One step procedure for screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus by diabetes in pregnancy study group of India

Authors

  • Dwarakanath L. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shree Siddhartha Medical College, Tumkum, Karnataka, India
  • Hema K. R. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shree Siddhartha Medical College, Tumkum, Karnataka, India
  • Hemashree P. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shree Siddhartha Medical College, Tumkum, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20193563

Keywords:

Diabetes in pregnancy study group of india, Gestational Diabetes mellitus, Oral glucose tolerance test, World health organization

Abstract

Background: In the Indian context, screening for Diabetes is essential in all pregnant women, as the Indian women have an eleven-fold increased risk of developing glucose intolerance during pregnancy. For this, we need a simple procedure which is economical and feasible. Hence this study was undertaken as a screening as it is acceptable, economical and feasible to perform. Aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of one step procedure for screening and diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus by Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of India (DIPSI).aim of the study was to study the occurrence of Gestational Diabetes mellitus, Tumkur, to assess the sensitivity and specificity of glucose challenge test, to assess the need for universal screening and to study the maternal and perinatal outcomes in patient with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.

Method: Type of study was prospective study. this study included 200 pregnant women attending the antenatal OPD in Sri Siddhartha Medical College, Tumkur. Data collection was in a predesigned proforma. Pregnant women with 24-28 weeks of gestation were given 75 grams of oral glucose load, irrespective of their meal and venous blood sample drawn after 2 hours. If blood glucose value was ≥140mg/dl, the screening was considered as DIPSI positive. These patients underwent OGTT.

Results: Incidence of GDM was found to be 3.5% in the patients studied. 40% of cases did not have risk factors, hencethere is a need for universal screening. DIPSI was positive in 10 cases, of which 7 were OGTT positive. Patients were managed with diet and insulin. The maternal and perinatal outcome of pregnancy was good.

Conclusion: For universal screening, DIPSI performed irrespective of last meal timing with 75g glucose load is a patient friendly approach. This method recommended by WHO serves both as a one-step screening and diagnostic procedure & is easy to perform besides being economical.

References

Judith Hyde, Emma Treloar, Robert Fox. Progress in OB&G. Publisher Edinburgh: Elsevier, 16th Vol. 2005:52-72.

Danilenko-Dixon DR, Van Winter JT, Nelson RL, Ogburn Jr PL. Universal versus selective gestational diabetes screening: application of 1997 American Diabetes Association recommendations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Oct 1;181(4):798-802.

Dornhorst A, Rossi M. Risk and prevention of type 2 diabetes in women with Gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(2):B43-9.

Sermer M, Naylor CD, Farine D, Kenshole AB. The Toronto Tri Hospital Gestational diabetes Project- A preliminary review. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(2):B33-42.

First International Workshop- Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Summary and recommendations. Diabetes Care. 1980;3:499-501.

Ferrara A, Hedderson MM, Quesenberry CP, Selby JV. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus detected by the national diabetes data group or the carpenter and coustan plasma glucose thresholds. Diabetes Care. 2002Sep1;25(9):1625-30.

Sheshiah V, Balaji V, Balaji MS et al. One step for screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2005;55:525-9.

Anjalakshi, Balaji, Madhuri et al.A Single procedure to diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus. Acta Diabetol. 2009 Mar1;46(1):51-4.

Esakoff T, Cheng Y, Caughey A. Screening for GDM: different cutoffs for different ethnicities? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005Sep1;193(3):1040-4.

Bonomo M, Gandini ML, Mastropasqua A, Begher C, Valentini U, Faden D, et al. for the Definition of Screening Methods for Gestational Diabetes Study Group of the Lombardy Section of the Italian Society of Diabetol. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(1):179-85.

Seshiah V, Balaji V, Balaji MS, Paneerselvam A, Arthi T, Thamizharasi M, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus manifests in all trimesters of pregnancy. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2007 Sep 1;77(3):482-4.

Jang HC, Cho NH, Jung KB, Oh KS, Dooley SL, Metzger BE. Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in Korea. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1995 Nov 1;51(2):115-22.

Solomon CG, Willett WC, Carey VJ, Rich-Edwards J, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA, et al. A prospective study of pregravid determinants of gestational diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 1997 Oct 1;278(13):1078-83.

Terence T. Lao, MD, Lai-Fong Ho, MSC, Ben C.P. Chan, and Wing- Cheong Leung. Maternal Age and Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:948-9,

Naylor CD, Sermer M, Chen et al. Cesarean delivery in relation to birth weight gestational glucose tolerance: pathophysiology or practice style? JAMA. 1996 Apr 17;275(15):1165-70.

Coustan DR, Carpenter MW, O'Sullivan PS, Carr SR. Gestational diabetes: predictors of subsequent disordered glucose metabolism. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Apr 1;168(4):1139-44.

Abell DA, Beischer NA, Wood C. Routine testing for gestational diabetes, pregnancy, hypoglycemia & fetal growth retardation & results of treatment. J Perinatal Medic. 1976Jan1;4:197-212.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-26

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles