DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20193814

Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study

Raksha K. Shetty, Purnima K. Nadkarni, Pooja P. Singh, Prabhakar Singh, Aditi A. Nadkarni, Vaibhav K. Nadkarni

Abstract


Background: Elective frozen embryo transfer (FET), has recently increased significantly with improvements in cryopreservation techniques. Observational studies and randomized controlled trials suggested that the endometrium in stimulated cycles is not optimally prepared for implantation; risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome reduced and pregnancy rates increased following FET and perinatal outcomes are less affected after FET. However, the evidence is not unequivocal and recent randomised control trials challenge the use of elective FET for the general IVF population. Pregnancy rates were analysed in a cohort of patients undergoing embryo transfers.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent embryo transfers from April 2018 to March 2019 at study centre in Surat.175 cycles of embryo transfers (119 fresh and 56 frozen) were included in the study. Outcomes measured were positive pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and ongoing clinical pregnancy rates achieved in the IVF-ET cycles.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences between positive pregnancy rate (54.6% versus 60.7%, Odds ratio (OR) 0.78; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.41-1.49), clinical pregnancy rate (48.73% versus 57.14%, OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.1- 2.64) and ongoing clinical pregnancy rate  (45.38% versus 51.78% OR 1.4; 95% CI 0.29 - 6.67) in fresh ET and FET cycles, respectively, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all measures.

Conclusions: Despite the observed higher rates of positive biochemical, clinical and ongoing clinical pregnancy per transfer in the FET cohort, these did not reach statistical significance. Thus, both transfer strategies are reasonable options, although there is a trend favouring the freeze-all strategy.


Keywords


Cryopreservation, Clinical pregnancy rate, Frozen embryo transfer, Fresh embryo transfer, Vitrification

Full Text:

PDF

References


Vaerenbergh I, Lommel L, Ghislain V, Veld P, Schuit F, Fatemi HM, Devroey P, Bourgain C. In GnRH antagonist/rec-FSH stimulated cycles, advanced endometrial maturation on the day of oocyte retrieval correlates with altered gene expression. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1085-91.

Kolibianakis EM, Devroey P. The luteal phase after ovarian stimulation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;5(1):26-35.

Chetkowski RJ, Kiltz RJ, Salyer WR. In premature luteinization, progesterone induces secretory transformation of the endometrium without impairment of embryoviability. Fertil Steril. 1997;68:292-7.

Evans J, Hannan NJ, Hincks C, Rombauts LJ, Salamonsen LA. Defective soil for a fertile seed? Altered endometrial development is detrimental to pregnancy success. PLoSONE. 2012;7:e53098.

Kang HJ. Programmed versus natural frozen embryo transfer: which is the best nest? Fertility Sterility. 2018;110(4):636-7.

Trounson A, Mohr L. Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo. Nature. 1983;305:707-9.

Anderson AR, Wilkinson SS, Prince S, Crain JL. Reduction of high order multiples in frozen embryo transfers. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;10:402-5.

Rama GA, Haranath GB, Krishna KM, Prakash GJ, Madan K. Vitrification of human 8-cell embryos, a modified protocol for better pregnancy rates. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11:434-7.

Al-Hasani S, Osmen B, Koutlaki N, Schoepper B, Diedrich K, Schultze A. Three years of routine vitrification of human zygotes: is it still fair to advocate slow-rate freezing? Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:288-93.

Balaban B, Urman B, Ata B, Isiklar A, Larman MG, Hamilton R, et al. A randomized controlled study of human day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and blastocyst formation. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1976-82.

Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Ieda S, Kato O. Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11:608-14.

Rall WF, Fahy GM. Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at -196°C by vitrification. Nature. 1985;313:573-5.

Gordts S, Roziers P, Campo R, Noto V. Survival and pregnancy outcome after ultrarapid freezing of human embryos. Fertil Steril. 1990;53:469-72.

Vajta G, Nagy ZP. Are programmable freezers still needed in the embryo laboratory? Review on vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12:779-96.

Liu J, Huang G. Comparison of the vitrification and slow freezing protocol for day 3 embryo cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2011;361:213.

