DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20193032

Study of antenatal prevalence of HIV and its trend in a tertiary care hospital

Nikhil A. Anand, Seema K. Patel

Abstract


Background: HIV/AIDS has become a global problem since first detection in 1981.Women of childbearing age constitute nearly half of the 30 million adults currently living with HIV/AIDs worldwide. Pregnant women are considered as low risk for HIV so estimating prevalence in such low risk people provides us a good basis for long term strategy for implementation of HIV/AIDS control programme. The objective of this study was to study acceptance of antenatal HIV testing during routine ANC checkups using opt in strategy. To study prevalence of antenatal HIV and its trend.

Methods: Observational and analytic study. Antenatal women coming for routine antenatal care in obstetric OPD were counseled and blood sample were taken according to guidelines for HIV testing from period 1/1/2014 to 31/12/2018.

Results: Out of total 23907 women attending antenatal clinic 23841 accepted HIV testing, Out of these 72 were found positive, making HIV seroprevalence rate of 0.30. 42 spouses were also found positive.

Conclusions: Though seroprevalence of HIV in antenatal women is low, slowly rising trend worths a caution for us.


Keywords


Antenatal, Counseling, HIV/AIDS, Trend, Seroprevalence

Full Text:

PDF

References


UNAIDS. AIDS epidemic update. December 1998. Available at: http://www.unAIDS.org/unAIDS/ document/epidemio/wadr98e.pdf.

National AIDS Control Organisation. Annual Report 2010-11. New Delhi: Department of AIDS Control, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2011:106. Available at: http://naco.gov.in/upload/REPORTS/NACO%20Annual%20Report%202010-11.pdf.

Zaba B, Boerma T, White R. Monitoring the AIDS epidemic using HIV prevalence data among young women attending antenatal clinics: prospects and problems. AIDS Lond Engl. 2000;14(11):1633-45.

Boerma JT, Ghys PD, Walker N. Estimates of HIV-1 prevalence from national population-based surveys as a new gold standard. Lancet Lond Engl. 2003;362(9399):1929-31.

National Institute of Medical Statistics, Indian Council of Medical Research. India- HIV Estimates - 2006. New Delhi: National AIDS Control Organisation, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2007:30. Available at: http://naco.gov.in/upload/Surveillance/Reports% 20&%20Publication/Technical%20Report%20on%20HIV%20Estimation%202006.pdf

Ashtagi GS, Metgud CS, Walvekar PR and Naik VA. Prevalence of HIV among rural pregnant women attending PPTCT services at KLE hospital, Belgaum. Al Ameen J Med Sci. 2011;4(1):45-8.

DeCherney AH, Nathan L, Goodwin TM, Laufer N. Sexually transmitted diseases and pelvic infections. In: DeCherney AH, Nathan L, Goodwin TM, Laufer N, eds. Current Diagnosis and Treatment Obstetrics and Gynecology. 10th ed. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies; 2006:Chp41.

Sindy MP, Denk CE. Screening of HIV in pregnant women in New Jersey. Pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system (PRAMS). Available at: wwwnj.gov/health/fhs/professional/prams.shtml

Egesie UG, Mbooh RT. Seroprevalence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection in pregnant women in Amassoma, Nigeria. African J Biomed Res. 2008;11:111-3.

Imade P, Ibadin K, Eghafona N, Enabulele O and Ophori E. HIV seroprevalence among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic in a tertiary health institutions in Benin city, Nigeria. Macedonian J Med Sci. 2010;3(1):43-5.

Shah I. HIV/AIDS in children. In: Parthasarathy A, editor. Indian Academy of Pediatrics - Textbook of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers; 2013:336-45.

Singh S: Food crisis and AIDS: Indian perspective. Lancet. 2003;362:1938-9.

Postma BJ, Beck EJ, Mandalia S. Universal HIV screening of pregnant women in England: cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ. 1999;318:1656-60.

Ades AE, Gupta R, Gibb DM. Selective versus universal antenatal HIV testing: epidemiological and implementational factors in policy choice. AIDS. 1999;13:271-8.

Committee on Perinatal Transmission of HIV. National Research Council, Institute of Medicine, Public Health Screening Programs In: Stoto MA, Almatio DA, McCormick MC (Eds). Reducing the Odds: Preventing Perinatal Transmission of HIV in the United States. 1998:ch2.

Ukey PM, Akulwar SL, Powar RM: Seroprevalence of human immunodeficiency virus infection in pregnancy in a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Med Sci. 2005;59:382-7.

Pallikadavath S, Jayachandran AA, Stones RW. Women's Reproductive Health, Sociocultural Context and AIDS Knowledge in Northern India. J Health Manag. 2005;7(1):109-28.

Srikanth P, John TJ, Jeyakumari H, Babu PG, Mathai D, Jacob M, et al. Epidemiological features of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome in southern India. Indian J Med Res. 1997;105:191-7.

Barbacci M, Repke JT, Chaisson RE. Routine prenatal screening form HIV infection. Lancet. 1991;337:709-11.

Landesman S, Minkoff H, Holman S. Serosurvey of HIV infection in parturients. Implications for HIV testing programmes of pregnant women. JAMA. 1987;285:2701-3.

Lindgren S, Bohlin A, Forsgren M. Screening for HIV-1 antibodies in pregnancy: results from the Swedish national programme. BMJ. 1993;307:1447-51.

Celentano DD. Is HIV screening in the labor and delivery unit feasible and acceptable in low-income setting? PLOS Med. 2008;5(5)e107.