LAVH or TAH – choosing it wise and making it safe

Authors

  • K. P. Muralikrishnan Nambiar Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Mangalore, Karnataka 575001, India
  • K. Supriya Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Mangalore, Karnataka 575001, India
  • Suchithra Thunga Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Mangalore, Karnataka 575001, India
  • Simar Kaur Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Mangalore, Karnataka 575001, India
  • Joel Karunakaran Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Mangalore, Karnataka 575001, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20160562

Keywords:

Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH), Total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), Duration, Complication, Cost

Abstract

Background: Hysterectomy is the most commonly performed surgery in our gynaecological practice, abdominal route being the most common. Here we compare the various features and outcomes of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) with total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH).

Methods: The study design is a retrospective observational study. Outcome measures were indication, duration, complications of surgery, post op recovery and cost following TAH and LAVH.

Results: A total of 116 cases underwent hysterectomy. Of these 98 underwent TAH and 18 underwent LAVH. Commonest indication for TAH in our study was fibroid followed by abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB); whereas in LAVH it was AUB followed by fibroid. Mean operating time in TAH was 118 minutes whereas in LAVH it was 166 minutes. One patient who underwent LAVH had ureteric injury and another had vault abscess. There were no major complications among TAH cases. A few patients had minor complications like fever, wound infection and urinary tract infection following TAH whereas fever was the only minor complication seen in a minority of the LAVH patients. Mean fall in haemoglobin in TAH was 1.05 gm% whereas in LAVH it was 0.95 gm%. None of the patients required postoperative blood transfusion. A few patients following TAH required additional analgesics apart from routine whereas in LAVH none required it. Mean duration of hospital stay following TAH was 6.84 days where as in LAVH it was 3.1 days. Mean hospital expenses in TAH were INR 28480, while for LAVH it was 44360.

Conclusions: Undoubtedly expertise is the decisive factor behind the success of hysterectomy. LAVH though advantageous in many aspects like less post operative pain and cosmetic benefits, it could be technically demanding with availability only in well-equipped centres and cost factors. Surgeons need to be trained in all modalities of hysterectomy.

References

Arbogast JD, Welch RA, Riza ED, Ricaurte EL, Pieper DR. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy appears to be an alternative to total abdominal hysterectomy journal of laparoendoscopic surgery. 1994;4(3).

Lake AG, McPencow AM. Surgical site infection after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(5).

Busacca M, Zupi E, Garcea N, Paparella P, Catalano GF. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: A prospective, randomized, multicenter study. American Journal of Obstetrics and gynecology. 1999;180(2):270-5.

Devaja O, Samara I, Papadopoulos AJ. Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy (LAVH) Versus Total Abdominal Hysterectomy (TAH) in Endometrial Carcinoma Prospective Cohort Study. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2010;20(4).

Sutasanasuang S. Laparoscopic Hysterectomy versus Total Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Comparative Study. J Med Assoc Thai. 2011;94(1).

Jyotsana, Manhas K. Clinical Trial of Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy Versus Total Abdominal Hysterectomy. JK Science, Journal of Medical Education & Research. 2006;8(2):97-100.

Asgari Z, Bahreini F, Samiee H, Eslami B, Tehranian A, Sabet S. Comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2008;22(1):22-8.

Tsai EM, Chen HS, Long CY, Yang CH, Hsu SC, Wu CH, et al. Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy versus Total Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Study of 100 Cases on Light-Endorsed Transvaginal Section. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2003;55:105-9.

Harris JA, Rone BK. Postoperative Morbidity of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Approach and Uterine Size. Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2015;4(1):153-9.

Jahan S, Das T, Mahmud N, Khan MI, Akter L, Mondol SK, et al. A comparative study between laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy: Experience in a tertiary diabetes care hospital in Bangladesh. J Gynecol Endosc Surg. 2011;2(2):79-84.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-23

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles