DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20193554

Congenital anomalies in a tertiary care hospital in North East region, India

R. K. Praneshwari, N. Nabakishore Singh, Akoijam Tamphasana Devi, Jyoti Priya, L. Ranjit Singh

Abstract


Background: Congenital anomalies are important cause of morbidity and mortality in newborns and are defined as structural and functional abnormalities including metabolic disorders present at birth. These defects are of prenatal origin resulting from defective embryogenesis or intrinsic abnormalities in the process of development and are associated with various risk factors.

Methods: Our study is a cross sectional study done at Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal over period of 3 years from January 2015 to December 2017. Aim of study was to find out incidence of congenital anomalies and proportions of different types of congenital anomalies. Outcome was studied in relation to maternal age, religion, parity, and gestational age, sex of the baby, outcome and sex of the baby.

Results: Total numbers of congenital anomalies were 257 babies out of 29879 births giving the incidence of 0.86%. Most common congenital anomalies in this study are musculoskeletal followed by craniospinal, genitourinary, cardiovascular and gastrointestinal. It was more common in preterm babies and parity 1-3, more common in 21-30 years of maternal age. Consanguinity was seen in 7 out of 257 patients.

Conclusions: Congenital malformations are a major cause of still births and infant mortality. Targeted scan should be done at 18-20 week to find out anomalies and reduce the prevalence. There should be widespread education in the community regarding the common congenital malformations, their outcomes and possible available mode of treatment

Keywords


Musculoskeletal, Congenital anomalies, Consanguinity, Craniospinal

Full Text:

PDF

References


Congenital anomalies. Available at www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets. Accessed on 8 December 2017.

Birch MR, Grayson N, Sullivan EA. Birth anomalies series no. 1. Sydney: AIHW National Perinatal Statistics Unit. Recommendations for development of a new Australian birth anomalies system: a review of the congenital malformations and birth defects data collection. AIHWcat. No. PER 23:2004.

What are the types of birth defects. Available at: www.nichd.nih.gov. Accessed on 8 December 2017.

How many people are affected by/at risk for birth defects. Available at: www.nichd.nih.gov. Accessed on 8 December 2017.

How do health care providers diagnose birth defects. Available at: www.nichd.nih.gov. Accessed on 8 December 2017.

Kokate P, Bang R. Study of congenital malformation in tertiary care centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016:6(1):89-93.

Rani Sandhya M, Lakshmi AA. Study of congenital malformations in a tertiary hospital, government general hospital, Guntur. J Dent Med Sci. 2015;14(4):16-20.

Chowdhary P, Devi RKP, Singh LS, Thakare AS, Tamang ZD, Debroy S, et al. Clinical study on congenital malformations at birth in a tertiary level hospital in North - East India. J Dent Med Sci. 2017;16(1):24-7.

Pabbati J, Subramanian P, Sudharshan RC, Sadhana N, Rao R, Study on incidence of congenital anomalies in a rural teaching hospital, Telangana, India. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2016;3(3):887-90.

Hoyert DL, Mathews TJ, Menacker F. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2004. Pediatrics. 2006;117:168-83.

Yoon PW, Olney RS, Khoury MJ, Sappenfield WM, Chavez GF, Taylor D. Contributions of birth defects and genetic diseases to pediatric hospitalizations: a population-based study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151:1096-103.

Lean, Samantha C; Derricott, Hangley, Hayley; Jones, Rebecca L.; Heazell, Alexander EP. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnanacy outcomes: a systematic review and meta- analysis. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(10):e0186287.