Muthukumar K, Mangalaraj AM, Kamath MS, George K. Blastocyst cryopreservation: Vitrification or slow freeze? Fertil Steril. 2008;90:427.

Aflatoonian A, Mansoori Moghaddam F, Mashayekhy M, Mohamadian F. Comparison of early pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after frozen and fresh embryo transfer in ART cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27:695-700.

Aflatoonian A, Oskouian H, Ahmadi S, Oskouian L. Can fresh embryo transfers be replaced by cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfers in assisted reproductive cycles? A randomized controlled trial. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27:357-63.

Ku PY, Lee RK, Lin SY, Lin MH, Hwu YM. Comparison of the clinical outcomes between fresh blastocyst and vitrified-thawed blastocyst transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29(12):1353-6.

Song T, Liu L, Zhou F, Lin XN, Zhang SY. Frozenthawed embryo transfer (FET) versus fresh embryo transfer in clinical pregnancy rate during in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2009;89:2928-30.

Keenan J, Marshall E, Heidel E. Women over 37 have superior pregnancy rates with frozen compared with fresh embryo transfers-An analysis of 43,5765 cycles from the national art surveillance system (NASS). Fertility and Sterility. 2017;108(3):167-8.

Nayar KD, Ahuja R, Singh M, Gupta M, Kant G, Sharma N et al. Elective frozen versus fresh embryo transfer in antagonist cycle in normo-responders: a randomised study. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(3):168.

Nayar K, Gupta R, Gupta M, Singh M, Kant G, Nayar D. Comparison of fresh versus frozen embryo transfer in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertility Science and Research.2017;4(2),102-5.

Belva F, Henriet S, Van E, Camus M, Devroey P, Vander EJ, et al. Neonatal outcome of 937 children born after transfer of cryopreserved embryos obtained by ICSI and IVF and comparison with outcome data of fresh ICSI and IVF cycles. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2227-38.

Basirat Z, Adib R, Esmailzadeh S, Ali JSG, Hajian- TK, Pasha H, et al. Comparison of pregnancy rate between fresh embryo transfers and frozen-thawed embryo transfers following ICSI treatment. Int J Reprod Bio Med. 2016;14(1):39-46.

Vladimirov IK, Tacheva D, Diez A. Theory about the embryo cryo-treatment. Reprod Med Biol. 2017;16:118-25.

Estill MS, Bolnick JM, Waterland RA, Bolnick AD, Diamond MP, Krawetz SA. Assisted reproductive technology alters deoxyribonucleic acid methylation profiles in bloodspots of newborn infants. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:629-39.

Diez JA, Rubio C, Marin C. Mitochondrial DNA content as a viability score in human euploid embryos: less is better. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:534-41.

Roque M, Lattes K, Serra S, Solà I, Geber S, Carreras R, et al. Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:156-62.

Roque M, Valle M, Guimarães F, Sampaio M, Geber S. Cost-effectiveness of the freeze-all policy. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2015;19(3):125-30.

Zarek SM, Mumford SL, Segars JH, Armstrong AY. Cost effective analysis comparing a freeze-all protocol to fresh blastocyst embryo transfers in normal responders. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(3):241.

Lee AM, Connell MT, Csokmay JM, Styer AK Elective single embryo transfer- the power of one. Contracep Reprod Med. 2016;1:11.

Elective single-embryo transfer. Fertility and Sterility. 2012;97(4):835-42.

Pittenger S, Cedars M, Kao C, Rosen M, Rinaudo P. Spontaneous abortion rate is higher after frozen vs. fresh embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):97.

Saidah TK, Amaral WN, Saidah K, Saidah CM, Vieira CA, Caldas CD. Fertil In vitro IVF World. Reprod Med Genet Stem Cell Biol. 2017;5(3):1-4.

Huang B, Hu D, Qian K, Ai J, Li Y, Jin L. Is frozen embryo transfer cycle associated with a significantly lower incidence of ectopic pregnancy? An analysis of more than 30,000 cycles. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(5):1345-9.