DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20160402

Relaparotomy: review of indications and outcome in tertiary care hospital

Prachi Srivastava, Sabuhi Qureshi, Uma Singh

Abstract


Background: Relaparotomy is a rare complication after surgery associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Inappropriate selection of patients for relaparotomy, especially those who will not clearly benefit from surgery can be deleterious. This study was thus, planned to identify the indications, procedure, risk factors and outcomes of relaparotomy.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King George’s Medical University from January 2008 to January 2014.

Results: 19 cases of relaparotomy were identified. 17 patients (89.5%) had emergency primary surgery while 2 (10.5%) had elective surgery. Majority of patients required relaparotomy in view of hemorrhage (63.15%) followed by burst abdomen (31.5%) and bowel injury (5.26%). Obstructed labor was the major indication of primary surgery in patients operated for burst abdomen while placenta previa was the major indication of primary surgery in patients operated for PPH. Increased duration of hospital stay, requirement of blood transfusion and incidence of post-operative fever and sepsis was seen in patients undergoing relaparotomy. Out of 19 patients, 3 (15.7%) patients died.

Conclusions: Relaparotomy is a rare condition which surgeon might have to encounter. However, ensuring proper hemostasis and asepsis during surgical procedures can reduce the incidence of relaparotomy. Calculative decision before embarking on relaparotomy can decrease the incidence of morbidity and mortality associated with the procedure.


Keywords


Relaparotomy, Hemorrhage, Burst abdomen, Sepsis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Unalp HR, Kamer E, Kar H, Bal A, Peserkoy M, Onal MA. Urgent abdominal re-exploration. World J Emerg Surg. 2006;1:10.

Sak ME, Turgut A, Evsen MS, Soydinc HE, Ozler A, Sak S, Gul T. Relaparotomy after initial surgery in obstetrics and gynecology operations: analysis of 113 cases. Ginekol Pol. 2012;83(6):429-32.

Biswas SP, Halder S, Shirin FB. Indications and outcome of relaparotomy after cesarean section. Bang Med J (Khulna). 2012;45:19-23.

Levin I, Rapaport AS, Salzer L, Maslovitz S, Lessing JB, Almog B. Risk factors for relaparotomy after caesarean delivery. Int J of Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;119(2):163-5.

Seal SL, Kamilya G, Bhattacharya SK, Mukherji J, Bhattacharya AR. Relaparotomy after cesarean delivery: experience from an Indian teaching hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007;33(6):804-9.

Khan NBA, Kolasseri SS. Relaparotomy after caesarean section: an analysis of the risk factors, indications and outcome. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;4(3):575-80.

Dasgupta S, Sharma PP, Kalra A, Mukhopadhyay P, Mahajan K, Dasgupta S. Early reoperations after gynecological and obstetrical surgery - a five years. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2010;60(6):507-10.

Falcone T, Stovall G. In: Berek JS, Berek DL. Berek and Novak’s Gynecology.15th ed.New Delhi: Wolter Kluwer. 2013:831.

Unalp HR, Kamer E, Onal MA. Analysis of early relaparotomy after lower gastrointestinal system surgery. Surgery Today. 2008;38(4):323-8.