DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20193526

Maternal and neonatal complications in macrosomic pregnancies

Rehab Husain Basher, Mohmed Soliman Hussien, Nuriya Baharie Nessr

Abstract


 

Background: Fetal macrosomia is a common problem in obstetrics which leads to morbidity and mortality to both mothers as well as to the new-born due to complications of fetal macrosomia like prolonged labour, operative delivery, postpartum haemorrhage, perineal trauma, shoulder dystocia, birth trauma, perinatal asphyxia and perinatal mortality. This prospective study was conducted on fetal macrosomia to help future identification of such pregnancies, anticipate complications and to plan proper management.

Methods: Maternal, fetal and neonatal consequences of macrosomia with specific attention to etiology of macrosomia in 170 pregnant women having gestational age of 37 weeks or more and high risk of fetal macrosomia were studied. Clinical estimation of fetal body weight was done using Leopold’s maneuvers and patient then referred for ultrasonography.  Data was collected about mode of delivery, nature and severity of birth trauma.

Results: It was found that maternal age (51.76%), multiparity (61.76%), maternal diabetes (20.59 %) was significantly associated with macrosomia. Total caesarean rate in macrosomia was 26.4%. We got only 8 cases of birth trauma out of 170 macrosomic births.

Conclusions: Pregnancies complicated by fetal macrosomia can be best managed by giving a trial of labour for babies with fetal weight below 5000 gram. Post gestation, multiparity found to be main risk factor for macrosomia.


Keywords


Caesarean section, Fetal macrosomia, Fetal birth trauma, Large for gestational age, Perineal trauma, Shoulder dystocia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Surkan PJ, Hsieh CC, Johansson AL, Dickman PW, Cnattingius S. Reasons for increasing trends in large for gestational age births. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:720-6.

Onyiriuka AN. High birth weight babies: incidence and foetal outcome in a mission hospital in Benin City, Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2006;9:114-9.

Anoon SS, Rizk DE, Ezimokhai M. Obstetric outcome of excessively overgrown fetuses (>or=5000 g): a case-control study. J Perinat Med. 2003;31:295-301.

Cheng YW, Nicholson JM, Nakagawa S, Bruckner TA, Washington AE, Caughey AB. Perinatal outcomes in low-risk term pregnancies: do they differ by week of gestation? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:370.

Getahun D, Ananth CV, Peltier MR, Salihu HM, Scorza WE. Changes in prepregnancy body mass index between the first and second pregnancies and risk of large-for-gestational-age birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:530.

Kamanu CI, Onwere S, Chigbu B, Aluka C, Okoro O, Obasi M. Fetal macrosomia in African women: a study of 249 cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;279:857-61.

Jolly MC, Sebire NJ, Harris JP, Regan L, Robinson S. Risk factors for macrosomia and its clinical consequences: a study of 350, 311 pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;111:9-14.

Onwude JL, Rao S, Selo-Ojeme DO. Large babies and unplanned Caesarean delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;118:36-9.

Zhang X, Decker A, Platt RW, Kramer MS. How big is too big? The perinatal consequences of fetal macrosomia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:517.

Catalano PM, Thomas A, Presley HL, Amini SB. Increased fetal adiposity: a very sensitive marker of abnormal in utero development. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:1698-701.

Howlim J, Chongtan B, Essa A. Delivery of macrosomic babies. Management and outcomes of 330 cases. J Obstet. Gynaecol. 2002;22:370-4.

Rhodes JC, Kenneth C. Contribution of excess weight gain during pregnancy and macrosomia to the caesarean delivery rate. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;111:1181-5.

Baskett TF, Allen AC. Perinatal implications of shoulder dystocia .Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86:14-7.

Essel JK, Tetteh ET. Macrosomia-maternal and fetal risk factors. S Afr Med J. 1995;85:43-6.

Mello G, Parretti E, Mecacci F, Lucchetti R, Lagazio C, Pratesi M, et al. Risk factors for fetal macrosomia: the importance of a positive oral glucose challenge test. Eur J Endocrinol. 1997;137:27-33.

Spellacy WN, Miller S, Winegar A, Peterson PQ. Macrosomia-maternal characteristics and infant complications. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;66(2):158-61.

Conway DL. Choosing route of delivery for the macrosomic infant of a diabetic mother: caesarean section versus vaginal delivery. J Mat Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002;12(6):442-8.

Mulik V, Usha TS, Bethal J. The outcome of macrosomic fetuses in a low risk primigravid population. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;80(1):15-22.

Mould F. Studying the relationship between macrosomia & maternal and infant complications. 25th international congress of Medical Women's International Association. 2000;18:1426.

Meshari AA, De-Silva S, Rahman I. Fetal macrosomia - maternal risks and fetal outcome. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1990;32:215-22.