DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20193504

Perspectives of health care professionals on artificial insemination of donor semen: appraising their knowledge and perceptions: a single institution study in Nigeria

Olajide O. Abiola, Akinlabi E. Ajao, Olumuyiwa A. Ogunlaja, Sunday O. Adeoye, Ayodeji A. Ojo

Abstract


Background: Artificial inseminations of donor semen (AID) involve use of heterologous donated semen for conception in infertile couple when indicated or in a single woman desirous of pregnancy. Its practice often requires regulation to address possible ethical and legal issues which may arise. In formulating acceptable guidelines/policies, the perspectives of health professionals and the participants should be considered. Therefore, we sought to explore the knowledge and perception of semen donation for artificial insemination among health professionals.

Methods: A cross sectional study conducted on consenting health workers in a single health institution using a structured questionnaire to assess their knowledge and perception on artificial insemination of donor semen (AID). Descriptive and analytical statistics were applied to the data collected with a statistically significant value of <0.05.

Results: One hundred and twenty-one health professionals completed the questionnaires. The mean age of the respondents was 27.58±5.5years. Sixty of the respondents were males while 61 were females. Eighty-four of the respondents (69.4%) demonstrated good knowledge of AID while 37 (30.6%) had poor knowledge. Cadre of health professionals and marital status influenced the knowledge of respondents. Perceptions on AID varied among the respondents mostly influenced by psycho-social factors and possible legal disputes on third party reproductive process. None of the male respondents has ever donated semen and willingness to donate semen was low; with anonymity preferred by the willing donors.

Conclusions: Substantial knowledge gap of AIDS existed among health professionals which were influenced by cadre and marital status. Psycho-social factors and possible legal disputes influenced their perceptions of AID.


Keywords


Artificial insemination of donor semen, Knowledge, Nigeria, Perception, Semen donation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Oguntoyinbo AE, Amole AOD, Komolafe OF. Sonographic assessment of fallopian tube patency in the investigation of female infertility in Ilorin, Nigeria. Afr J Reprod Health. 2001;5:100-5.

Panti AA, Sununu YT. The profile of infertility in a teaching Hospital in North West Nigeria. Sahel Med J. 2014;17(1):7-11.

Inhorn MC. Global infertility and the globalization of new reproductive technologies: illustrations from Egypt. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(9):1837-51.

Ikechebelu JI, Adinma JIB, Orie EF, Ikegwuonu SO. High prevalence of male infertility in southeastern Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;23(6):657-9.

Owolabi AT, Fasubaa OB, Ogunniyi SO. Semen quality of male partners of infertile couples in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2013;16(1):37-40.

Male factor infertility: Management approach. BMJ Best practices. Available at: http://bestpractice.bmj.com/best-practice/monograph /497/treatment/step-by-step.html. Accessed on April 6th, 2019.

Practice committees of the American Society for Reproductive medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Recommendations for gamete and embryo donation: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;9(1):47-62.e1.

Botchan A, Hauser R, Gamzu R, Yogev L, Paz G, Yavetz H. Results of 6139 artificial insemination cycles with donor spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(11):2298-304.

Strickler RC, Keller DW, Warren JC. Artificial insemination with fresh donor semen. N Engl J Med. 1975;293(17):848-53.

Ugwu EO, Odoh GU, Obi SN, Ezugwu FO. Acceptability of artificial donor insemination among infertile couples in Enugu, southeastern Nigeria. Int J Womens Health. 2014;6:201-5.

Gong D, Liu YL, Zheng Z, Tian YF, Li Z. An overview on ethical issues about sperm donation. Asian J Androl. 2009;11(6):645-52.

Ping P, Zhu WB, Zhang XZ. Sperm donation and its application in China: a 7-year multicenter retrospective study. Asian J Androl. 2011;13(4):644-8.

Golombok S, Scott R, Appleby JB. Regulating Reproductive Donation. UK: Cambridge University Press; 2016.

Welcome to the HFEA, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Available at: https://www.hfea.gov.uk/. Accessed on April 13th, 2019.

Cutilli CC. Seeking health information: what sources do your patients use? Orthop Nurs. 2010;29(3):214-9.

Hesse BW, Nelson DE, Kreps GL. Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(22):2618-24.

Medicine EC of the AS for R. Interests, obligations, and rights in gamete donation: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(3):675-81.

Hummel WP, Talbert LM. Current management of a donor insemination program. Fertil Steril. 1989;51(6):919-30.

Report on the regulation of reproductive cell donation in the European Union. 2006. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_threats/human_substance/documents/tissues_frep_en.pdf. Accessed April 8th, 2019.

O’Reilly D, Bowen JM, Perampaladas K, Qureshi R, Xie F, Hughes E. Feasibility of an altruistic sperm donation program in Canada: results from a population-based model. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):8.

Frith L, Blyth E, Farrand A. UK gamete donors’ reflections on the removal of anonymity: implications for recruitment. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(6):1675-80.