Study on safety of non-descent vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uterine size for benign uterine pathologies


  • Neelam Manda Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • Oby Nagar Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • Lata Rajoria Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • C. P. Dadhich Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Eternal Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India



Enlarged uterus, Non-prolapsed, Vaginal hysterectomy


Background: Vaginal hysterectomy is less commonly performed for benign pathologies if the uterine size exceeds 12 weeks in the belief that complications could be higher in this group. The aim of this prospective study was to compare surgical outcomes and safety of vaginal hysterectomy in women with non-prolapsed uteri of >12 weeks size to those with uteri of<12 weeks removed vaginally for similar indications.

Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 92 patients were included who underwent NDVH for benign uterine conditions between May 2016 to December 2018. The index group comprised 32 women who underwent vaginal hysterectomy for non-prolapse uterus with uterine enlargement (>12 weeks), while the control group consisted of 60 women with uteri <12 weeks. Demographic data, duration of surgery, blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications were compared.

Results: Women in the two groups had statistically similar mean age, Body Mass Index and parity (44 vs 42.77 years, 20.8 vs 21.56 kg m3 and 3.26 vs 3.83, respectively; p > 0.05). The mean operative time was significantly longer in the index group (62.47min; vs 48.17 min; p <0.0001). Women with enlarged uteri had greater mean estimated blood loss (123.2 ml vs 75.9 ml; p < 0.0001) but the mean length of hospital stay was similar (5.531 days vs 5.177 days; p > 0.05). Intra- and post-operative complications such as blood transfusion and pelvic sepsis, post-operative febrile illness and systemic infections were comparable in both groups.

Conclusions: Vaginal hysterectomy in larger non-prolapsed uteri takes longer to perform and is associated with more blood loss compared to uteri <12 weeks but is not associated with a significant increase in complication rates.


Vessey MP, Villard‐Mackintosh LA, Mcpherson K, Coulter A, Yeates D. The epidemiology of hysterectomy: findings in a large cohort study. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;99(5):402-7.

Niebuhr TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(3):CD003677.

David-Montefiore E, Rouzier R, Chapron C, Darai E, Collegiale d’Obstétrique et Gynécologie de Paris-Ile de France. Surgical routes and complications of hysterectomy for benign disorders: a prospective observational study in French university hospitals. Human Reproduct. 2007;22(1):260-5.

Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009(3).

Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Tavender E, Garry R, Mol BW, Kluivers KB. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015(8).

Ottosen C, Lingman G, Ottosen L. Three methods for hysterectomy: a randomised, prospective study of short-term outcome. BJOG. 2000;107(11):1380–5.

Ribeiro SC, Ribeiro RM, Santos NC, Pinotti JA. A randomized study of total abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;83(1):37-43.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 311, April 2005. Appropriate use of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(4):929.

Yi YX, Zhang W, Zhou Q, Guo WR, Su Y. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy vs abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Europe J Obstet Gynecol Reproduct Biol. 2011 Nov 1;159(1):1-8.

Coulam CB, Pratt JH. Vaginal hysterectomy: is previous pelvic operation a contraindication? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1973;116(2):252-60.

Pitkin RM. Vaginal hysterectomy in obese women. Obstet Gynecol. 1977;49:567.

Pratt JH, Daikoku NH. Obesity and vaginal hysterectomy. J Reprod Med. 1990;35:945.

Akyol D, Esinler I, Guven S, Salman MC, Ayhan A. Vaginal hysterectomy: results and complications of 886 patients. J Obstet Gynaecol.2006;26(8):777-781.

Kennedy JS, Stranahan PL, Taylor KD, Chandler JG. High-burst strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing. Surg Endosc. 1998;12(6):876-8.

Hefni MA, Bhaumik J, El-Toukhy T, Kho P, Wong I, Abdel- Razik T, et al. Safety and efficacy of using the LigaSure™ vessel sealing system for securing the pedicles in vaginal hysterectomy: randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2005;112(3):329-33.

Cronjé HS, De Coning EC. Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;91(3):243- 5.

Elhao M, Abdallah K, Serag I, El-Laithy M, Agur W. Efficacy of using electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy in patients with different degrees of operative difficulty: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;147(1):86-90.

Agrawal VB, Agrawal A, Agrawal SB. Comparison of efficacy of bipolar electrosurgical vessel sealing with conventional suturing in securing vascular pedicles during vaginal hysterectomy. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2014;3(11):1325-9.

Levy B, Emery L. Randomized trial of suture versus electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing in vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(1):147-51.

Silva-Filho AL, Rodrigues AM, Vale de Castro Monteiro M, da Rosa DG, Pereira e Silva YM, Werneck RA, et al. Randomized study of bipolar vessel sealing system versus conventional suture Ligasure for vaginal hysterectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;146(2):200-3.

Benassi L, Rossi T, Kaihura CT, Ricci L, Bedocchi L, Galanti B, et al. Abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(6):1561-5.

Sushil K, Antony ZK. Vaginal hysterectomy for benign non-prolapsed uterus. Initial Experience. J Obstet Gynaecol Ind. 2004;54(1):60-63

Magos A, Bournas N, Sinha R, Richardson RE, O’Connor H. Vaginal hysterectomy for the large uterus. BJOG 1996;103(3):246–51.

Sahin Y. Vaginal hysterectomy and oophorectomy in women with 12–20 weeks’ size uterus. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2007;86(11):1359-69.

Stovall TG, Summit Jr RL, Washburn SA, Ling FW. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist use before hysterectomy. Am J Obstet and Gynecol. 1994;170(5):1744-51.

Melendez J, Bhatia R, Fakokunde A, Yoong W. Medical debulking with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists to facilitate vaginal hysterectomy. Gynecol Surg. 2012;9(1):77-80.

Newbold P, Vithayathil M, Fatania K, Yoong W. Is vaginal hysterectomy is equally safe for the enlarged and normally sized non-prolapse uterus? A cohort study assessing outcomes. Europe J Obstet Gynecol Reproduct Biol. 2015;185:74-7.






Original Research Articles