DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20193698

Evaluation of fetal fibronectin rapid bedside test as a predictor of preterm labour: a prospective study

Kusum Dogra, Meenakshi Tanwar

Abstract


Background: Preterm birth defined as birth before 37 weeks of gestation is a significant public health issue. Identification of patients at risk of preterm labour while ruling out those who are not is a fundamental but challenging goal for clinicians. This study was done to evaluate bed side dipstick test for detecting fetal fibronectin in cervico-vaginal secretions as a predictor of preterm delivery in symptomatic and asymptomatic high risk group.

Methods: This was a hospital based prospective, double blinded study. We enrolled 100 pregnant women presenting with or without symptoms of preterm delivery, between 20 and 35 weeks of gestation. A rapid bed side dipstick test was performed to detect FFN in cervico-vaginal secretions of all enrolled women (symptomatic and asymptomatic high risk women) and results were evaluated for prediction of preterm labour. Qualitative data were analyzed by using Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test and quantitative data were analyzed by using unpaired Student’s t test and Mann-Whitney test. P value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: In symptomatic group sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of FFN test in predicting delivery within 48 hours, 7days 14days and preterm delivery was 100%, 63.2%, 46.2%, 100%; 100%, 72.7%, 65.4%, 100%; 100%, 75%, 69.2%, 100%; 80%, 76%, 76.9%, 79.2% respectively. In asymptomatic high risk group, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of FFN test in predicting preterm delivery (<37weeks) was 0%, 87.5%, 0%, 77.8%.

Conclusions: The high negative predictive value may be of value in avoiding unnecessary interventions with potentially hazardous medications and identifying symptomatic women who are not in true labour and also allaying anxiety of asymptomatic high risk women.


Keywords


Fetal fibronectin test, Preterm delivery, Positive predictive value, Negative predictive value, Quick check test

Full Text:

PDF

References


Copper RL, Goldenberg RL, Creasy RK, DuBard MB, Davis RO, Entman SS, et al. A multicenter study of preterm birth and gestational age- specific neonatal mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168(1Pt 1):78-84.

Crowley P. Prophylactic corticosteroids for preterm birth. Cochrane Pregnancy and childbirth group. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2003:3.

Mercer BM, Goldenberg RL, Moawad AH, Meis PJ, Iams JD, Das AF, Caritis SN, et al. The preterm prediction study: effects of gestational age and cause of preterm birth on subsequent obstetric outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181(5 Pt 1):1216-21.

Haram K, Mortensen JH, Wollen AL. Preterm delivery: an overview. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82(8):687-704.

Lockwood CJ, Senyei AE, Dische MR, Casal D, Shah KD, Thung SN, et al. Fetal fibronectin in cervical and vaginal secretions as a predictor of preterm delivery. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(10):669-74.

Nageotte MP, Casal D, Senyei AE. Fetal fibronectin in patients at increased risk for premature birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170(1Pt1):20-5.

Cherouny PH, Pankuch GA, Romero R, Botti JJ, Kuhn DC, Demers LM, et al. Neutrophil attractant/activating peptide-1/interleukin-8: association with histologic chorioamnionitis, preterm delivery, and bioactive amniotic fluid leukoattractants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169(5):1299-303.

Inglis SR, Jeremias J, Kuno K, Lescale K, Peeper Q, Chervenak FA, et al. Detection of tumor necrosis factor -alpha, interleukin-6, and fetal fibronectin in the lower genital tract during pregnancy: relation to outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171(1): 5-10.

Closset E, Dufour P, Coeugnet C, Subtil D, Valat AS, Puech F. Value of fetal fibronectin research for predicting premature delivery. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2001;29(11):808-13.

Morrison JC, Allbert JR, McLaughlin BN, Whitworth NS, Roberts WE, Martin RW. Oncofetal fibronectin in patients with false labor as a predictor of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168(2):538-42.

Goldenberg RL, Mercer BM, Meis PJ, Copper RL, Das A, McNellis D. The preterm prediction study: Fetal fibronectin testing and spontaneous preterm birth: NICHD Maternal Fetal Medicine Units Network.Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(5 Pt 1):643-8.

Moore T, Hennessy EM, Myles J. Neurological and developmental outcome in extremely preterm children born in England in 1995 and 2006: the EPI Cure studies. Br Med J. 2012;345:217-24.

Blencowe H, Cousens S, Chou D. Born too soon: the global epidemiology of 15 million preterm births. Reprod Health. 2013;10:S2.

Tekesin I, Marek S, Hellmeyer L, Reitz D, Schmidt S. Assessment of rapid fetal fibronectin in predicting preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(2):280-4.

Peaceman AM, Andrews WW, Thorp JM, Cliver SP, Lukes A, Iams JD, et al. Fetal fibronectin as a predictor of preterm birth in patients with symptoms: a multicentre trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(1):13-8.

Lowe MP, Zimmerman B, Hansen W. Prospective randomized controlled trial of fetal fibronectin or preterm labor management in a tertiary care centre. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(2):358-62.

Grobman WA, Welshman EE, Calhoun EA. Does fetal fibronectin use in the diagnosis of preterm labor affect physician behavior and health care costs? A randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(1):235-40.