011;2(4):p246.

Eroglu K, Akkuzu G, Vural G, Dilbaz B, Akin A, Taskin L, Haberal A, Comparison of efficacy and complications of IUD insertion in immediate post-placental/early postpartum period with interval period: 1 year follow up. Contracep. 2006;74: p376-81.

Chi C, Postpartum IUD insertion: timing, route, lactation, and uterine perforation., Proceedings from the Fourth International Conference on IUDs, Boston: Butterworth Heinemann; 1994; p219-227.

Celen S, Moroy P, Sucak A, Aktulay A, Danisman N, Clinical Outcomes of early postplacental insertion of Intrauterine Contraceptive Device. Contracep. 2004;69(4): p279-82.

O’Hanley K, Huber DH, Postpartum IUDs: Keys for success. Contracep. 1992;45(4):p351-61.